sh1t like this really sums up these supposed boxing fans they call pactards.
"no,not even close" lmao jump off a bridge like the ts said
So you really have him above Pacquiao, Martinez, Donaire, and Marquez?
you cant hanle the truth, that Pac is a fake, hype job, that got by with EPO Steroids, HGH, Aside meth, FIXED FIGHTS, and being babied:bottle::bottle: by his mommy-Arum.
I bolded the parts where you have no actual proof of those accusations.
Man, some of you act like he retired to avoid fighters.
of course pac can choose to fight berto. unfortunately for pac though, even if he beats berto the haters will still hate him and the excuses will still pour in.
Well no ish...Berto is not African-American, he's Hatian-American.
I'm assuming its the same reason why pacstans hate two of the best slick boxers in the game today Sergio and JMM
Man, why don't those two fight each other?
I think Clottey was the best opponent available at welterweight when the Floyd fight didn't push through. A lot of boxing experts were even saying they thought that Clottey won the fight against Cotto. As for Margarito, that was Pacman's well deserved R&R, mixing his business with pleasure...
The Ring's top welterweights at the time Pacquiao chose to fight Clottey were...
1.) Mayweather (negotiations fell apart)
2.) Pacquiao (he can't fight himself)
3.) Mosley (Booked at the time with Berto)
4.) Cotto (defeated him)
5.) Clottey
6.) Berto (Booked at the time with Mosley)
Dude...really. Bringing up Torrecampo? Why not bring up Mayweather's amateur career where he lost 6 times into the discussion in relevance to his current career.
u know they gonna turn a deaf ear 2 the Truth...but u know what?
The Truth always wins.....more people are waking up not going 4 the dumb
sh1t no more.......u see the devil uses nationality and ethnic background to cloud peoples judgements...so people on here judgin' with their heart and not objectively looking at The Truth from a mental standpoint...that's
why no matter how much u try 2 break down **** to poochie's fans...they gonna turn a deaf ear...like that muthafukka ain't duckin' 140 division like he ain't duckin' Black fighters....so basically arum is saying that the only loss he will take is to Mayweather no other Black fighter brings as much money....
You do realize Pacquiao's camp had agreed with Mayweather's camp to randomized urine testing all the way up to the fight already, right? You also do realize there's a huge difference with drawing blood and taking a urine sample minutes before a fight, right?
Just throw away your keyboard. You're an embarrassment to retarded people.
No, it couldn't have. Not a chance. So...sowwie! :lol1:
Again, they based it on a suspicion because they had no proof. End of story. Like I said, a natural human reaction.
Which is why the commission turned them down. Fine. I get that. They went to the ring anyway. It's not as if they backed away.
Now show me A-side meth...this isn't a signature. I would really like to see it.
There's a difference between blood and urine? Really? WOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Right, so telling someone to pee in a cup will have the same effect on anyone as having blood drawn and then telling them to fight about a half hour later?
No blood is getting drawn the day of the fight - USADA said there was no need to do it that day. They understand this isn't track and field. Next question, please?
And what does that have to do with getting urine the day of? Roach has stated before they would give urine all the way up to the fight with Mayweather. You can't b**** about Roach calling for a urine test here.
Yeah, they didn't think of that when they were b*tching, did they?
What the hell are you talking about? If you find any banned substance in a locker room, of course you're going to bring it up.
Let me be the first to tell you today, HYDROXYCUT HASN'T USED EPHEDRA SINCE 2009, NO OVER THE COUNTER DRUG IS ALLOWED IN THE USA WITH EPHEDRA.
You my friend have failed.
Then every media outlet has failed also.
And...
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/518091-manny-pacquiao-camp-accuses-antonio-margarito-of-ephedra-use
That's nice...except it wasn't Hydroxylean they discovered. You're grasping at straws now. Bottom line...they had nothing but demanded based on suspicion. It's a natural human reaction.
They saw a similar product that could've contained a banned substance. They requested additional urine testing. It wasn't the product. Their request was denied.
Now...show me A-side meth.
they came long before Sr put them out there in the media. i mean, what you say has no cred. anyways. you didnt know that HC was ephedra free
Show me A-side meth.
1. What banned substance did they find?
They found Hydroxycut, which contains ephedra, a banned substance.
http://msn.foxsports.com/boxing/story/manny-pacquiao-antonio-margarito-round-by-round-111310
There is no banned substance in Hydroxycut and the only thing they found anyway was sweetener. So in other words, their suspicions were wrong. Didn't stop them from demanding extra tests - right before the fight, no less :lol1:. Oh, the irony.
Fine, I'll concede. Nevertheless, Hydroxycut did at one point contain ephedra, which warranted a complaint. Now what evidence does Mayweather have that he should be given random OST? Show me what A-side meth is before you present an argument please. I mean...that is what the Mayweathers are accusing him of, right? THEN show me why the Mayweathers should demand extra testing.
I'm not. I'm laughing at Roach demanding extra testing based on his suspicion while his fighter cracks the ribs of a super middleweight.
He was told by his own representative, who was in Margarito's locker room, that he found a banned substance. They found hydroxycut, which used to or still does, contain a banned substance. That certainly more proof than the Mayweather's allegations of Pacquiao on A-side meth.
Wow...come on! There's a huge difference between drawing blood and taking a urine test minutes before the fight. Let's also keep in mind Pacquiao's team had already said they would give urine test anytime they were asked to. Pacquiao's team even fought Margarito without the urine test.
LMAO @ this bullsh*t. Coca-Cola once contained cocaine, I guess they should've logged a complaint about it.
Hydroxycut with ephedra can still be obtained (with a similar name and look in Hydroxylean). The last time sealed Coca-Cola bottles contained cocaine was in the early twentieth century.
Show me A-side meth.
Ok, you aren't pretending to be dumb. Got it.
Now show me what A-side meth is. If you can't, just say it. Say you don't even know if it exists.
Glad to see you're avoiding this request as hard as Mayweather avoiding Pacquiao.
pacs performance and the rumors of juicing for years. and as he said, i guy that weighed in at 144 cracking the ribs of a jr middle weight.
that warrants the want of testing to make sure dude isnt juicing and playing on an even playing field
The rumors stemmed from Mayweather Sr. That argument doesn't hold up in a child's courtroom.
Again...show me A-side meth.
No, only Roger has. Floyd Mayweather is asking for OST. That's all, Mr. Cochrane.
But surely Mayweather Jr. listens to his uncle/trainer, right? I mean, he's one of the reasons why Mayweather's camp brought all the random OST up in the first place.
Now show me what A-side meth is. If you can't, just say it. Say you don't even know if it exists.
Yeah, he listens. And? And what do you mean he's one of the reasons? Why don't you show me where you saw that?
You're either purposely being dumb or are dumb. If it's the former, let's chat when you're serious. If it's the latter then carry on with someone else.
Now show me what A-side meth is. If you can't, just say it. Say you don't even know if it exists.
Is this really that difficult for you to do?
This is the issue for you? What are you, his lawyer? How the f*ck would we know unless he showed a willingness to submit to full testing?
The Mayweathers are accusing Pacquiao of being on A-side meth. I just want to know what it looks like and what its effects are. Can you do that? Can anyone do that?