I'd put Pacquiao-Marquez 2 on there before many of those fights, including Pacquiao-Morales 1.
And I love the first three Vazquez-Marquez fights. The third ended as perfectly as a fan could have hoped.
Yeah both Pacquiao-Marquez fights were great, looking forward to their 3rd fight.
Corrales-Castillo 1, should be # 1 period.
Corrales-Castillo is something I'm usually split on, I'll agree that for 9 1/3 rounds it probably was the best fight of the decade but for me the ending wasn't just, Corrales twice spat his mouthpeice out, I know he was penalized the second time but he was given nearly 40 seconds to rest. I can't help but think that Castillo would have stopped Corrales had he not cheated.
Eubank is relentless and seems to have inherited his fathers mandible, This would have the potential to create an explosive fight. I think Golovkin wins however Eubank is more of a live dog that most people would care to admit.
Although I'm not 100% impressed with his recent opposition, he has been active and is still only 20. I hope he gets to pulvurise chavez at some point in the near future.
Im still confused on one matter .
Why didn't Wilder take the Breazeale fight for 15 million on DAZN and a guaranteed Joshua fight if he was fighting Breazeale next anyway ? anybody ?
Earning 3x more money on DAZN would mean him fighting for "the white man" Hearn, who takes advantage of fighters with colour and is only looking to line his own pockets. Or some kind of dumb narrative like that.
Okay, I'll wait for the replay on youtube SMH. Just shut up dude. You probably never knew the two fighters until now.
"I probably never knew the two fighters until now", "probably". What retarded line of argument, this isn't doing much to prove Kameda won is it?
It's not a great fight but it's not bad, I know people want him fighting Thurman/Bradley ect but it takes 2 sides to make a fight, Brook can only fight what's put in front of him.
Bradley fights 3 times in 2 years and is allowed to defend his title against a shot Casamayor whos gone 2-2 in 3 years, imagine if Khan did that.
Bradleys a chump.
He was born in London but his parents are from Nigeria.
Yup, so he's British. I find it strange he's reffered to as a Nigerian yet Huck (a man born and raised in Ugao, Serbia) is reffered to as German.
Well I guess there was no fact finding before writing this 'article' then, takes a whole 15 seconds to check a fighters birthplace and the country he represents. Good job.
yea i agree, i could see degale winning a couple of early rounds,
but even that depends on the way froch starts,
but say for arguement sake he wins the first early rounds,
he will have to hit froch hard to keep him off,
and as you saw in the dirrell fight after a couple of round of power punching he was gassed, im happy he won the title but he just about got away with it imo...
Carl? Is that you? Degale won that fight clearly,no "just about got away with it" he was up 4 rounds after 6 and won the last 2 clearly.
Fonfara needs to rematch Chavez Jr at 168! No catchweight BS.
The rematch would be totally different now that Jr's shooken off the ring rust.
Chavez moved up to challenge Fonfara, why would/should Fonfara move down to fight a guy he already beat the **** out of?
Even if he did move down he would win again easily, if Chavez couldn't hurt him at 175 how is he going to hurt him at 168?
"I knew from the first round when he hit me, he couldn't hurt me and that i would win the fight" -Fonfara post fight
No this isnt the next best alternative, Lara is, if GGG want to prove himself asap then fight Lara @ 160, he is proven and a tricky opponent and he has been calling GGG out for a while now, and afaik GGG hasnt responded, while i believe GGG would be too much for Lara i dont see why Loefflers hasnt made it his top priority to make the GGG-Lara fight, why fight Eubank? sure hes entertaining and flashy and acctually a pretty good fighter but he doesnt have a shot at all right now against GGG, he aint prepared, and Eubank is easy to hit so no matter how good his chin is it wont last against GGGs power
So moral of the story make GGG vs Lara instead, its the only viable option for GGGs legacy at this time, its really the only opponent right now (that is willing to face him) that will test GGGs full skillset, maybe next year Andrade, JRock etc etc might be ready but for now just make Lara vs GGG what dafuq are you waiting for
Lara has never fought at 160, nor handled lesser fighters that well, he was dropped hard twice by Angulo. It would be a 1 sided beatdown, Lara brings nothing new to the table. Nobody wants to see it.
Intriguing that Eubank Sr. now refuses to work with Eddie Hearn. I always say that there are 3 versions to every story. The version of each side and the truth. Something tells me Hearn never gave Eubank Sr. a take it or leave it call.
Many different sources have come out and said how difficult Eubank SR is to deal with. Frank Warrens inter view and Hearns is enough to indicate what a dick Sr can be.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sOVzLDSq9qU
He ducked a guy he was losing too ,,he also looked for a Tyson rematch over Vitali ,when Tyson bailed so did Lewis !
So? He looked for an easy payday at the end of his career. Vitali lost cleanly to an under prepared out of shape Lewis, he had his chance and lost. yes he was ahead on points, but points don't make any difference when you lose by TKO.
This is the same redundant argument Vitali fans have used for years, it's old. Lewis won get over it.
Kell Brook can't even sell out in Sheffield, so many tickets available for this saturday it's embarassing let alone wembley
There's under 500 tickets left as far as I know, against a fighter who the general public and many hardcore fans aren't knowledgeable about.