Even though i hate how he punches, He wont a light heavyweight title punching like a lightweight ... Quite an acheivment.
my thoughts exactly, His offense isnt even boxing
Tye fields won his first 12 fights by first round knockout, and is 41-1 with 37 knockouts. But his opposition was crap, and for the most part, so was Tyson's. Throw in an old, out of shape ex champ, and a blown up light heavyweight, and who do you have left that he really beat? Holyfield and Douglas exposed Mike for what he really was, a good, fast, hard hitting, aggressive small HW with good head movement that could string punches together in combinations. But with a lot of people thinking he could blow any HW in history out in the first round, he is certainly overrated, at least by some.
thats nice and all that your wrote all that but question wasn't was tyson overated. The question was his power overated.
and you said yourself he was powerful. So I dont know why your disagreeing.
what he really was, a good, fast, hard hitting, aggressive small HW
Yes I realize Tyson's earlier fights were subpar opponents. But none the less he like Tye has a lot of power, and that was the question.
I'm not waiting for that shitty game. Fight Night 3 sucked hard, few of the fighters in the game actually still fight and it gets real repetitive fast
You are by far in the minority if you think FN3 sucked. Maybe not the game for you I guess, but many boxing fans and gamers really liked fn3
I'm not waiting for that shitty game. Fight Night 3 sucked hard, few of the fighters in the game actually still fight and it gets real repetitive fast.
ya online was defiantly crap
HOF? For what?
What will his resume say he hasnt really beat any major contenders. His most impressive feat is a Ko against castillo and lasted 10 rounds with mayweather?
Unless something drastically changes with his opponents in the next few years I dont see that happening.
Real outcome is basically an opinion if the fight hadn't even started so yea.
Its called sarcasm.
Your saying your post was sarcasm now?
I hardly doubt that was your intention. I realize what you meant by your title but you followed it up with specifics on what is going to happen. Which makes me think your nothing but a nuthugger and spitting out random-self-proclaimed-future-facts because you want your fighter to win.
Real outcome is basically what it states. A real outcome. Its not an opinion nor is it commonly known as a opinion in the forum world as you say.
I voted Clottey.
Although if the same Judah shows up that boxed Cotto, I dont think Clottey has a chance. I just think that was a semi fluke that night.
You're obviously a Mexican with that poor photoshopped image of Tony KO'ing Cotto on a dark skinned body...
Now I can tell your dumb.
Just leave the thread.. You just killed yourself.
Im white actually. Unlike you I dont choose my boxer's because they were born in a certain country.
And the cotto's picture on a black body is obviously meant to be that way.
This is actually the first fight in a long time I have chosen a boxer over Cotto. Im not blinded by race
I wish American fans had half the enthusiasm of British fans :(
That being said, I should of added to my previous post that there will be no question he will be in British Hall of Fame
Even though I think Margarito will win and my reasons are beyond the point. I would never make a thread stating the real outcome of a fight that hasnt even happened yet.
Its a close fight on paper period. So many factors are involved that could make the fight have many different outcomes.
This thread is pointless, if your so sure this is going to be the "real outcome" go put your life savings on a TKO in round 9
Your photshop skills are sick son.
But my boy Judah gets the ko in round 4.
Thank you sir,(many many hours of practice ;) :joke:) and thats the kind of prediction I like to hear!