Fury vs Joshua: Who has better resume?

Zhang smashes wilder. he punches harder too I think I said similar. I give Wilder credit for retaining a belt. It's the only thing he has on his resume.

I don't doubt Zhang is the better fighter for a second. But you can't underestimate what it takes to hold a belt. I don't rate Wilder at all, but he did something not many did. Plenty of new champions fold. Fury, Ruiz... Wilder defended. It elevates his resume. Zhang smashes wilder. he punches harder too

AJ also has three dominant losses on his resume. That is what happens when you fight good competition. Wilder 3x is not a great competition.

Obviously AJ.

It's easy to hold a belt if you defend against the guys wilder fought. Ortiz was the only top 10 opponent he defended against and he was about 40. If wilder had been fighting the parkers, whytes, Joyce's, zhangs, ruizs, hes out of there a long long time ago. He artificially extended his career and title run with a series of easy fights. Joshua, fury, ruiz did not do that but you seem to be giving wilder credit for easy fights instead of criticism Easier... But not easy. If he fought half decent opponents he'd have just been another short term titlist. I'm sure of that. He's just not a very good boxer. But holding onto a belt still comes with a certain pressure. He was a champion for a spell. It adds a bit to every victory. He had something, even just from a mentality perspective. ​

Casuals applying triangularity to compare resumes. It is who you fought, when you fought, and how you won that matters more than just the name. Otherwise, Leon Spinks should be better than Liston, Frazier, and Foreman because he beat Ali. Would he have beaten a 60s or early 70s Ali though? And triangularity doesn't work either. Frazier was Ali's toughest fights but Foreman made easy work of him. Yet, Ali beat Foreman by KO. Styles make fights.

I don't doubt Zhang is the better fighter for a second. But you can't underestimate what it takes to hold a belt. I don't rate Wilder at all, but he did something not many did. Plenty of new champions fold. Fury, Ruiz... Wilder defended. It elevates his resume. It's easy to hold a belt if you defend against the guys wilder fought. Ortiz was the only top 10 opponent he defended against and he was about 40. If wilder had been fighting the parkers, whytes, Joyce's, zhangs, ruizs, hes out of there a long long time ago. He artificially extended his career and title run with a series of easy fights. Joshua, fury, ruiz did not do that but you seem to be giving wilder credit for easy fights instead of criticism

I side with AJ but if Fury dominates a/o kos Usyk, Fury takes the mantle.

AJ also has three dominant losses on his resume.

Zhang has a better resume than Wilder he best Joyce twice. Joyce is better than anyone Wilder has ever beat I don't doubt Zhang is the better fighter for a second. But you can't underestimate what it takes to hold a belt. I don't rate Wilder at all, but he did something not many did. Plenty of new champions fold. Fury, Ruiz... Wilder defended. It elevates his resume.

Zhang has a better resume than Wilder he best Joyce twice. Joyce is better than anyone Wilder has ever beat

Fury vs Joshua: Who actually has better resume? Fury's best wins: Klitschko Wilder 2x Chisora 2x Whyte Wallin Schwarz Hammer AJ's best wins: Klitschko Povetkin Whyte Parker Andy Ruiz Pulev Wallin Helenius Takam Wilder is right hand or bust Del Bum, is not a good name Ditto Hammer and Schwarz Whyte is a glorified journeyman Clearly AJ has the better resume.

It's AJ. But there's road left to travel.

AJ better. Add Ngannou to Furys list with the asterisk (of fighting a 0-0 fighter and also getting KD).

If Fury beats Usyk then it's him and its not close. If Fury loses to Usyk then him and AJ should happen and it's whoever wins that either way it'll be answered soon ......

If Fury beats Usyk then it's him and its not close. If Fury loses to Usyk then him and AJ should happen and it's whoever wins that either way it'll be answered soon

It’s obviously AJ. Fury needed a robbery of the year to beat John McDermott the first time.

Fury vs Joshua: Who actually has better resume? Fury's best wins: Klitschko Wilder 2x Chisora 2x Whyte Wallin Schwarz Hammer AJ's best wins: Klitschko Povetkin Whyte Parker Andy Ruiz Pulev Wallin Helenius Takam He also lost to ruiz.

Fury's arguibly best win (Wilder) just lost to Parker. Who lost to Joshua & many other fighters. Isn't that how it works? Didn't Parker lose to Ruiz?

Id say josh, but I respect fury so much for fighting in backyards of wlad and wilder. So fury and Josh need to fight. If fury beats Josh then fury is greater