Criteria: Entertaining/Competitive
1. Mayweather vs Maidana
2. Pacquiao vs Bradley
3. Canelo vs Angulo
4. Cotto vs Martinez
wait what????
Canelo v ANgulo gets mention above Froch v Groves? Do you even watch boxing?
For me it goes
1. Froch v Groves, wins hands down both in competitiveness and entertainment
2. Floyd v Maidana, competitive but not very entertaining
3. Pacquiao v Bradley
4. Cotto v Martinez
But a better criteria is which was the best PPV in terms of p4p entrants in the fight and what it meant to boxing
1. Cotto v Martinez, the changing of the lineal MW championship
2. Pacman v Bradley, p2p top 4 guys going at it
3. Froch v Groves, both men arguably top 5 in the division, Froch a solid number 2 if not 1 and Groves the best young guy at the weight, and that ending!
4. Mayweather v Maidana....didn't really mean much at 147 as more people wanted to see Khan fight him lol and Maidana isn't exactly a great fighter.
Criteria: Entertaining/Competitive
1. Mayweather vs Maidana
2. Pacquiao vs Bradley
3. Canelo vs Angulo
4. Cotto vs Martinez
1. Pacquiao vs Bradley (Most evenly matched, and quite exciting)
2. Cotto vs Martinez (more exciting than May/Maidana)
3. Mayweather vs Maidana (more even than Cotto/Martinez)
4. Canelo vs Angulo (a blowout, not competitive at all, but mildly entertaining)