Does Jones legacy past 2003 count?

[Mike_b]

He seems content with what hes accomplished( why wouldn't he be?) But he had some major losses to Calzaghe, Hopkins, Lebedev, Tarver, Tarver and Johnson. His fight with Tito would have made more sense had Tito beat Hopkins and moved up in weight immediately,

By the time they fought, it was an exhibition. Also how much credit does an age like fine wine Hopkins beating him knowing that he already beat him (bhop) in his prime.

And how could the Calzaghe fight not count legacy wise? It speaks volumes that Joe beat everyone in the ring including Roy.

[_Rexy_]

Of course not.


And the Atlanta Falcons won Super Bowl LI

[Earl-Hickey]

Yes.

Americans seem to think legacy only is when they are wining, when they lose it doesn't count according to them

[Mike_b]

Yes.

Americans seem to think legacy only is when they are wining, when they lose it doesn't count according to them

That's funny to say the least, interesting

[RHETOЯIC]

Yes. You gotta take the good, with the bad, with the ugly..

[RespekonMyName]

After 2005, a win over Jones didn't mean much. Calzaghe beat a mummy. It's sad that victory is held up as a trophy for Joe. That's like Holmes beating Ali.

[Mike_b]

After 2005, a win over Jones didn't mean much. Calzaghe beat a mummy. It's sad that victory is held up as a trophy for Joe. That's like Holmes beating Ali.

That was the scariest thing watching Ali walk into the ring WITH Parkinson s not just after his career but during...

[Outwest Exp 355]

Yes.

Americans seem to think legacy only is when they are wining, when they lose it doesn't count according to them

You bastards do it too.

[Mike_b]

You bastards do it too.

Lol. Across the pond beef! Lol

[Outwest Exp 355]

Lol. Across the pond beef! Lol

No beef it’s just true.