Tyson Fury: "Wilder will NEVER get another shot at me"

[1hourRun]

Thats right you fraud, prove us right. You cant beat the champ in a fair-one so you got to find reasons to avoid the 'Bronze-Bomber' Deontay Wilder. RUN TYSON, RUN!!!

[Mitchell Kane]

Fury doesn’t owe Wilder anything at this point.

But all this talk by Fury only matters if he keeps winning ... and beats Joshua.

Regardless, I still expect they’ll fight again ... but Wilder prolly has to put some wins together before it happens.

[Madison Boxing]

these guys are gonna freeze him out maybe he can be pbc world champ, fight ortiz and stiverne for a 3rd or 4th time, look like a 'monster' again

[kafkod]

I'm pretty sure we have different laws per regions. I'd be surprised if NYC has the same as FLA let alone FLA and UK.

That said, I was just making a joke really, but, here you do need to prove they knowingly and actively lied to damage. You have to prove they knew they were lying and only did it to hurt the other party. Here being Florida.

Don't know about anywhere else, but in the UK, intent to defame has to be established. That probably applies in the US too, because both countries use English Common Law as the basis of their judicial systems.

If he was sued by Fury, Wilder could always use the "No intent to defame, just trash talking to sell a fight" defence.

Like i just noted in another thread on the same topic, pro fighters often accuse each other if cheating, PED abuse, paying off judges, etc, and it hardly ever gets taken seriously enough for lawyers to be brought in.

I can only recall that happening twice, and one of those cases did involve Wilder, funnily enough. He was counter sued for defamation by Povetkin over PED abuse accusations made during the fall out from their aborted fight. The other case I know about was Manny vs Floyd, but there may have been others.

[Skip Bayless]

wilder got what he wanted. he never wanted another fight but wanted fans to think fury was in the wrong, if he truly wanted a rematch he wouldn't have gone into hiding for 6 months then come out soon as the clause expires.

wilder went out like a biatch, his career is over.

[Marchegiano]

Don't know about anywhere else, but in the UK, intent to defame has to be established. That probably applies in the US too, because both countries use English Common Law as the basis of their judicial systems.

If he was sued by Fury, Wilder could always use the "No intent to defame, just trash talking to sell a fight" defence.

Like i just noted in another thread on the same topic, pro fighters often accuse each other if cheating, PED abuse, paying off judges, etc, and it hardly ever gets taken seriously enough for lawyers to be brought in.

I can only recall that happening twice, and one of those cases did involve Wilder, funnily enough. He was counter sued for defamation by Povetkin over PED abuse accusations made during the fall out from their aborted fight. The other case I know about was Manny vs Floyd, but there may have been others.

Yeah bud, you got me and seem to understand it better than I do. It's hard to prove intent.

[MoneyKasha]

Thats right you fraud, prove us right. You cant beat the champ in a fair-one so you got to find reasons to avoid the 'Bronze-Bomber' Deontay Wilder. RUN TYSON, RUN!!!

He did though.....