Tyson Fury: "Wilder will NEVER get another shot at me"

[kafkod]

Tyson Fury is number 1 in the world, but deep down? You know he is held to a lower standard than Anthony Joshua.

Both Wilder & Fury where held to low standards.

That's nonsense.

Fury drew with Wilder in the first fight - which almost everybody thinks he should have won - and crushed Deontay decisively in the rematch.

AJ was crushed by Ruiz in their first fight, and won by UD in the rematch.

If Fury is held to a lower standard than AJ, then why does he owe Wilder a 3rd fight, while AJ doesn't owe Andy anything? Makes no sense.

[MUNG]

i've always wanted to see III so this is a bit disappointing but money talks & this could change in the future

fury joshua is the fight to be made now, wilder messed up & the comedy saga will have to wait

[kafkod]

and if the WBC makes Wilder the mandatory for the WBC strap??? Not sure Fury would have a choice in the matter.

2 things for sure ...

1. Wilder won't become WBC mando for at least another year, by which time Fury will have either lost the title to AJ or become the undisputed champ.

2. Fury values his lineal status far more than any belt. If the WBC, or any of the other alphabet boys, order him to fight somebody he doesn't want to fight, he will ditch their belt without a second thought.

[GhostofDempsey]

F*** Wilder, he behaved like a straight b!tch since he lost. Every sorry excuse in the book and accusing Fury of cheating. Wilder deserves nothing. Bring on Fury vs AJ.

[REDEEMER]

That's nonsense.

Fury drew with Wilder in the first fight - which almost everybody thinks he should have won - and crushed Deontay decisively in the rematch.

AJ was crushed by Ruiz in their first fight, and won by UD in the rematch.

If Fury is held to a lower standard than AJ, then why does he owe Wilder a 3rd fight, while AJ doesn't owe Andy anything? Makes no sense.

I’d say Ruiz was not even a last minute replacement, he was about the 4th guy they got down to to save a card .

Wilder actually owes Fury for giving him his first PPV and most likely Wilder can’t do PPV anymore without him .

There’s a huge difference,one guy gave a huge PPV to Ruiz because several guys declined and the other was a cherry pick by the actual champion that was set up with months of planning .

If AJ had no title defenses would the forum be on him for it ? You know that answer . The double standard is Fury can fight soft touches and AJ cannot .

We also can’t ignore both Fury and Wilder decided to fight each other instead of AJ , so giving points to Fury for Wilder is only because Wilder declined AJ its not like it was in the hands of AJ to force the fight .

AJ wouldn’t owe Ruiz anything he was a stand in , Fury owes Wilder nothing as well it was a planned cherry pick in the first place and Fury is the A side .


Doing business with team Wilder always involves something shady so much they had to fire Lou Dibella who was more outspoken for Wilder then anyone , there’s always a reason those guys take fights ,now with no belt let them prove they are capable of beating some guys in their prime in the top 10, no one owes them anything is correct, they’ve milked the WBC for 5 years .

[Butt stuff]

Y'all must have different defame laws. If this was true our current President would make all his money in law suits.

Yeah but if someone called him a daft prick, he'd struggle to prove them wrong wouldn't he?

[DaNeutral.]

The thing is with all this talk here it isn't even Fury that turned the 3rd fight down. It was delayed twice due to Covid but Fury all set for the December date and it was Finkel who cancelled. It was TEAM WILDER who cancelled on team Fury.

I know they likely just wanted to wait Covid out so when it did happen it generated more money but Fury wanted to get back in the ring and wasn't prepared to wait any longer. He was willing to face Wilder in an empty stadium in December and Finkel said no.

[kafkod]

Yeah but if someone called him a daft prick, he'd struggle to prove them wrong wouldn't he?

That video of him talking to a bunch of black kids about his hairy legs that go blond in the sun would be hard to explain in any other way than .. "yeah, I am a daft prick, sorry folks"

[Marchegiano]

I'm not a lawyer, but I believe the way defamation law works is that if you make statements about a public figure which could have a negative impact on their reputation and/or livelihood, which you cannot substantiate or prove, then you are liable and can be sued. You can definitely be sued if you try to make money or advance your own career with statements like that.

Again, I'm not a lawyer, but I believe Wilder would be safe on the grounds that nobody who matters is going to take his ridiculous ramblings seriously, and the only person whose rep and livelihood could be negatively affected by them is Wilder himself.

I'm pretty sure we have different laws per regions. I'd be surprised if NYC has the same as FLA let alone FLA and UK.

That said, I was just making a joke really, but, here you do need to prove they knowingly and actively lied to damage. You have to prove they knew they were lying and only did it to hurt the other party. Here being Florida.

[Marchegiano]

Yeah but if someone called him a daft prick, he'd struggle to prove them wrong wouldn't he?

****ing hell

Fair