Should Mark Breland sue Deontay Wilder?
Collapse
-
You are arguing 2 separate points. The original post is about defamation from wilder towards breland alleging that he spiked wilder drink but here you are harping on wilder firing him... I dont think anyone is arguing if wilder has the fight to fire whoever he wants.
And if I was a boxer I would know and understand that the possibility of my Trainer stopping the fight if I am getting worked beyond belief is a real live possibility. Its how the sport works.Comment
-
It all stems from the firing.You are arguing 2 separate points. The original post is about defamation from wilder towards breland alleging that he spiked wilder drink but here you are harping on wilder firing him... I dont think anyone is arguing if wilder has the fight to fire whoever he wants.
And if I was a boxer I would know and understand that the possibility of my Trainer stopping the fight if I am getting worked beyond belief is a real live possibility. Its how the sport works.
Don't kid yourselfComment
-
Comment
-
All of this Breeland feelings comes from the firing.
No firing and the spike claim would get shrugged off.Comment
-
Comment
-
Agreed, fighters fire/switch trainers all the time. They NEVER accuse their own trainers of drugging them though, that is a criminal accusation and is taken seriously.Comment
-
It's not worth it. Wilder can fire off Breland for nothing and from all the interviews I've read he has suggested things about Breland more than outright accused him, not to a degree that would go in Brelands favour in court anyway.
And it hasn't done Brelands future job opportunities any harm either. Nobody other than a few sweaty racists on YouTube and their sheeple dumb followers are holding any stock in it. Everybody else knows how God damn ridiculous it is and knows Breland is legit and trustworthy.
The man's better off out of there, I read so much about his frustrations with Deontay and Deas over the years.Comment
-
Comment