How did Top Rank and Lomachenko fool so many of you?

[Boxing-1013]

If you say so.

I trust professional analysts way more than I trust a biased little fanboy like you.

Lol yeah nice projection bud.

Danny got the 'he's doing better than expected and isn't KOed or dominated' cards from a lot of people, UK pundits included. Combine that mindset with anyone who doesn't like GGG as well, and you have people finding rounds for Danny that weren't there.

When a guy overperforms relative to expectations, some people want to make the story that he was really in the fight, rather than just admitting he lost 8-4.

Mexican TV, come on. They would score any 12 round fight, at that time, against GGG.

Citing pundits' cards, or even worse, judges' cards, is not evidence of an outcome. Anyone can just watch the fight. If you find 7 rounds for Danny there you don't know what you're watching, or you're really really really trying to give him rounds he doesn't deserve.

[ShoulderRoll]

Lol yeah nice projection bud.

Danny got the 'he's doing better than expected and isn't KOed or dominated' cards from a lot of people, UK pundits included. Combine that mindset with anyone who doesn't like GGG as well, and you have people finding rounds for Danny that weren't there.

When a guy overperforms relative to expectations, some people want to make the story that he was really in the fight, rather than just admitting he lost 8-4.

Mexican TV, come on. They would score any 12 round fight, at that time, against GGG.

Citing pundits' cards, or even worse, judges' cards, is not evidence of an outcome. Anyone can just watch the fight. If you find 7 rounds for Danny there you don't know what you're watching, or you're really really really trying to give him rounds he doesn't deserve.

I see.

So we can't cite the cards of TV analysts or even judges.

Only the views of Boxing-1013 are to be trusted.

[Boxing-1013]

I see.

So we can't cite the cards of TV analysts or even judges.

Only the views of Boxing-1013 are to be trusted.

No we just have to have some intelligence to discern is anyone has an agenda when scoring certain fights. Not too difficult to understand, I'm sure you get it.

Look at all the terrible recent cards from judges for example. Obvious corruption in the sport sadly.

[glenn mcrory]

Lol I'm just calling out ******ity where I see it, and if I choose to. I see a lot of dumb comments on here and don't always reply. But sometimes the comments are so dumb that I have to reply and try to educate you fellas.

I literally have no idea what you're talking about re GGG. Anyone who knows how to score a fight would say the only close fight that went 12 in his career was vs Derevy. Canelo got beat 8-4 twice and so did Danny.

People really trying to push that he lost in those fights, lol. It exposes you man. But keep on keeping on bro. The thing is, if you really wanted to slight a guy like that, you could just keep it real. Say he didn't live up to expectations in those fights etc, and go from there.

But you guys are so simple that you can't even do that lol. You insist on trying to spin everything to the most extreme level. When you do it all the time for certain fighters, it exposes you bud. Do better.

Uh...
Might want to try saying this line without the mirror again buddy.

Yep, Golovkin literally can't lose unless you say so.
Everyone everywhere has always been so wrong.

No we just have to have some intelligence to discern is anyone has an agenda when scoring certain fights. Not too difficult to understand, I'm sure you get it.

Look at all the terrible recent cards from judges for example. Obvious corruption in the sport sadly.

You know that excludes you from these discussions right?

Time to log off eastern euro night pillow, the last 1, 2 of your heroes will be dealt with soon, your usefulness will be deemed obsolete, and you will be locked up in the gulags where you belong.

No more boxing for you, it'll probably be very the****utic for you.

[Boxing-1013]

Uh...
Might want to try saying this line without the mirror again buddy.

Yep, Golovkin literally can't lose unless you say so.
Everyone everywhere has always been so wrong.



You know that excludes you from these discussions right?

Time to log off eastern euro night pillow, the last 1, 2 of your heroes will be dealt with soon, your usefulness will be deemed obsolete, and you will be locked up in the gulags where you belong.

No more boxing for you, it'll probably be very the****utic for you.

Dude I don't have any heroes lol. I'm the sh.it in real life, I don't live through other men. I identify better with some current eastern euros more or less. They seem like good dudes and are pretty straight up about things and are great fighters. But I don't really give a sh.it if anyone wins or loses on the night.

That's why I like boxing. Let the best man win. I respect anyone who comes out on top on the night. For example I really respect Teo for his performance last night. Loma is a consummate pro so to beat him, you will have really earned it. Same way as GGG really. If anyone legit beats him I will give them full props, though to be fair GGG is aging.

I had Ouma basically tied with GGG before the KO. I wouldn't have scored it like that or even bring that fight up if I had some pro-GGG agenda. He has flaws like any fighter but has been undeniably great and should get more respect from his haters imho but it is what it is. That ship has sailed and who cares really.

You do though show your warped mindset, with your comments on eastern euro fighters. Who can hate on the current crop from eastern europe, or say that as a group they are all hype? lol. They are as solid as any group you could pick. They may lose some fights but the guy who beats them will earn it.

You 'your guy lost a fight or went 12 rounds' guys are really really weird man. Would love to take a look at what some you weirdos look like in real life. I'm sure I would laugh my fuc.king ass off lol

[Boxing-1013]

Uh...
Might want to try saying this line without the mirror again buddy.

Yep, Golovkin literally can't lose unless you say so.
Everyone everywhere has always been so wrong.



You know that excludes you from these discussions right?

Time to log off eastern euro night pillow, the last 1, 2 of your heroes will be dealt with soon, your usefulness will be deemed obsolete, and you will be locked up in the gulags where you belong.

No more boxing for you, it'll probably be very the****utic for you.

Let's see how real you keep it.

Can you name one fight that you scored against your perceived worldview?

For example, I scored Fury-Wilder 1 a draw. First 6 rounds were tight. Last 6 were all Fury but Wilder had 2 KDs. I saw a pretty obvious draw.

Loma was tied with Linares before the KO. He got max 5 rounds last night. GGG got 6 or maybe 7 vs Sergei but if someone legit gave Sergei 7 live I have no issue with that. Campbell got at least 4 and probably 5 but not 6 rounds vs Loma.

Let's see how real you keep it there buddy. Also how tall are you and what do you weigh? I want to see if we are in the same class.

[BoxingIsGreat]

Ill keep it real here, I never thought he was Floyd/Manny level but I thought he had potential to be a great. Shocking loss honestly, really makes him overrated in a sense to lose to someone like Lopez.

That's what I've been saying all along. Your post captures all my sentiments too. I once was a big Loma fan.

[Fists_of_Fury]

Anyone who clowns GGG Loma and Crawford...I mean why are you advertising that as indicative of your boxing knowledge? It exposes you as an idiot. But keep going, now we know lol.

The real idiot is the over hyping bunboys like you. Your boxing knowledge is lacking so you use the eye test and overrate hype jobs that lack resume and get exposed when they finally step up. GGG, Loma and Crawford all have weak resumes and are vastly overrated and over hyped. A clown like you gargles their jizz and calls them ATG and sheeit when their resume disproves it.

[BoxingIsGreat]

Stuff like this :

"Canelo...young green drained...Pac old waited him out should have fought 5 years earlier...Cotto good win but good style matchup...Gatti, really...Corralles good win...yeah a good list but hardly without some criticism. "

Have you ever applied those same standards to Lomachenko's resume?

I did. And you know how angry I made them. They say I'm the biggest Loma 'hater'!

I'd say the poster you are chatting with is cool, tho, beyond the former Loma insanity. We all have our days.

[Fists_of_Fury]

Lol I'm just calling out ******ity where I see it, and if I choose to. I see a lot of dumb comments on here and don't always reply. But sometimes the comments are so dumb that I have to reply and try to educate you fellas.

I literally have no idea what you're talking about re GGG. Anyone who knows how to score a fight would say the only close fight that went 12 in his career was vs Derevy. Canelo got beat 8-4 twice and so did Danny.

People really trying to push that he lost in those fights, lol. It exposes you man. But keep on keeping on bro. The thing is, if you really wanted to slight a guy like that, you could just keep it real. Say he didn't live up to expectations in those fights etc, and go from there.

But you guys are so simple that you can't even do that lol. You insist on trying to spin everything to the most extreme level. When you do it all the time for certain fighters, it exposes you bud. Do better.

8 to 4 for GGG in the Canelo rematch . Canelo beat the Mexican style out of the bum beater. What a clown