Comments Thread For: Jermall Charlo-Sergiy Derevyanchenko - Official Scorecards

[Boxing-1013]

Lol... That’s almost as bad as Byrd’s card TonyGe imagine that. The guy who doesn’t think GGG lost a fight outside of Derevychenko had GGG beating Canelo in the first fight 8 to 4.

This BS in itself incriminates you as Complete bias. I don’t know one expert, boxer or fan with an objective eye that would say that the fights weren’t close. Yet you somehow saw GGG win 8 in a near blow out?

Well guess what bro, the collaborative judges called it a draw. And the outrage about Byrd’s card and now TonyGe’s is anyone who saw it as a blow out for either fighter has no credibility whatsoever.

It is a conclusion that can not be drawn by any discerning eye unless completely contaminated by personal bias. You seem to think it was a clear 8 round to 4 win for GGG... GTFOH With your BA

Lol what world are you living in? Anyone who gave Canelo more than 4 rounds in fight 1 dksab. He got outlanded by about 50 punches in the fight, and got outlanded 10-1-1 in rounds. But it was a draw huh? Lol

If Canelo fought GGG's fight and GGG's Canelo in that fight, you would have scored it 10-2 for Canelo or sh.it maybe 12-0. Tony and I would have scored it 8-4 for Canelo.

You cannot be an objective boxing observer and act like Canelo was the better man or deserved a draw in fight 1. You just look like you have a serious agenda, for whatever reason who knows. I'm sure if someone perused your posts that agenda would become more clear.

Imagine saying a guy landing 50 more punches, and winning the punch count 10-1-1 in rounds has no business getting 8 rounds in a fight. What a bunch of losers this site has lol. Geez some are y'all are absolutely pathetic.

[Boxing-1013]

The ggg bait troll is back.
#1 hater of facts and personal opinion. Who cares if the facts don't support his opinion. He just states his opinion s as truth.

Derevy was a close fight. GGG got worked over for parts of that fight. Anyone acting like Canelo or Jacobs deserved more than 4 rounds in any 3 of those fights, I mean y'all are slow man. They just aren't there. It's OK though, you can still hate on GGG if you want to. There is ammo there if you really want to hate on the guy. Just pick some stuff that actually makes sense.

[Boxing-1013]

Most bad fighters, GGG is only 38 today. You guys wanted Floyd to move up practically two weight classes and fight GGG. Some how that was fair but GGG can hold a belt and not even fight the top guys in his division? Bro... your commentary is all over the place. In a vacuum it seems logical but pull out to the objective view and it’s a bunch biased double standards. There is no proof outside of his fans and media’s wavering eyeball test that GGG Would have been able to win had he fought Jacobs, Canelo and Derevychenko earlier. Him not blocking and walking through punches may have helped him get knocked out for the first time. In that case improved skills are showing up as declining prime. They are going to teach home to fight at Kronk. He will not be walking through punches.

So there is the answer - we have a Floyd Fan who had his feelings hurt by some criticisms of Floyd, so he takes it personal and lets it affect his analysis of 'other' fighters. What a real man you are lol. You're like a woman dude.

Don’t work that way,

And should of, could of, would of gets no play in a legit sport.

Lol... Once again GGG is a okay - good not great fighter

I'm curious as well - are you really illiterate or do you just think it is cool to seem illiterate?

[Fire4231]

Lol. Anyone who has those scores in those 4 fightsYou mean the entire boxing public outraged by the Jacobs score? You mean the Canelo judges for both fights not under scrutiny? You mean the entire boxing world who saw Derevychenko win? You mean even TonyGe who admitted in this thread Derevychenko beat GGG? The guy you jumped in to defend? You are a clown. , I mean you're a loser man. You either have no idea how to score a fight, or more likely - you score fights with your emotions because you desperately want to see vulnerability in the guy you don't like, so you can feel better about your self, as you have very poor self-esteem. This is a break through. You understand your issue. Now let’s stop projecting it on others.

It is people like you that make it less appealing to actually see the best fight the best. Yeah because you can’t depend on a fake decision to get your man crush a win. As if you want to see the best fight the best? GGG has been ducking everyone and you are still ride or die for him. Quit lying already. Trying to act decent. Because on your card, you will give it to your guy and against the other guy, regardless of what transpires in the ring.Says the guy that think GGG clearly won Jacobs, both Canelo’s and Derevychenko... sigh miss me with this dribble.

Hagler has a great win over (the smaller at that time, moving up in weight) Hearns. Going life and death with Duran and getting schooled by SRL are hardly feathers in his cap, at that weight class. The rest of his resume is hardly exemplary, especially when you factor in the blights on there which came against very average opposition.You are about to get kicked right the **** off Boxingscene. This may be the most casual commentary ever. Not even going to address it. This is too delusional and ridiculous. Please say these ridiculous things in front of any fighter and you just might knocked out. Mike Tyson is a good guy to test your logic. Go ahead try it out. Write into Breadman, tell him your theory on how Hagler was a soft touch?

Keep being a fanboy though man, the sport is full of him. Do you. You are entitled to your woefully bad opinions and takes on fights/fighters. You probably think Ward-Kovalev 1 was a close/either way type fight too, huh? Lol

Bro you may just be an idiot. I mean in a very technical way you just may qualify as an idiot. This stuff is not worth the reply. Either get up to speed, get out the sport or go back through that worm hole to the place where your thoughts make sense.

[TonyGe]

Lol... That’s almost as bad as Byrd’s card TonyGe imagine that. The guy who doesn’t think GGG lost a fight outside of Derevychenko had GGG beating Canelo in the first fight 8 to 4.

This BS in itself incriminates you as Complete bias. I don’t know one expert, boxer or fan with an objective eye that would say that the fights weren’t close. Yet you somehow saw GGG win 8 in a near blow out?

Well guess what bro, the collaborative judges called it a draw. And the outrage about Byrd’s card and now TonyGe’s is anyone who saw it as a blow out for either fighter has no credibility whatsoever.

It is a conclusion that can not be drawn by any discerning eye unless completely contaminated by personal bias. You seem to think it was a clear 8 round to 4 win for GGG... GTFOH With your BA

It was 8-4 and Bryrd's card was a disgrace. Canelo's tactic of going to the ropes and waiting for good counterpunching opportunities was a disaster.

[Boxing-1013]

Bro you may just be an idiot. I mean in a very technical way you just may qualify as an idiot. This stuff is not worth the reply. Either get up to speed, get out the sport or go back through that worm hole to the place where your thoughts make sense.

Hey man keep trolling, it's a free country.

[Fire4231]

So there is the answer - we have a Floyd Fan who had his feelings hurt by some criticisms of Floyd, so he takes it personal and lets it affect his analysis of 'other' fighters. What a real man you are lol. You're like a woman dude.
Lol... Yep I am a fan of the sport and Floyd has been one of the best I have seen in this era? Every expert worth anything will say the same. Are you saying you don’t believe he was a great fighter.

And bro really... you seem like the type to try to become a woman every night. If you think I am like a woman what kind of woman are you ****ing with? 😂😂😂😂 Too Eazy!!!





I'm curious as well - are you really illiterate or do you just think it is cool to seem illiterate?

Bro you are corny as **** and desperate to find leverage outside of your nonexistent boxing knowledge. We know one thing you are not boxing literate, casual @ss man ******.

[Boxing-1013]

sigh miss me with this dribble.

Again, are you intentionally being an idiot, or are you really that ******? 'Dribble' lololol

[Boxing-1013]

Bro you are corny as **** and desperate to find leverage outside of your nonexistent boxing knowledge. We know one thing you are not boxing literate, casual @ss man ******.

You're just a fanboy dude. No big deal. There are a lot of them. Keep doing your thing and supporting your guys. That's human nature. But if you then try and argue from a position of intellectual superiority, while clearly being a fanboy, and clearly being intellectually deficient, why then yes, I will drag you around on here.

Read a book man.

[Fire4231]

Lol what world are you living in? This one, the one you are not attached to. Anyone who gave Canelo more than 4 rounds in fight 1 dksab. You mean the judges and all the boxing media?

He got outlanded by about 50 punches in the fight, and got outlanded 10-1-1 in rounds. But it was a draw huh? Lol What does boxing record say? Or is your opinion going to restructure reality Man Tran?

If Canelo fought GGG's fight and GGG's Canelo in that fight, you would have scored it 10-2 for Canelo or sh.it maybe 12-0. Tony and I would have scored it 8-4 for Canelo. GGG couldn’t do what Canelo did, he is not skilled enough.

You cannot be an objective boxing observer and act like Canelo was the better man or deserved a draw in fight 1. Yes I can and so can two of the judges and every boxing writer.

You just look like you have a serious agenda, for whatever reason who knows.The agenda is the truth. I'm sure if someone perused your posts that agenda would become more clear. Peruse away you may actually learn about boxing agenda driven man Tran.[/B]

Imagine saying a guy landing 50 more punches, and winning the punch count 10-1-1 in rounds has no business getting 8 rounds in a fight. What a bunch of losers this site has lol. Geez some are y'all are absolutely pathetic.

Lol... now the whole site is against you agenda based Man Tran. You are contradicting everyone including@TonyGE. You are by in far one of the dumbest guys on this site. No wonder you are having a hard time fitting in.