Comments Thread For: Jermall Charlo-Sergiy Derevyanchenko - Official Scorecards

[Fire4231]

Yeah its the same thing.

Lol... Once again GGG is a okay - good fighter. But if he is on Haglers level let’s see it. Atleast fight Charlo or Andrade and beat them.

But we all know that won’t happen fan protection. Why because he couldn’t beat Jacobs, Canelo or Derevychenko. Clowns always fall in love with the bearded lady. But just because you put a beard on it... it doesn’t mean she is the man.

[Fire4231]

Anyone who says that any fight for GGG other than Dervy wasn't a clear win, either DKSAB or, more likely, they have a serious axe to grind with him. You can underperform relative to (some) expectations but still clearly win. Happens all the time in boxing/sports.

His legacy is this... every time he stepped up it was a loss and a gift decision. He should have lost by a round to Jacobs, he had a draw with Canelo moving up, he lost by at least a round or two with Canelo in the second fight and Derevychenko looked to beat him by two to three rounds. He avoided Lara, Andrade, Charlo, Ward, Billy Joe Sanders and evening Chris’s Eubank. All fighters with Power who can move.

The difference is I score the fights, clearly you just watch the guy you like and look for reasons to justify a win no matter what.

Is this secretly Jim Lampley?

[TonyGe]

Lol... Once again GGG is a okay - good fighter. But if he is on Haglers level let’s see it. Atleast fight Charlo or Andrade and beat them.

But we all know that won’t happen fan protection. Why because he couldn’t beat Jacobs, Canelo or Derevychenko. Clowns always fall in love with the bearded lady. But just because you put a beard on it... it doesn’t mean she is the man.

The only fight I and a lot of other people had him losing is the Derevyanchenko fight. For a fighter that's well past prime that's a very good result. I don't know if it's intentional or not but you just don't get it.

[Fire4231]

The only fight I and a lot of other people had him losing is the Derevyanchenko fight. For a fighter that's well past prime that's a very good result. I don't know if it's intentional or not but you just don't get it.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/fanside...el-jacobs/amp/

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.sbn...n-championship

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.usa...m/amp/99376670

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.for...-weigh-in/amp/

https://itrboxing.com/2017/03/18/gen...cision-jacobs/

https://pro*************.com/ggg-rem...daniel-jacobs/

Really your clownship? You can’t erase history. Every one of these articles written a day after Jacobs must have all been under the same delusion? That’s what I pulled up immediately. I guess the writers didn’t get it either? Are we all in on the counter to your delusion? What about the Judges score cards in Canelo II? You do know he lost the second fight right? Was the first not a draw?

Stop, you and “alot of other people,” just look biased as ****. GGG is a stud against light punching boxers and flat footed punchers. He simply can’t beat a good strong boxer puncher fairly. So why would he be all time great in anything. He had a type that he couldn’t seem to overcome. The combination of who he lost against and ducked seems to neatly support this. What else you got fan protection?

[Dontbeahater]

The only fight I and a lot of other people had him losing is the Derevyanchenko fight. For a fighter that's well past prime that's a very good result. I don't know if it's intentional or not but you just don't get it.

The ggg bait troll is back.
#1 hater of facts and personal opinion. Who cares if the facts don't support his opinion. He just states his opinion s as truth.

[TonyGe]

His legacy is this... every time he stepped up it was a loss and a gift decision. He should have lost by a round to Jacobs, he had a draw with Canelo moving up, he lost by at least a round or two with Canelo in the second fight and Derevychenko looked to beat him by two to three rounds. He avoided Lara, Andrade, Charlo, Ward, Billy Joe Sanders and evening Chris’s Eubank. All fighters with Power who can move.

The difference is I score the fights, clearly you just watch the guy you like and look for reasons to justify a win no matter what.

Is this secretly Jim Lampley?

I think you are delusional. Golovkin clearly beat Canelo in the first fight. I scored it 8-4 for him. The second fight was closer but I had him winning that one. Canelo is a good fighter but he's no Roberto Duran.

[TonyGe]

https://www.google.com/amp/s/fanside...el-jacobs/amp/

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.sbn...n-championship

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.usa...m/amp/99376670

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.for...-weigh-in/amp/

https://itrboxing.com/2017/03/18/gen...cision-jacobs/

https://pro*************.com/ggg-rem...daniel-jacobs/

Really your clownship? You can’t erase history. Every one of these articles written a day after Jacobs must have all been under the same delusion? That’s what I pulled up immediately. I guess the writers didn’t get it either? Are we all in on the counter to your delusion? What about the Judges score cards in Canelo II? You do know he lost the second fight right? Was the first not a draw?

Stop, you and “alot of other people,” just look biased as ****. GGG is a stud against light punching boxers and flat footed punchers. He simply can’t beat a good strong boxer puncher fairly. So why would he be all time great in anything. He had a type that he couldn’t seem to overcome. The combination of who he lost against and ducked seems to neatly support this. What else you got fan protection?

I don't have anyone on fan protection or else I would be posting that he beat Derevyanchenko not losing. For every article you post pro Jacobs there are ones indicating Golovkin beat him. So I guess my question to you is why are you so anti Golovkin?? What other fighters do YOU have on your hit list??

[TonyGe]

The ggg bait troll is back.
#1 hater of facts and personal opinion. Who cares if the facts don't support his opinion. He just states his opinion s as truth.

Look who's talking. LOL..

[Fire4231]

I think you are delusional. Golovkin clearly beat Canelo in the first fight. I scored it 8-4 for him. The second fight was closer but I had him winning that one. Canelo is a good fighter but he's no Roberto Duran.

Lol... That’s almost as bad as Byrd’s card TonyGe imagine that. The guy who doesn’t think GGG lost a fight outside of Derevychenko had GGG beating Canelo in the first fight 8 to 4.

This BS in itself incriminates you as Complete bias. I don’t know one expert, boxer or fan with an objective eye that would say that the fights weren’t close. Yet you somehow saw GGG win 8 in a near blow out?

Well guess what bro, the collaborative judges called it a draw. And the outrage about Byrd’s card and now TonyGe’s is anyone who saw it as a blow out for either fighter has no credibility whatsoever.

It is a conclusion that can not be drawn by any discerning eye unless completely contaminated by personal bias. You seem to think it was a clear 8 round to 4 win for GGG... GTFOH With your BA

[Boxing-1013]

No I read it, GGG’s comp has not been on Hagler’s comp level and he still can’t win. Shut up clown.

His legacy is this... every time he stepped up it was a loss and a gift decision. He should have lost by a round to Jacobs, he had a draw with Canelo moving up, he lost by at least a round or two with Canelo in the second fight and Derevychenko looked to beat him by two to three rounds. He avoided Lara, Andrade, Charlo, Ward, Billy Joe Sanders and evening Chris’s Eubank. All fighters with Power who can move.

The difference is I score the fights, clearly you just watch the guy you like and look for reasons to justify a win no matter what.

Is this secretly Jim Lampley?

Lol. Anyone who has those scores in those 4 fights, I mean you're a loser man. You either have no idea how to score a fight, or more likely - you score fights with your emotions because you desperately want to see vulnerability in the guy you don't like, so you can feel better about your self, as you have very poor self-esteem.

It is people like you that make it less appealing to actually see the best fight the best. Because on your card, you will give it to your guy and against the other guy, regardless of what transpires in the ring.

Hagler has a great win over (the smaller at that time, moving up in weight) Hearns. Going life and death with Duran and getting schooled by SRL are hardly feathers in his cap, at that weight class. The rest of his resume is hardly exemplary, especially when you factor in the blights on there which came against very average opposition.

Keep being a fanboy though man, the sport is full of him. Do you. You are entitled to your woefully bad opinions and takes on fights/fighters. You probably think Ward-Kovalev 1 was a close/either way type fight too, huh? Lol