Are Fury and Joshua better all time than Klitschko Bro's?

[Sadiqkingofko]

Before you guys attach lets compare best wins

Fury has Wlad who was coming off 18 title defenses and Wilder coming off 10 title defenses

Joshua beat Wlad, Povetkin, Parker, Ruiz, and Whyte

I think they both have better resumes, and Wlad never gave Sanders or Purrity a rematch like Joshua did to Ruiz, and the brewster rematch happened 3 years later, so let me know guys

[champion4ever]

No, they both have a ways to go; Especially Tyson Fury. His resume doesn't quite stack up with the Klitschko boys.

[ThunderFists]

Aj has Parker and whyte are just above avg. Everyone else he has fought is washed up or overated he fought washed up povetkin who was beat by wlad in his prime, he is fighting pulev who is 40, another fighter who was beat in his prime by wlad

Wlad had povetkin , bryd, haye, pulev, mormeck, jennings, chambers and ray mercer.

Fury has chisora wlad wilder and if haye didnt pull out twice he would have haye on there as well. Let say he also beats aj as hes the favourite thats a respectable resume

[Kezzer]

Fury’s resume is pathetic. Joshua has a decent one.

Both have time in their careers to improve (or ruin ��) though

[4truth]

Not impossible that some time in the future we might look back and say that but not at this time, no.

[Toffee]

James Douglas has an amazing 'best win'. All time great?

Fury isn't in the all time great conversation at the moment. If he retired right now he'd be in the "what might have been" conversation.

[LoadedWraps]

I truly believe Fury will be remembered as the greatest fighter to ever step in a ring.

[KingOfGlory]

James Douglas has an amazing 'best win'. All time great?

Fury isn't in the all time great conversation at the moment. If he retired right now he'd be in the "what might have been" conversation.

Yep. Wlad has the second most title defenses of all time. It's not even close.

[REDEEMER]

AJ unified in 19 fights and has already fought more legit guys in top 10 ? However you can’t call him an ATG though he will bec one while still boxing I figure like Wlad.

Fury ? He’ll lose to AJ and if he doesn’t fight him he may still retire after a few deference’s so it’s not really warranting to have him near ATG unless he accomplished at least one of the two , defeat AJ or make some title defenses.


The Klitschko brothers played the long game and have multiple title defenses ,I don’t believe Vitali would be looked as a more accomplished fighter at AJ explosive fast track he’s having , Wlad on the other hand is more ATG status for title defenses but it’s not a big margin to what both achieved so far .

[boliodogs]

Before you guys attach lets compare best wins

Fury has Wlad who was coming off 18 title defenses and Wilder coming off 10 title defenses

Joshua beat Wlad, Povetkin, Parker, Ruiz, and Whyte

I think they both have better resumes, and Wlad never gave Sanders or Purrity a rematch like Joshua did to Ruiz, and the brewster rematch happened 3 years later, so let me know guys

Why ask a question if you already are sure you know the answer. The only reason is to force your opinion on others. I think the K brothers are better fighters and have better resumes. Wlad gave AJ hell when he was 40 and AJ was 27. Vitali was never knocked down in his entire career. Your thread reads who is better but it should read AJ and Fury are better because I say so. Wlad was 39 when he lost to 27 year old Fury. 39 is way past prime. Let's see how good AJ and Fury are at age 39 if they are still fighting.