Are Fury and Joshua better all time than Klitschko Bro's?
Collapse
-
Obviously neither are currently there, the Klitschkos were utterly dominant for a hell of a long time even if they ruled over a very poor division. Fury I think has the potential to be as good or even better than the Klitschkos if he hangs around and sees off all comers, but honestly, if he beats Joshua I don't think he'll bother, I get the feeling that there'll be no fight that's big enough after that for it to be worth him hanging around and he'll retire. Joshua I think is just too limited to ever become as truly dominant as either one of the Klitschkos. I think he'll hang around and will probably end up being top dog for a fair while regardless of whether he wins against Fury or not, but it'll only be a matter of time after that until some younger and hungrier contender deposes him.Comment
-
According to the members on this boxing forum your statement is absolutely correct. They say that all Deontay Wilder has ever beaten was cab drivers and construction workers. So what does that say about Tyson Fury's win over him? It makes it look bad. It discredits his win over him.Comment
-
I’m glad you agreeAccording to the members on this boxing forum your statement is absolutely correct. They say that all Deontay Wilder has ever beaten was cab drivers and construction workers. So what does that say about Tyson Fury's win over him? It makes it look bad. It discredits his win over him.Comment
-
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Too bad Fury dominated Wlad worse than Floyd dominated JMM.
Fury has a win so heavy clout wise, legacy wise, we might not see a win so significant for the next 30 years.Comment

Comment