Why did Floyd get bullied by Maidana

[aboutfkntime]

Old man. I personally got into that argument with you so I know exactly where I stand.

oh, REALLY... ?


did you REALLY not think I can EASILY prove that I am a fan of any particular fighter?


what a fkn moron LMAO


kid, this is how you use the search function...

Who Are The Current Fighters In Boxing: You Consider "Special"
special... as-in, the true boxing meaning of that word... ?

or, just... I like dem doe " special " ... ?

Lomachenko, Canelo, Inoue, Crawford... there is nobody else

on the up, I like Haney and Stevenson
https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/s...o#post20131081

this is simple, and has already been addressed many times

FACT: P4P has nothing to do with resume... it just doesn't

ATG = resume

P4P = style/skills/form

nobody in their right mind would rate Pac over Crawford at welter

I am sure Crawford would be a significant favorite if that fight got made

if P4P = resume... then Pac would be #1... but, he is not...
if P4P = resume... Golovkin would not be ranked P4P

those two examples prove that resume is not the main criteria in P4P

resume is given a small consideration for P4P, but nothing more

e.g.

people rank Canelo #1, simply because of his resume

I disagree

I think if Canelo, Lomachenko, and Crawford, were all NATURALLY the same size... so, nobody moving up/down, no catchweights etc... I have no idea who would win, but would probably favor both Loma and Crawford over Canelo... simply because of style

before Canelo/Golovkin II, I did not have Canelo in the top 5... despite his outstanding resume
https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/s...o#post20693441

I don't think there was a problem with Benavidez leg

he has always been a good fighter, even back when he was a kid

same with his brother

when David was 14yo he was a fat 240lb kid who sparred heavyweights

he would touch them up

I would also favor Mikey Garcia over all of the guys you mentioned... he used to beat the shlt out of Maidana, make him look like a B-grade fighter... Mikey sparred HEAPS of welters, he was beating up 147 lb'ers back when he was a featherweight... but yea, he should be cleaning out 140

Crawford is a phenomenal fighter, his critics are tripping

but he could go the Bradley route... Tim was a excellent fighter who would rock with anyone, and he always found a way to win... but his competition slipped off, and Bradley is 100% responsible/accountable for that...

" because of boxing politics, I may not fight the best "
~ Bradley, shortly after signing with Top Rank

Crawford is 100% responsible/accountable for his legacy, just like everyone else

he has heard the criticism... just like Bradley, just like Crawford, just like Golovkin... they all heard the criticism

I have heard people compare Crawford to Leonard... well ok, it was Arum... but some are real big on Crawford style/skillset... me being one of them... and I definitely think that would be a great matchup head-to-head... Crawford would give anyone fits, Ray would have his hands full... but very few punters would bet against Leonard at 147 after he passed that Hearns exam... only a small handful of fighters would seriously be in that conversation, are none of them are named Crawford

Crawford needs to either... build that legacy, or be just another excellent fighter who was comfortable being famous in Nebraska

hard luck for him if he waits

Crawford and Lomachenko are the best fighters in the world imo... but yea, fcuk them both if they sit on their hands hiding behind Arum's skirt like Tim Bradley did... at least Mikey stood up to Arum and refused shltty fights with no legacy value

Canelo is definitely right up there, and he has the best credentials by far... but based on... 1) ceteris paribus... 2) style/skills/form... because they are the very essence of P4P... I go with Crawford and Lomachenko

not sure which of those guys are the absolute best, that is very difficult to pick... we have not seen either of them tested enough at this point... which was the issue when matching Crawford up with SRL earlier, and is the reason why fans lean toward Canelo... and in a matchup head-to-head, it is very difficult to gauge exactly how their styles would mesh after the 3rd/4th round once each fighter started to adjust... change it up/tweak, build on what is working, settle in... not sure tbh

I agree that 'if all things were equal' (ceteris paribus)... so, natural size/weight, nobody going up/down... that Canelo would be right in those matchups as well... but I slightly favor my other guys... Canelo is more proven, and solid as a rock, extremely well-rounded... but I suspect that both Loma/Crawford may have a slightly higher ceiling... having the same-level skills/IQ as Canelo, but with unique styles... Loma being more unconventional and multi-dimensional, Crawford being one of few fighters who effectively switch and are equally adept at both... very few fighters do that effectively, and 99% should never try

but there is not much in it, all of them are right in that conversation
https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/s...o#post20186274

same as why all the others get criticized...

either...

1) genuine lack of appreciation for the game
2) genuine lack of knowledge for the game
3) Salido is a useful bat for the anti-Loma brigade

that list is in no particular order, I see #3 happen a lot

Salido was basic, and he learned his craft on the job... but the guy was about as tough as you can get, and a real handful for anyone

the Loma thing was shocking matchmaking, Arum cut corners

Arum cut corners... because he 100% KNEW that Loma was special... but... FACT: you do not cut corners in boxing, because there are PLENTY of big tough veteran speed-bumps in this game

Q. trying to build a star, preparing his second fight... who do you NOT select... who would be the WORST opponent for a 1-fight rookie?

A. you do not select a... TOUGH... HARD... VETERAN... one who will definitely be there for 12 HARD rounds... and especially not a tough hard veteran who could easily come in overweight

read that description... and then look who they picked

Arum counted on Lomachenko's next-level skillset to carry him through... and don't forget, it nearly did... but you do not cut corners in boxing

Arum blew it

I get that they were confident, and I get that they had high aspirations... but they should have waited 12-18 months before taking on all comers, and let Loma settle into his work as a pro... the corner they cut was too sharp, plain and simple
https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/s...o#post20186274

P4P is subjective... and highly over-rated imo...

Inoue leapfrogged Lomachenko, Crawford, and Canelo... after being exposed a little, by an old Donaire who dropped TWO divisions in the last year-or-so? ...

I have him a solid #4

Usyk, I love the guy... excellent fighter, and excellent guy... but he is one fight away from possibly being removed from the list entirely

Usyk beat 2x unproven guys, and thats it... I still remember what happened in the Bellew fight, Usyk did not look like a P4P fighter at all

not sure whats up there... I wish him all the best, but not sure how successful he will be at heavyweight

and Golovkin still on the list, after losing to Canelo and probably losing to Derevyanchenko... ?

I think there will be some " adjustments " over the next 12 months

I have the top 4...
Crawford/Lomachenko... #1 and #2, no particular order
Canelo
Inoue

I still have Canelo/Inoue one top win away from earning the top spot

Crawford needs to do something

because of his inactivity against anyone worth a damn, in 12 months I can see...
1) Canelo
2) Lomachenko
3) Inoue
4) Crawford
https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/s...o#post20195878

yep, I hear ya... fair call

P4P is a little over-rated

and, Barrera and Canelo do that to everyone

Crawford and Lomachenko are about as real as you can get
https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/s...o#post20255018

currently.... Crawford has the weakest resume

but, he is probably the best fighter in the world

P4P is obviously not based on resume... the silly casuals always insist that resume is the determining factor, but it is only a consideration

on style/skills/form, the main considerations... Crawford is the man

the only real arguments are Lomachenko and Canelo

Lomachenko is simply phenomenal

Canelo is outstanding, with HUGE balls and the best resume by far

my current list would be...
1) Crawford
2) Lomachenko
3) Canelo

I got no problem with anyone mixing that list up, and will not argue at this point

there is nothing in it
https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/s...o#post20336351

GRATZ LOMA !!

he is a worthy recipient

it is natural that the best P4P fighters become the Franchise Champion

Spence and Usyk will become a Franchise Champion next

Golovkin wasn't quite good enough to become a Franchise Champion


https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/s...o#post20141309

like I said from the start...

1) I am a huge Loma fan
2) you are just another shlt-talking butt-monkey

[IronDanHamza]

That fight convinced me that Duran would've destroyed Floyd.

I only saw it once and I thought it was a draw.

Well, is that news? That Duran beats a 37 year old Floyd? I assume you mean prime Duran?

How does a prime Floyd do against a 37 year old Duran? Quite well if I had to guess.

It’s apples and oranges.

[Roadblock]

Well, is that news? That Duran beats a 37 year old Floyd? I assume you mean prime Duran?

How does a prime Floyd do against a 37 year old Duran? Quite well if I had to guess.

It’s apples and oranges.

Yep imagination warps reality.

Why did Laing beat Duran, why did Mugabi push Hagler so much, why did Manny get KOed by B graders and saved by the ref from a B grader, why did Lomo get dropped these things happen in boxing all the time, Ive seen many great fighters have real battles and upsets from a dark horse that was not supposed to be a threat but was really pumped for it and fought out of their skin, its not relative to how a great will perform when they a super motivated.

Fans imagine all their fondest memories and visualization of some great and translate that against another great in a war with quality fighters just not superstars.

Floyd could beat any fighter in history his weight, and he could also lose, this applys to them all, fans for the most part are romancing their fav fighters and not being realistic based on boxing.

[R-Hand Southpaw]

oh, REALLY... ?


did you REALLY not think I can EASILY prove that I am a fan of any particular fighter?


what a fkn moron LMAO


kid, this is how you use the search function...























































like I said from the start...

1) I am a huge Loma fan
2) you are just another shlt-talking butt-monkey

All from 2019+ and yes I know because I actually clicked on all the links

Lmfaooooooooooooo

Im talking about a time before then. So much for showing me. FAIL.

[R-Hand Southpaw]

oh, REALLY... ?


did you REALLY not think I can EASILY prove that I am a fan of any particular fighter?


what a fkn moron LMAO


kid, this is how you use the search function...























































like I said from the start...

1) I am a huge Loma fan
2) you are just another shlt-talking butt-monkey

When you learn to read come back with better results

Help a brother out. Help me find some forum threads from 2017-2018 so I can bust your lying ass.

[JakeTheBoxer]

Well, is that news? That Duran beats a 37 year old Floyd? I assume you mean prime Duran?

How does a prime Floyd do against a 37 year old Duran? Quite well if I had to guess.

It’s apples and oranges.

Prime Floyd is a super featherweight. 38 old Duran won a middleweight title against Barkley.

Yes, I believe 38 old Duran would destroy prime Floyd. Floyd would just be far too small.

[aboutfkntime]

When you learn to read come back with better results

you need to change your name to left-hand...





evidence supplied by you:
0

evidence supplied by me:
truckloads

[The tucker]

MAidana was fighting dirty as hell in that fight.

[R-Hand Southpaw]

you need to change your name to left-hand...





evidence supplied by you:
0

evidence supplied by me:
truckloads

Im right handed lmfao.

And evidence you provided? ZERO

Not sure when you decided to become "Lomachenkos biggest fan" but did you provide proof from when I specified?

Definitely wasn't back when I specified now was it?

NO

Yet here you are celebrating that fact lmfao!

Me: help me find threads from 2017-2018

You: 2019 checkmate

Lmfaooooooooooooo

[whollisboxing]

True but 8 months before Floyd schooled a bigger/younger Canelo.

Bigger and younger? Yes, however Canelo doesn't fight anything like Marcos Maidana. Canelo is a counter-puncher by nature whereas Maidana just attacks and swarms you. Also, sometimes a guy simply has a great night. If anything Maidana deserves credit for pushing Floyd as much as he did and Mayweather deserves credit for clearing things up in the rematch.