Comments Thread For: Hearn Reacts To Arum, Warren: Fury Can't Avoid Whyte Mandatory

[Jkp]

Take your mandatory out of the way and do the big fight. Is that too difficult to achieve?

Yes it is. There's 4 belts, it's literally impossible to satisfy all mandatories, unless you think he's gonna fight 5 times a year.

[Jkp]

Fury doesn't, he's avoiding Whyte like the plague. Wilder did the same. I don't know why but Fury really doesn't want to fight Whyte.

Not an easy fight at all. Whyte has only ever been beaten once as a pro.

Lol. You wish.

Truth is whytes c grade ass is completely insignificant to the top guys.

But would love to see him get flattened again.

[Blackstarr]

Yes it is. There's 4 belts, it's literally impossible to satisfy all mandatories, unless you think he's gonna fight 5 times a year.

What the hell are you talking about - Fury only has 1 belt and won’t be fighting for the others until next summer at the very earliest.

A mandatory fight against Whyte won’t get in the way, especially as it’s looking doubtful we’ll get the Fury-Wilder fight any time soon.

Should Fury not fulfil his mandatory so as not to jeopardise an undisputed fight, as WBC will be forced to strip him otherwise through threat of legal action?

[Blackstarr]

Lol. You wish.

Truth is whytes c grade ass is completely insignificant to the top guys.

But would love to see him get flattened again.

Then stop ****ting on a Fury mandatory defence against Whyte if that’s the case.

If fights against Schwarz and Wallin are significant enough for Fury, then a mandatory defence against a top-5 opponent while the AJ fight materialises damn well is.

[JakeTheBoxer]

Again, Whyte is very fair contender and I believe Fury should fight him. But Whyte struggles every time against everybody. I see zero chance he beats Fury. Should be safe fight for Tyson.

[Jkp]

Then stop ****ting on a Fury mandatory defence against Whyte if that’s the case.

If fights against Schwarz and Wallin are significant enough for Fury, then a mandatory defence against a top-5 opponent while the AJ fight materialises damn well is.

I'm Not against him fighting Whyte. I'm against him fighting Whyte so AJ can avoid the fight. It's the usual Eddie Hearn stalling... and protecting AJ

[removed]

Matchroom fanboys are desperate for Fury to fight Whyte because they know he destroys their idol AJ and they want him to hold onto his paper titles for a while longer.

Only a fool would rather see Fury-Whyte than Fury-AJ. Dillian Whyte is a bum.

[Angeljuice]

More revisionist history I see. It was your boy AJ who ducked Wilder by first hiding behind Dillian Whyte and when that failed. He sent Wilder a blank post-dated contract to sign with no opponent, date or venue because he was afraid of being chinned by him. When Team Wilder requested for him to fill out the details he ran with his tail tucked between his legs and fought Povetkin instead. What a cowardly act on his part and Matchroom Sport?

So you buy the version of the story where Wilder (who avoided every other champion and top heavyweight and has never beaten a top class boxer) was really up for fighting AJ (who has collected belts, fought champions and faced the best).

How can you believe that BS? What you see with your eyes should overrule the PR hype from the cowards camp.

Have you ever seen Wilder fight a top fighter (other than Fury) ? Nope, because he hasn't faced a single one.
AJ has never avoided anybody, he fought Klitschko (Wilder wouldn't), Parker for the belt (Wilder was fighting nobodies). He even offered $100m to fight Wilder twice.

Wilder then wouldn't fight AJ because he had an important fight with a 40 something nobody with a heart condition? Seriously?

I'm sorry, I'm just too intelligent to be fooled by a cowards words. Actions speak louder than words and Wilder has not fought anybody of note since turning pro, then he fights Fury twice and loses twice. How blind do you have to be not to see the truth?

[Blackstarr]

I'm Not against him fighting Whyte. I'm against him fighting Whyte so AJ can avoid the fight. It's the usual Eddie Hearn stalling... and protecting AJ

I’m not sure how this makes sense either - as I’ve said, the AJ-Fury fight won’t be until next summer at the earliest so a Fury-Whyte fight shouldn’t get in the way or stall anything.

Also, the world doesn’t revolve around AJ. Hearn is Whyte’s promoter as well and has a fiduciary duty to push for his mandatory shot, just as Arum is doing with Pulev - what’s difficult to comprehend here?

[Angeljuice]

I'm Not against him fighting Whyte. I'm against him fighting Whyte so AJ can avoid the fight. It's the usual Eddie Hearn stalling... and protecting AJ

Utter crap. Whyte has been number 1 contender for years, he has to fight Fury before AJ does as he is the mandatory challenger.

AJ doesn't want to avoid Fury at all, he's looking forward to proving a lot of people wrong. It's Wilder that refused to fight any class adversaries, not AJ.
AJ has fought everyone he can to try to unify the belts. He even fought champions for belts!!! Imagine that.

Wilder said for five years that he wanted to unify, then avoided all champions and contenders and just fought bums (how do you win belts if you're too scared to fight for them?).