Originally posted by Dr_Cynical
Prime Felix "Tito" Trinidad
Collapse
-
Yes better than SRL...Tito didnt lose a fight until he stepped up to MW..He literally destroyed every single fight put in front of his, while only fight the best...SRL was nice as hell but Tito has him...He is not over nothing...just check his track record..it speaks without words being spoken..Originally posted by Dr_CynicalBetter than Sugar Ray Leonard?
How can you say that?
That's what I'm talking about when I say he's overrated and overhyped.Comment
-
See? Here we go with that bull**** about him destroying everyone he's faced.Originally posted by Rosewood_htownYes better than SRL...Tito didnt lose a fight until he stepped up to MW..He literally destroyed every single fight put in front of his, while only fight the best...SRL was nice as hell but Tito has him...He is not over nothing...just check his track record..it speaks without words being spoken..
I suppose in your mind he destroyed Oscar, Hopkins, and Wright, correct?
Comment
-
Oh right, you spend your time digging through my posts and make a post about it yet it's not directed towards me?Originally posted by gerardofprAint nothing wrong with that post. Like I said, msg was directed are you, why you reply if it wasn't directed at you? Who's the sensitive little *****? Just wanted to show the fellows a pattern, that's it. Carry on!!! LOL
Whatever kid.
Why do you keep on with this bull****?
You're making no sense and whatever it is you've set out to accomplish, you haven't.
You're failing, as usual.Comment
-
Look Tito was a good fighter, but come on better than SRL...not a chance. And he struggled against DLH even if you think he won (which I don't think he did). Also what other tough fights did he take below MW? He didn't look so invincible against Vargas... in fact if he doesn't use a low blow he probably would have been KO'd. Take Tito for what he is/was... a good WW with power in both hands that could box a little. He always had trouble with superior boxers and DLH outlined the plan for how to beat him then Hopkins and Wright executed it.Originally posted by Rosewood_htownYes better than SRL...Tito didnt lose a fight until he stepped up to MW..He literally destroyed every single fight put in front of his, while only fight the best...SRL was nice as hell but Tito has him...He is not over nothing...just check his track record..it speaks without words being spoken..Comment
-
Not failing at anything, you're the one who publicly said you wanted to see facts and that I showed everyone. One last thing, make sure you don't run again into that big ****ed Argentinian guy who gave you the sore ass, makes you a little cranky!!! LOLOriginally posted by Dr_CynicalOh right, you spend your time digging through my posts and make a post about it yet it's not directed towards me?
Whatever kid.
Why do you keep on with this bull****?
You're making no sense and whatever it is you've set out to accomplish, you haven't.
You're failing, as usual.Comment
-
Nope...he lost to B Hop & Winky...He beat DLH...and we are talking about WW...2 loses came at MW....now let me guess, you are a DLH bopper and you think he beat Tito....Originally posted by Dr_CynicalSee? Here we go with that bull**** about him destroying everyone he's faced.
I suppose in your mind he destroyed Oscar, Hopkins, and Wright, correct?
Comment
-
Vargas was knocked out....DLH was beaten......low blow this low blow that....outlined this outlined that....save that crap...to add, both B hop and winky would be murdered in a rematch..Originally posted by amagninLook Tito was a good fighter, but come on better than SRL...not a chance. And he struggled against DLH even if you think he won (which I don't think he did). Also what other tough fights did he take below MW? He didn't look so invincible against Vargas... in fact if he doesn't use a low blow he probably would have been KO'd. Take Tito for what he is/was... a good WW with power in both hands that could box a little. He always had trouble with superior boxers and DLH outlined the plan for how to beat him then Hopkins and Wright executed it.Comment
-
He also took on Campas who was 55-0 or 56-0 at the time, Oba Carr who was really dangerous at the time and undefeated, Pernell Whitaker who was still formidable albeit not prime, Camacho was still dangerous and only had 1 or 2 losses on his record when Tito beat him. The only real WW contender that Tito didn't fight was Ike and that was because Ike fell of the map after his controversial loss to DLH.Originally posted by amagninLook Tito was a good fighter, but come on better than SRL...not a chance. And he struggled against DLH even if you think he won (which I don't think he did). Also what other tough fights did he take below MW? He didn't look so invincible against Vargas... in fact if he doesn't use a low blow he probably would have been KO'd. Take Tito for what he is/was... a good WW with power in both hands that could box a little. He always had trouble with superior boxers and DLH outlined the plan for how to beat him then Hopkins and Wright executed it.
I think a better question would be to ask Who Tito didn't fight when he was a WW. Tito was a great WW, greater than SRL...hmmm, I'm dont know about but some what debatable, however his is great non the less. His only losses come at MiddleWeight which is 2 divisions up, even DLH who is almost univerally considered great got demolished when he moved up too high.Comment
-
Hey Cynical why do you even bother trying to post on a Trinidad thread if you dislike him so much. Must be the DLH loss? You can't deny that win or lose Trinidad's fights where always exciting (excluding the Winky Wright boxing lesson). If anyone is hanging on Trinidad's nuts is you cuz you wait for a thread to open so you can argue with everyone that's posting. Did your ex leave you for Trinidad? Did he hurt your feelings? Tell me what happened between you and him that has you all angered and emotionally destroyed. We are your friends and we are here to help.Comment
Comment