Better resume Mike Tyson or Wladimir Klitschko?

[LacedUp]

wlads prime losses are the same as career enders?

you can say it - if you said, it you'd be a liar.

again, lacedup.

Do you think Wlad was in his prime then?

Alright

[LacedUp]

a round what?

a round fat liar, trying to reverse facts. Again! Poor show.

lolzwut

I was 'around' do you understand the word?

Newbie.

[DreamFighter]

lolzwut

I was 'around' do you understand the word?

Newbie.

the only round you got is the first when I koed you.

[DreamFighter]

Do you think Wlad was in his prime then?

Alright

yuh prime isnt 25-33 only when the name is klitschko explaining those horrible prime losses.
u destory yourself, nice

[UNBANNED]

Tyson was undisputed, Wladimir wasn't. Mike had mandatories too . He had all 3 belts( wbo belt was non existant til around the time Mike beat Spinks, and up until 2002ish the other major sanctioning bodies would make you drop the wbo belt if you wanted to fight for their strap....they didn't recognize the wbo at all). Honestly both their resumes are so so from an ATG standpoint. It depends what ur criteria consists of when ranking the two. Mike had 2 hof scalps in Spinks and Holmes ( one being a past prime ATG ) both being former lineal Champs , wlad beat 0 hof entrants , and 0 ATG . He beat one former lineal champion in hasim rahman .

I'd say Mike Tyson had the better resume . If you wanna break it down further into belt holders tyson beat 8 , Wladimir beat 7( wlad should be 5 tho as I counted the wba regular belt for haye and povetkin [there was only one wba belt when tyson was active, and I'm not counting interim titles either ]) . Really all wlad has going for him is his 20 title defenses or whatever the number is . Its def Mike hands down . And iam not a big tyson fan . There is no bias here , just facts

Great points. Despite a SHORTER run Tyson BEAT more CHAMPS and HOF/ATG opponents.

Doesn't go much further than that tbh

[kiDynamite92]

Got himself into a position

Hilarious rewriting of history.

I don't know about you but something about:

1. Going undefeated for 5 years, only having lost to Evander Holyfield (former unidisputed and lineal heavyweight champion) in more then a decade.
2. Being a former undisputed and lineal heavyweight champion himself.
3. Being seen as one of the few legitimate threats to Lennox (7-4 odds)
4. Being the fight the world wanted to see - turned out to be only the most luceratuve fight in heavyweight history.
5. Lewis publically stating he couldn't retire without fighting Tyson.

Kinda does tell you he got himself into a position to fight Lewis right?

[Truth Bringer]

Tyson ****s on Wlad. Wlad's best win is David Gaye lmao and he fought like a b1tch in that fight.

[kiDynamite92]

yuh prime isnt 25-33 only when the name is klitschko explaining those horrible prime losses.
u destory yourself, nice

He's a total moron, he'll bring up Mike losing to Douglas but closes his eyes, ears and starts yelling when you mention Purity, Sanders and Brewster.

[DreamFighter]

He's a total moron, he'll bring up Mike losing to Douglas but closes his eyes, ears and starts yelling when you mention Purity, Sanders and Brewster.

yuh it is amusing seeing him nuke his own arguments, well said.

[Marchegiano]

Wait wait wait. This is complete bollocks.

Lewis had signed to fight the guy the fans wanted him to see: Michael Grant AND had approval from the WBA.

The snake Don King sued WBA, saying Ruiz needed a shot. Meanwhile, David Tua had a mandatory shot with the IBF.

WBA agreed to sanction the Grant fight with the caveat that the winner fights Ruiz within 6 months or something like that. David Tua was trying to get Lewis stripped in the meantime.

Lewis ended up fighting the #1 guy, not the boring man (to the fans, TV networks and everyone's pleasure).

To think that can come back and haunt him from a guy on the internet 20 years later is hilarious and embarrassing (for you).

Court case prick face