Wilder's resume unpacked

[daggum]

I already saw that as i have the article saved. Now see my response above.

How does having Stevens at #10 make sense? Going off the annual rankings, Stevens was unranked when he fought G

Take the L man. i told you. why do you keep digging? he was ranked. you dont have to like it or agree with it but he was.

[Chollo Vista]

Stevens was rated #9 at middleweight in the issue just prior to his fight with Golovkin. January 2014 cover date, ratings current to 10/20/2013.

I've searched and can't find that source.

But let's say that theory is true. Are we going off annual rankings or are we going off monthly rankings?

The article you posted is based off annual rankings, no?

[Chollo Vista]

Take the L man. i told you. why do you keep digging? he was ranked. you dont have to like it or agree with it but he was.

All I did was ask for a source man.

Based off your own source he was unranked

[crold1]

I've searched and can't find that source.

But let's say that theory is true. Are we going off annual rankings or are we going off monthly rankings?

The article you posted is based off annual rankings, no?

No. The article included EVERY issue of ratings in the magazine for the decade. It's based on where fighters were rated in the single issue (or most recent archived TBRB list) before the fight. I just pulled the issue again to check.

[Chollo Vista]

No. The article included EVERY issue of ratings in the magazine for the decade. It's based on where fighters were rated in the single issue (or most recent archived TBRB list) before the fight. I just pulled the issue again to check.

So if Stevens was #9 like you said, why is he ranked #10 in the article?

Also can you link me to that source?

EDIT: My bad, daggums source had him at 10, not yours. Can you link me to that source for my own edification?

[daggum]

All I did was ask for a source man.

Based off your own source he was unranked

i just posted another source which you ignored lol

undefeated WBA titleholder Gennady Golovkin broke down No. 9-rated Curtis Stevens to an eighth-round stoppage with Stevens’ corner halting the bout at the end of the round. “GGG” cannot improve his No. 1 rating. Stevens will drop from No. 9 to No. 10

you must be a masochist

[daggum]

So if Stevens was #9 like you said, why is he ranked #10 in the article?

Also can you link me to that source?

why do you ask for links and sources? you refuse to use them lol. he was 9 when they fought as i posted with the source. and dropped to 10. thats not hard to understand. what is easy to understand is that you refuse to admit you are wrong.

[crold1]

So if Stevens was #9 like you said, why is he ranked #10 in the article?

Also can you link me to that source?

EDIT: My bad, daggums source had him at 10, not yours. Can you link me to that source for my own edification?

Can't post a photo; it's the January 2014 cover dated issue (the ratings in that issue are through 10/20/2013).https://www.******.com/past-issues/?...ownload=495059

Have to agree with Daggum on this one. Relative to their available top tens, and the variety faced, there is really no comparison between GGG and Wilder. Even Joshua is 7-1 against the same top tens in half as much career.

[daggum]

chollo "where's your source"

daggum "oh here it is"

chollo "you expect me to read that?"

[Chollo Vista]

i just posted another source which you ignored lol

undefeated WBA titleholder Gennady Golovkin broke down No. 9-rated Curtis Stevens to an eighth-round stoppage with Stevens’ corner halting the bout at the end of the round. “GGG” cannot improve his No. 1 rating. Stevens will drop from No. 9 to No. 10

you must be a masochist

Cool, like I said from the beginning, I just wanted to see the source you were talking about because the photo you posted conflicted with the article. It just didn't make sense how he could be unranked at the end of 2012, take a loss and move up into top 10. It didn't add up and I won't just take your word for it lol

Cool, problem solved. You da man lol