Should fighters take the blame for decisions their promoters make?
Collapse
-
-
I couldn't care less what you think about your "King". Fact is he went with lesser threat (Breazeale and Ortiz) when he was offered 100M to fight big threats.
Trying to use Fury's name to debunk this and leaving out Breazeale and Ortiz who he announced (Pre-Joshua getting KTFO) and fighting immediately shows you are here to defend your "king" from the ducking that me and Aboutfkntime agreed upon in regards to Wilder.Comment
-
Comment
-
don't get it bent
AJ did not offer Wilder $100m... DAZN did
and Wilder refused that offer because of... " dishonesty "
he was quite clear on that
AJ only offered Wilder $15m dude, that was his best offer
and he shat himself when Wilder accepted
$15m LMAO
how fkn dumb would you need to be to let Wilder get away when you had him on the hook for $15m... ?
dem boys were scurred, just like Lennox Lewis saidComment
-
Comment
-
Should fighters take the blame for decisions their promoters make?
it looks like the main question has been answered
bltches be making excuses for their timid hoes
" I fight who my promoters says doe " ... LMAO
Broner has bigger balls than Golovkin and AJ put together
#bltchesbeingbltchesComment
-
I could care less what you and Aboutfkntime agree upon.I couldn't care less what you think about your "King". Fact is he went with lesser threat (Breazeale and Ortiz) when he was offered 100M to fight big threats.
Trying to use Fury's name to debunk this and leaving out Breazeale and Ortiz who he announced (Pre-Joshua getting KTFO) and fighting immediately shows you are here to defend your "king" from the ducking that me and Aboutfkntime agreed upon in regards to Wilder.
Fury isn't a lesser threat and any normal boxing observer knows it.
Wilder will have fought him 3 times by the end of the year most
likely yet you'll still be going on about how he has a lesser resume.Comment
-
Go on then, who is working for who? You quite sure you even understand the terminology here? A managers job is working for the fighter, but the promoters responsibility is to make money for his promotion, he can only be seen as 'working for the fighter' inasmuch as their interests co-incide. Perhaps the closest analogy is describing the fighter as a contractor and the promoter as the client, although it's slightly more nuanced and there's a number of different ways in can work, especially for PPVs or when you get fighters effectively becoming their own one man promotions which is the way they tend to go (mainly for tax reasons I think) when they start getting decent purses or PPV income. The issue is confused further with the blurred roles between promoters and distributors and by fighters having contracts with - sometimes - both distruibutor and promoter, but in all cases the fighter is getting paid by one of them, and so, by definition, is kinda working 'for' them.
That FWIW is the key import of the Ali act by the way, the delination of legal responsibility... the drawing of a firewall between manager and promoter.
You might find some of this **** useful or at least a person who didn't think they already knew everything might find it useful...
https://www.quora.com/How-does-the-b...s-get-paid-etc
To be fair though I've noticed in the past you don't seem to have a very good grasp on this kinda **** do ya? Purses and budgets and whatnot? Y'Know, how this stuff actually works in the real world... like thinking SKY were gonna pay for GGG to fight who he wanted on HBO.
Probably comes from only bandwagoning the very few fighters in the world who can actually afford to pretty much click their fingers and get who the hell they want in the ring.
Last edited by Citizen Koba; 04-29-2020, 09:59 AM.Comment
-
This is all fan girl talk... “He refuse 100m because of dishonesty”
... Fact that we have both established was he ducked 100m because he had to fight tougher opponents. We have both established that.. no need to bring anyone else into it. So yes you are right “Only blame the fighter” we shouldn’t blame the promoter in this instance.
Last edited by Ray*; 04-29-2020, 11:04 AM.Comment
-
You obviously cared enough to jump in to the conversation to defend your “King”. If you couldn’t care less then you would have stayed out of mine and Anoutfkntime’s agreement than Wilder turned down 100m to fight lesser threats. 100m meant fighting tougher opponents, your “King” didn’t want to do that, he went the other way. So glad he got his destroyed for cherrypicking and ducking, 5 years as a champ and NOT one single unification in that time. So anyone defending this ducker should be ashamed.Comment

Comment