Fine by me
Do I really need to list all the ATG's that have all been underdog's at a point or another in their respective careers?
Come on man. Let's not go down that road. Just accept the data for what it is.
If a thread like this makes a fighter that you like look bad, get mad at that fighter and challenge them to take more risks, don't spend time to try and undermine the data. Even though Pac took losses, a thread like this speaks to his level of greatness; same as Canelo considering his age. Not to say odds are the only thing that make a fighter great as there are other considerations, but it does help paint a picture.
Doesn't change the fact that exceptional fighters are less likely to be underdogs since they're less likely to face opponents who are a risk to them. You made the assumption that odds without context could be used as a way to judge a fighter's legacy
Come on man. Let's not go down that road. Just accept the data for what it is.
If a thread like this makes a fighter that you like look bad, get mad at that fighter and challenge them to take more risks, don't spend time to try and undermine the data. Even though Pac took losses, a thread like this speaks to his level of greatness; same as Canelo considering his age. Not to say odds are the only thing that make a fighter great as there are other considerations, but it does help paint a picture.
Comment