Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

As it stands who had a better career Fury or Bowe

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by Nay_Sayer View Post
    Why?

    Ross Purrity
    Corrie Sanders
    Lamon Brewster

    Are three good reasons why the Real Deal is better than Dr. Glass Jaw..
    Holyfield got knocked out by a fat middle weight, lost to ruiz, dropped by Joe Frazier's nephew and lost to michael moorer.

    Everyone can play that game.

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by LacedUp View Post
      Holyfield got knocked out by a fat middle weight, lost to ruiz, dropped by Joe Frazier's nephew and lost to michael moorer.

      Everyone can play that game.
      Holyfield was not the 1988-1992 prime version.....he lost to those guys pushing 40 bro

      Moorer was a good fighter.....but lets be real....neither bowe and holyfield were the same reflex punch resistance out punch out put wise after their classic first fight...no fighter is the same after a war like that

      Comment


      • #63
        Big daddy bowe

        Comment


        • #64
          Fury by a margin. If you take away the Holyfield fights, who did Bowe beat? Not to mention the fact that Holyfield had heart problems in one fight and hepatitis in another. Bowe threw the WBC title in the bin rather than fight Lewis and Golota was battering him before low blows. I think Bowe is overrated if anything.

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by LacedUp View Post
            Do I think Wladimir Klitschko could beat that Tyson? Yes I do. I don't see why that's unreasonable at all.

            I also think Klitschko would be able to lose to Lewis on points quite widely.

            not sure he'd get the draw though.

            Holyfield is a greater heavyweight. I've argued many times that he has one of the best resumes in history.

            Beating undefeated klitschko for 10 years is a better achievement to beating holyfield the first time imo. Klitschko was a more proven champion and longer reigning.

            Holyfield just had a greater career overall.
            i don't. Even though he was faded he would have definitely been way too much for Wladamir. Fact is Klitschko's reign was during one of the worst periods in heavyweight history. Lennox was the great of the previous era, on his worst night when he was an old man, he was still able to smash Vitali's face to a stoppage.

            This is Vitali, the superior Klitschko. Wladamir was a bit of a joke to be honest, the only reason he was able to reign for so long was because his big brother let him, Vitali could have, at almost anytime have taken those belts.

            Oh and no chance Wladamir makes it out against Lewis. Would be a brutal stoppage.

            Comment


            • #66
              Bowe! What the Hell kind of question is that?

              Comment


              • #67
                Fury has a win over a “fraud” and a 40 year old that he had to dope up to beat...........but he’s now being pushed as an atg just like loma.


                But bu it ain’t about race.

                Comment


                • #68
                  Obviously Fury. Fury ended Klitschko`s 9 years long reign and Wilder`s 5 years long reign.

                  Klitschko in 11 years barely lost a round before Fury beat him.
                  Last edited by JakeTheBoxer; 04-23-2020, 05:34 AM.

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by therealpugilist View Post
                    Holyfield was not the 1988-1992 prime version.....he lost to those guys pushing 40 bro

                    Moorer was a good fighter.....but lets be real....neither bowe and holyfield were the same reflex punch resistance out punch out put wise after their classic first fight...no fighter is the same after a war like that
                    Man, Klitschko lost hist titles against Fury when he was 39. Which means, Klitschko was unbeaten when he was 28 -39.
                    Last edited by JakeTheBoxer; 04-23-2020, 05:38 AM.

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by kiDynamite92 View Post
                      i don't. Even though he was faded he would have definitely been way too much for Wladamir. Fact is Klitschko's reign was during one of the worst periods in heavyweight history. Lennox was the great of the previous era, on his worst night when he was an old man, he was still able to smash Vitali's face to a stoppage.

                      This is Vitali, the superior Klitschko. Wladamir was a bit of a joke to be honest, the only reason he was able to reign for so long was because his big brother let him, Vitali could have, at almost anytime have taken those belts.

                      Oh and no chance Wladamir makes it out against Lewis. Would be a brutal stoppage.
                      I do agree Klitschko would be knocked out by Lewis on most nights. but I was around when lewis was around, and he looked like crap against fighters who were far inferior to both klitschkos on more than one occasion.

                      I believe Klitschko could definitely beat Tyson. Tyson had big problems with tall guys with jabs and he was past his prime.

                      Tyson's era in the 80s was just as bad as Klitschko's, if not not worse.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP