As it stands who had a better career Fury or Bowe

[LacedUp]

bowe lost one time and has an all time great on his resume and an all time classic trilogy and is a hall of famer.....fury has a lot to do before he can be considered a hall of famer


cant agree and thinking fury had a better career is not reasonable defies logic

didn't he get smashed by golota twice? haha

[Removed Now]

being undisputed is something that Bowe accomplished as well he doesnt have near the opponents on his ledger to pass Bowe yet...Bowe also beat former titlists in Tony Tucker, Tony Tubbs, Bruce Seldon, Pinklon Thomas, Michael Dokes, Herbie Hide and decent fighters like larry donald and terrell biggs
Fury has beaten a total of 3 ranked opponents his entire career.

he would have to do more than beat Joshua.

Fury would be better since he would be undisputed with all four belts.

[therealpugilist]

didn't he get smashed by golota twice? haha

he got his nuts crushed 2 fights str8 and got 2 dq wins....fights were action packed but foul-fested.....Golota could have won if his head was on str8 and stopped intentionally fouling

[therealpugilist]

Fury would be better since he would be undisputed with all four belts.

the WBO meant very little in the 90s and was not recognized as a major title in that era.....also Fury did not face the competition or beat the level Bowe did....beating wilder, an old klitschko doesnt match Bowe's body of work....you may just prefer Fury but he for sure wasnt as accomplished or fought the comp bowe has

[kiDynamite92]

Why is Holyfield far better than Klitschko? at least comparable. It's not like Holyfield didn't get dropped by small people and lost to michael moorer etc.

Did you forget he also beat a Holyfield with severe heart conditions?

Very least comparable. both were great fighters.

And then he went on to beat a faded but still dangerous Mike Tyson and draw with Lennox Lewis. So you really think Klitschko could do either? His big brother, the superior Klitschko was stopped by Lennox in his worst condition.

[Nay_Sayer]

It takes a special fighter to beat Tyson Fury and Rid**** Bowe isn’t one of them.

How many undefeated ATGs has Fury beaten?

[Nay_Sayer]

Why is Holyfield far better than Klitschko?

Why?

Ross Purrity
Corrie Sanders
Lamon Brewster

Are three good reasons why the Real Deal is better than Dr. Glass Jaw..

[Da Pimper]

They both suck

[REDEEMER]

Bowe is known for Holyfield wins and a defeat ,he’s also ducked Lewis so how can you put him over a guy who’s held all the belts before ? I’d add those Golota fights really detracted from his career ,Fury has better wins all around it’s not close .

Bowe is really one of those niches in boxing ,where we know what Fury can do ,both share a level of inconsistency but Fury is undefeated against two champions and only one he’s never faced ,Bowe left a lot of what ifs in retirement ,to much to put him over Fury .

[LacedUp]

And then he went on to beat a faded but still dangerous Mike Tyson and draw with Lennox Lewis. So you really think Klitschko could do either? His big brother, the superior Klitschko was stopped by Lennox in his worst condition.

Do I think Wladimir Klitschko could beat that Tyson? Yes I do. I don't see why that's unreasonable at all.

I also think Klitschko would be able to lose to Lewis on points quite widely.

not sure he'd get the draw though.

Holyfield is a greater heavyweight. I've argued many times that he has one of the best resumes in history.

Beating undefeated klitschko for 10 years is a better achievement to beating holyfield the first time imo. Klitschko was a more proven champion and longer reigning.

Holyfield just had a greater career overall.