-
-
IDK??? Vanes and Rolls are 10x better than Cotto and Mayweather. And this Simon Sesame Street dude is a future HOFamer!!! He beat Fury and Wilder back in the day. Even Ali wouldn’t fight himyou lost your ability to " mix it up " with anyone... when you DESTROYED the official scoring criteria, to justify why you think that Golovkin beat Canelo
and btw, the story you told a few days ago to explain the criteria for greatness, is the ******est thing I have ever heard
you think the criteria for greatness is how you fare against good/average opponents... and how you fare against greats has no bearing, because fighters often lose to other great fighters LMAOOOO
where do you get that lame corny shlt ?
nobody is dumber than you fanboy
I added that to your list.....
thinks that Golovkin has a better resume than Canelo.....
----------------------------
thinks that one of the " killers " on Golovkin's resume could have beaten Canelo.... but will not say which one
----------------------------
thinks that Golovkin has faced more quality opposition than almost any other fighter in history.....
----------------------------
thinks that Andre Ward is no better than Bika Barrera and Miranda
----------------------------
thinks that Golovkin has 5-6 'great' wins..... but cannot even name 1 of those 'great' wins
----------------------------
thinks that Lemieux, Murray... are the same level as Canelo/Jacobs
----------------------------
thinks that Murray Lemieux Monroe and Vanes, are better wins for Golovkin..... than Lara Cotto Trout and Mosley, are for Canelo.....
----------------------------
creates a thread misquoting Steve Weisfeld.....
-------------------------------
proves that he has no idea how to score a professional boxing match...
-------------------------------
thinks Golovkin's resume is just as good as Pernell Whitaker's resume
-------------------------------
thinks that Daniel Geale is a better fighter than Jeff Fenech
-------------------------------
has NO idea what qualifies a fighter for greatnessComment
-
Actually, seeing Kovalev losing by ko, I have even more respect for GGG. He is so strong and tough. I can't even imagine him losing by a ko.
Yes, Szeremeta is a questionable opponent, but it doesn't mean an easy fight for Golovkin. Even a big underdog can be a great challenge for a champion.Comment
-
I stand by anything I've said on here...and as usual, you embellish/twist around many things I've said...you can tell that you are rather desperate when you have to do that...there are some comments or comparisons I've made, where some may disagree at first...but I don't make any comments/comparisons really without putting some effort into it...I'll analyze a situation and give my opinion and go from there...if someone make a good case counter to mine, I reserve the right to change my opinion.you lost your ability to " mix it up " with anyone... when you DESTROYED the official scoring criteria, to justify why you think that Golovkin beat Canelo
and btw, the story you told a few days ago to explain the criteria for greatness, is the ******est thing I have ever heard
you think the criteria for greatness is how you fare against good/average opponents... and how you fare against greats has no bearing, because fighters often lose to other great fighters LMAOOOO
where do you get that lame corny shlt ?
nobody is dumber than you fanboy
I added that to your list.....
thinks that Golovkin has a better resume than Canelo.....
----------------------------
thinks that one of the " killers " on Golovkin's resume could have beaten Canelo.... but will not say which one
----------------------------
thinks that Golovkin has faced more quality opposition than almost any other fighter in history.....
----------------------------
thinks that Andre Ward is no better than Bika Barrera and Miranda
----------------------------
thinks that Golovkin has 5-6 'great' wins..... but cannot even name 1 of those 'great' wins
----------------------------
thinks that Lemieux, Murray... are the same level as Canelo/Jacobs
----------------------------
thinks that Murray Lemieux Monroe and Vanes, are better wins for Golovkin..... than Lara Cotto Trout and Mosley, are for Canelo.....
----------------------------
creates a thread misquoting Steve Weisfeld.....
-------------------------------
proves that he has no idea how to score a professional boxing match...
-------------------------------
thinks Golovkin's resume is just as good as Pernell Whitaker's resume
-------------------------------
thinks that Daniel Geale is a better fighter than Jeff Fenech
-------------------------------
has NO idea what qualifies a fighter for greatness
As far as some stuff which you quoted from me, which you didn't really embellish, such as Bika or Barrera being about as good as Ward...yeah I think if they were all from the same country and fought on even terms, they would all have about the same record and be considered about as good as one another.
Bika has 7 losses and 1 draw in his career...all of them on the road (to good fighters), 6 by decision, and one by DQ...and the one draw...if he was fighting in his backyard for all of those, and was allowed to get a little dirty in those fights if needed...how many people can honestly say that he would still have 7 losses and a draw there?
I think with simply just a change of venue, his record would look considerably different...Ward fought all of his fights at home, and benefited from all of those types of decisions, the type that Bika never got a favor in...similar story with Barrera in a way.
And yes...anyone who watched the fights with Ward vs Bika and Barrera...and knows boxing...and is rather neutral...if you say Ward dominated those 2 fights, I just can't really take you seriously at all...that would be similar to saying GGG dominated Derevy...it's silly.Comment
-
He's fighting his mandatory. Should he dump his title like Canelo did at 160 and 175?Comment
Tweet
Comment