How can GGG fans keep defending this clown?

[Death_Adder]

I SAW that and almost fell out of my chair!!! What a DUMB ***!

He's so ****** he's making up names for 97k career.

"Remember that time GGG fought Muhammad Ali in MSG and KO'd him, then fought Mike Tyson a week later in Las Vegas and also KO'd him?"

"Yeah, GGG is the greatest."


That's how delusional these Gargling Golovkin Gonad imbeciles are.

[aboutfkntime]

how can GGG fans keep defending this clown?

you mean, like this... ?

I would even say Geale in his prime was a better fighter than Jeff Fenech

[IMG]https://media3.*****.com/media/gh1PcN7Agxlcc/*****.gif[/IMG]

[Boxing_1013]

kid... they are DIRECT QUOTES... WITH LINKS !!

if you think Bika is on the same level as Ward, then you are a shlthead

a typically ignorant casual-fan shlthead LMAO

dude, you said all that dumb shlt

go and wipe the egg off your face

you proved that you have no idea about levels

which is why you said Golovkin has a better resume than Canelo... which is why you said Golovkin has faced more quality opposition than almost any other fighter in history... which is why you said Ward is no better than Bika Barrera and Miranda... which is why you said that Lemieux is the same level as Canelo/Jacobs loooool..... which is why you said Golovkin's resume is as good as Pernell Whitakers... and which is why you said that Geale was a better fighter than Jeff Fenech

dude, one of your latest gems... that Geale is better than Fenech... WTF?

WTF is wrong with you kid... ???

delete that silly alt account, there is no coming back from saying ******ity like that... you obviously have no idea who Fenech is, you had never heard of him... you 5-minute fanboy fool

Why do you get so emotional on here though...just because someone has a different opinion than you...it's bizarre man.

"thinks that one of the " killers " on Golovkin's resume could have beaten Canelo.... but will not say which one

thinks that Golovkin has faced more quality opposition than almost any other fighter in history.....

thinks that Golovkin has 5-6 'great' wins..... but cannot even name 1 of those 'great' wins"

On the 3 above things, for example...I have explained that in number 1) if Canelo faced GGG's roster of guys, subbing in for GGG when GGG faced them, I think he would have probably lost one of the fights...similar to how I would favor Wilder vs anyone at HW besides Fury...but out of 10 fights, he would probably lose 1 or 2 of those...it's statistics man, if you don't understand that, I can't help you there my friend.

2) I said GGG has about 20 fights now vs quality, solid pros...I've studied boxing history quite a bit...most guys do not have that many fights vs a real boxer...if you want to say that guys like Rosado and Macklin don't count...well I don't think you are really keeping it real...and then you would have to discount the resumes of a lot of other fighters as well.

3) I named who I felt were his best wins, officially and unofficially...and said they were all 'great' wins, factoring in opponent level and manner of victory...if you need me to break that down for you anymore, idk what to tell ya man.

Also, you attempt to twist my words, or you just fail to understand, the point I made about Weisfeld and how to score fights...all of the criteria is important, but as Weisfeld said (and as is rather obvious) you don't actively score anything other than the punches that land and their effectiveness...that is rather obvious really.

That you don't understand that, or attempt to twist it around, just takes away any credibility you may have...similar to how you appear to fail to understand that putting out the Weisfeld article as a guide for how judges score fights, does not mean that there isn't corruption in boxing, and that even good reputable judges can't get caught up in that and turn in rigged cards.

We all know that happens...to argue against it is silly really...also, again, you don't even score fights bro...like how can you have any comment about judging fights or what scores are in fights...to have a real opinion on a fight, you have to sit down and score it bro.

In any event I do hope you in the future try and actually score fights before giving feedback on them...I think you may change your opinion on some things here, and maybe get a bit more respect...peace

[aboutfkntime]

Why do you get so emotional on here though...just because someone has a different opinion than you...it's bizarre man.

"thinks that one of the " killers " on Golovkin's resume could have beaten Canelo.... but will not say which one

thinks that Golovkin has faced more quality opposition than almost any other fighter in history.....

thinks that Golovkin has 5-6 'great' wins..... but cannot even name 1 of those 'great' wins"

On the 3 above things, for example...I have explained that in number 1) if Canelo faced GGG's roster of guys, subbing in for GGG when GGG faced them, I think he would have probably lost one of the fights...similar to how I would favor Wilder vs anyone at HW besides Fury...but out of 10 fights, he would probably lose 1 or 2 of those...it's statistics man, if you don't understand that, I can't help you there my friend.

2) I said GGG has about 20 fights now vs quality, solid pros...I've studied boxing history quite a bit...most guys do not have that many fights vs a real boxer...if you want to say that guys like Rosado and Macklin don't count...well I don't think you are really keeping it real...and then you would have to discount the resumes of a lot of other fighters as well.

3) I named who I felt were his best wins, officially and unofficially...and said they were all 'great' wins, factoring in opponent level and manner of victory...if you need me to break that down for you anymore, idk what to tell ya man.

Also, you attempt to twist my words, or you just fail to understand, the point I made about Weisfeld and how to score fights...all of the criteria is important, but as Weisfeld said (and as is rather obvious) you don't actively score anything other than the punches that land and their effectiveness...that is rather obvious really.

That you don't understand that, or attempt to twist it around, just takes away any credibility you may have...similar to how you appear to fail to understand that putting out the Weisfeld article as a guide for how judges score fights, does not mean that there isn't corruption in boxing, and that even good reputable judges can't get caught up in that and turn in rigged cards.

We all know that happens...to argue against it is silly really...also, again, you don't even score fights bro...like how can you have any comment about judging fights or what scores are in fights...to have a real opinion on a fight, you have to sit down and score it bro.

In any event I do hope you in the future try and actually score fights before giving feedback on them...I think you may change your opinion on some things here, and maybe get a bit more respect...peace

nobody got emotional... I simply corrected your lies

you dishonestly stated that I misrepresented your quotes

but I quoted you DIRECTLY... WITH LINKS !!

you said all that dumb shlt son... go wipe the egg off your face

these are my favorites...

Lemieux... pretty clearly around the level of... Canelo/Jacobs

I would even say Geale in his prime was a better fighter than Fenech

but yea, comparing Golovkin to greats like Whitaker was also epic ******ity

[Boxing_1013]

you mean, like this... ?




[IMG]https://media3.*****.com/media/gh1PcN7Agxlcc/*****.gif[/IMG]

Fenech was 29-3...and a world champion...in 3 classes? But at very small weights where almost everyone is a multi-weight world champion...worse competition and the weight increases are small.

What's his best win...a 36 YO Zarate, at home?

Geale was 31-5 and a MW world champion...a top 3 division historically.

How can people really try and make them out to be drastically different.

Most people won't even know who Fenech is man...the stuff you try and make out to be some incredible issue is just odd dude.

[Boxing_1013]

nobody got emotional... I simply corrected your lies

you dishonestly stated that I misrepresented your quotes

but I quoted you DIRECTLY... WITH LINKS !!

you said all that dumb shlt son... go wipe the egg off your face

these are my favorites...





but yea, comparing Golovkin to greats like Whitaker was also epic ******ity

Geale is 4th on this guy's list of top ever Aussies...Fenech first...pretty equal to me:

https://www.theroar.com.au/2018/03/0...s-of-all-time/

[DreamFighter]

Fenech was 29-3...and a world champion...in 3 classes? But at very small weights where almost everyone is a multi-weight world champion...worse competition and the weight increases are small.

What's his best win...a 36 YO Zarate, at home?

Geale was 31-5 and a MW world champion...a top 3 division historically.

How can people really try and make them out to be drastically different.

Most people won't even know who Fenech is man...the stuff you try and make out to be some incredible issue is just odd dude.

Geale in his pomp was a solid 2 time champ, never elite, but he took on GGG as a retirement fight.

but its arguable that retirement Geale is GGG's 2nd best win,sure.

[stealthradon]

This imbecile just claimed 97k fought Cotto.

He's below braindead.

He technically did.
By Cotto literally paying GGG to not fight him, he has the victory.
Cotto would not fight GGG. He paid him, so he wouldn't have to fight him.
That's a victory for GGG.

[stealthradon]

I SAW that and almost fell out of my chair!!! What a DUMB ***!

Remember the time Cotto lost to GGG?
I do, because he paid him not to fight him.
That's a loss, idiot.
That's admitting defeat.
He lost so bad, he didn't even fight him.
What a coward.

[stealthradon]

He's so ****** he's making up names for 97k career.

"Remember that time GGG fought Muhammad Ali in MSG and KO'd him, then fought Mike Tyson a week later in Las Vegas and also KO'd him?"

"Yeah, GGG is the greatest."


That's how delusional these Gargling Golovkin Gonad imbeciles are.

Did Cotto pay GGG not to fight him, thereby giving him the victory?
Yes or no?
Stop rooting for a cheater.