Is Jose Luis Castillo an atg?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Madison Boxing
    Banned
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jul 2015
    • 35364
    • 6,455
    • 3,367
    • 190,590

    #11
    Originally posted by IronDanHamza
    You justified that by saying "one of the judges had Eubank winning" yet all 3 had Floyd winning Are you purposely missing that gigantic double standard or do you genuinely not see it?

    People were not unsure who won. That is again a LIE. The vast majority had Saunders winning. That is a FACT.

    In fact, an example of a fight where people were unsure who won is Mayweather-Castillo 1, where the press row media were split 50-50 on who won.

    Barely anyone, if anyone thought Eubank beat Saunders.

    These are facts.
    No Dan that wasn't my sole reason for saying it was 50 50, my eyes showed me that was a close fight and I know people who thought Eubank won. You never watched the damn fight

    Comment

    • IronDanHamza
      BoxingScene Icon
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Oct 2009
      • 49449
      • 5,022
      • 269
      • 104,043

      #12
      Originally posted by Madison boxing
      No Dan that wasn't my sole reason for saying it was 50 50, my eyes showed me that was a close fight and I know people who thought Eubank won. You never watched the damn fight
      You know people Oh really? Sure you do.

      The vast vast majority of any media, or any involvment in Boxing had saunders winning. F-A-C-T. I don't know which part of that you don't get.

      Mayweather-Castillo 1 was WAY closer than Eubank Saunders. Way closer. And the media press row supports that. Again, facts.

      To even claim I didn't watch or haven't seen the fight is just laughable and beyond pathetic. What are you, a child?

      Comment

      • Madison Boxing
        Banned
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Jul 2015
        • 35364
        • 6,455
        • 3,367
        • 190,590

        #13
        Originally posted by IronDanHamza
        You know people Oh really? Sure you do.

        The vast vast majority of any media, or any involvment in Boxing had saunders winning. F-A-C-T. I don't know which part of that you don't get.

        Mayweather-Castillo 1 was WAY closer than Eubank Saunders. Way closer. And the media press row supports that. Again, facts.

        To even claim I didn't watch or haven't seen the fight is just laughable and beyond pathetic. What are you, a child?
        Eubank won almost whole second half of fight, it was a split decision with widest card going in eubanks favour. Some fans had eubank winning based on his aggression, some didn't. You keep mentioning facts but only fact is that you didn't watch the fight.

        Comment

        • IronDanHamza
          BoxingScene Icon
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Oct 2009
          • 49449
          • 5,022
          • 269
          • 104,043

          #14
          Originally posted by Madison boxing
          Eubank won almost whole second half of fight, it was a split decision with widest card going in eubanks favour. Some fans had eubank winning based on his aggression, some didn't. You keep mentioning facts but only fact is that you didn't watch the fight.
          No like I said, barely any fans had Eubank winning. Barely anyone in general had Eubank winning.

          I don't dispute the fight was competitive after Eubank's late surge, but to say "many people thought Eubank won" is a flat out lie. It's that simple, that is the reality.

          It doesn't matter how many times you try and say it to fit your obvious agenda, it won't stop being a lie.

          Comment

          • Luilun
            Undisputed Champion
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Dec 2010
            • 12457
            • 555
            • 94
            • 58,436

            #15
            Originally posted by Madison boxing
            Judges aren't always right all I'm saying 'dan' is that Eubank Saunders was a close fight where people were unsure who won, mayweather castillo 1 was close too but had a clear winner.
            Judges know how to judge but at times they are paid off . Arum wanted Floyd to win If Castillo won all 12 rounds they still would have found away for Floyd to win

            Comment

            • HeadBodyBodyBody
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Dec 2013
              • 2183
              • 214
              • 424
              • 290,342

              #16
              Originally posted by Madison boxing
              No Dan that wasn't my sole reason for saying it was 50 50, my eyes showed me that was a close fight and I know people who thought Eubank won. You never watched the damn fight
              hahahahaha.... AHHHHH HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA..... good one

              Comment

              • Larry the boss
                EDUCATED
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Jan 2011
                • 90798
                • 6,419
                • 4,473
                • 2,500,480

                #17
                Originally posted by IronDanHamza
                You justified that by saying "one of the judges had Eubank winning" yet all 3 had Floyd winning Are you purposely missing that gigantic double standard or do you genuinely not see it?

                People were not unsure who won. That is again a LIE. The vast majority had Saunders winning. That is a FACT.

                In fact, an example of a fight where people were unsure who won is Mayweather-Castillo 1, where the press row media were split 50-50 on who won.

                Barely anyone, if anyone thought Eubank beat Saunders.

                These are facts.
                Damn this was brutal

                Comment

                • killakali
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Oct 2010
                  • 7197
                  • 226
                  • 171
                  • 87,195

                  #18
                  Originally posted by KillaMane26
                  If yall gon say he beat Floyd then i hope the same people say the same for fights like GGG vs Canelo
                  Or Whitaker beat Chávez or williams beat Lara

                  Comment

                  • GhostofDempsey
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Mar 2017
                    • 31517
                    • 13,068
                    • 8,654
                    • 493,602

                    #19
                    No he isn’t. Three solid wins to his credit, four if you count the Floyd robbery.

                    Comment

                    • HewJohnson
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Oct 2019
                      • 4354
                      • 404
                      • 2
                      • 125,484

                      #20
                      Lmao JLC is NOT an ATG.

                      Come on bro.

                      The only reason people really even still bring this guy up is because he really beat Floyd the first time around. That’s it and that’s pathetic.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP