But it’s probably because Lomachenko won three belts at 135 while Canelo beat up an old man to win a title that was given to the old man for beating Igor Mikhalkin.
But it’s probably because Lomachenko won three belts at 135 while Canelo beat up an old man to win a title that was given to the old man for beating Igor Mikhalkin.
But it’s probably because Lomachenko won three belts at 135 while Canelo beat up an old man to win a title that was given to the old man for beating Igor Mikhalkin.
when tf has rigo ever fought at 126? Do you think before you speak? Or do you just constantly say dumb sht for the fck of it?
Only to an imbecile like you, is beating the likes of Linares and Campbell more impressive than jumping up 2 divisions and beating a champ.
But it’s probably because Lomachenko won three belts at 135 while Canelo beat up an old man to win a title that was given to the old man for beating Igor Mikhalkin.
Kov got the belt by beating Alvarez in the rematch.
I didn’t realize you were taking about Lomachenko beating Rigondeaux. No one claims Lomachenko is number one p4p for beating Rigodeaux.
The reason Canelo’s light heavyweight run isn’t that impressive is because he moved up one division to fight Kovalev. 2 of his 5 fights prior to Kovalev happened at super middleweight. Also, he fought Kovalev. Kovalev won his title by beating Igor Mikhalkin. Kovalev was 4-3 in his 7 fights before the loss to Canelo. He’s now 4-4 in his past 8, with 3 knockout losses. He’s shot.
Originally posted by mcdonalds
when tf has rigo ever fought at 126? Do you think before you speak? Or do you just constantly say dumb sht for the fck of it?
Only to an imbecile like you, is beating the likes of Linares and Campbell more impressive than jumping up 2 divisions and beating a champ.
Comment