Gervonta ....Allegedly Struck Woman In Face

[The Big Dunn]

We have posters with such PBC nuthuggery that events caught on video didn't happen because it doesn't suit them. Speaking of proof this thread proves what a lot of people suspected about Big Dunn.

Lets make a ban bet. Show me where I posted in this thread or anywhere in the forum "it didn't happen".

I posted Tank is innocent until proven guilty which he clearly is.

[daggum]

No you are. He's using your logic.

omg he didn't even get it. i feel bad. picking on a blind guy

[The Big Dunn]

dunn must be our first blind poster on boxingscene. i didnt realize it until now. sorry dunn. there is a video of him showing him clearly being violent but i was insensitive and didnt realize you were blind. i will do better. i must do better.

Again, nothing you post changes the fact he is innocent until proven guilty. Once he is convicted then have at him. Until then I choose rule of law.

Try it sometime.

[famicommander]

LMFAO. Yes there is a difference between a court of law and the court of public opinion. I maintain he is innocent until proven guilty. I don't see how there is any argument otherwise.

From a legal perspective that's true.

From a basic deduction and use of your freaking eyes perspective? Come on.

Legally speaking, Michael Jackson was not guilty and Roman Polanski has never been brought to trial. But everybody knows they were kiddy-diddling sickos, regardless of whether you like their art.

[KillaMane26]

The first situation i didnt agree with and called him out on it. But i wasn't on the lynch team ready to stone him. But this right here....

Pass me a rock

[daggum]

now im not going to rush to judgement on these 2 lads! you might want to based on who they are, who they associate with, and what they look like but innocent until proven guilty! were they ever convicted in a court of law? THE ANSWER IS NO!

[daggum]

From a legal perspective that's true.

From a basic deduction and use of your freaking eyes perspective? Come on.

Legally speaking, Michael Jackson was not guilty and Roman Polanski has never been brought to trial. But everybody knows they were kiddy-diddling sickos, regardless of whether you like their art.

now imagine(yuk) if there were videos of them having sex with kids. dunn would say innocent until proven guilty lol!

[The Big Dunn]

From a legal perspective that's true.

From a basic deduction and use of your freaking eyes perspective? Come on.

Legally speaking, Michael Jackson was not guilty and Roman Polanski has never been brought to trial. But everybody knows they were kiddy-diddling sickos, regardless of whether you like their art.

Thank you. From a legal perspective its true. Given he was arrested, I think the legal perspective is the right one to take.

Now is he guilty in the court of public opinion, that is a completely different story. You can have any opinion you want. No issue from me. As for me, I will wait until the case plays out.

At no point in this thread or any other did I post Tank didn't do anything or that nothing happened. I posted he is innocent until proven guilty and as much you or anyone else may not like that, that is a fact.

[Robbie Barrett]

now im not going to rush to judgement on these 2 lads! you might want to based on who they are, who they associate with, and what they look like but innocent until proven guilty! were they ever convicted in a court of law? THE ANSWER IS NO!

Yep innocent. That's how it's done in America.

[leeroy84]

Just like the proof was in Whyte's positive right?

Innocent until proven guilty.

Side note - remember when Povetkin came back innocent but Wilder still treat him as guilty.... but then gave drug cheat Ortiz 2 shots at his title!!!

Innocent until proven guilty!!! If it suits lol.