Gervonta ....Allegedly Struck Woman In Face

[mathed]

I told you guys this was gonna happen. Dude is gonna piss his life away like Bonehead did.

[TheMyspaceDayz]

I don’t think people really care about innocent until proven guilty. They’ve seen enough to know they don’t like the guy. Who needs a courtroom to see someone is a dumba$$?

[Vasyl’s dad]

You are trying to gerrymander a basic legal right to win an argument on an online forum. That should be beneath you.

But since you insist on digging in for reasons I can’t fathom I will respond.

Innocent until proven guilty in a court of law is the standard we have for anyone arrested. I didn’t specifically add “ in a court of law” because that is implied. You know this but semantics was the only way you could “win” so you seem to Be intentionally forgetting that.

The cops went to trial. They were found not guilty. Not guilty is a finding that doesn’t equate to innocence in the court of public opinion but does equate to innocence in a legal sense.

So you are asking me about the Rodney king cops from a public opinion perspective- they are not seen as innocent by the public.

From a legal perspective they are because they were not proven guilty. As I responded to another poster tank very easily might get off because Al will use his money.

Now please don’t play dumb again or try to use semantics to win. It was bad enough that idiot daggum brought up the columbine shooters that weren’t arrested.

Tank is innocent until proven guilty. We all know he is. If you and others don’t wish to extend that to him, ok. I will.

You backed yourself into a corner and can’t get out no matter how hard you try, no matter how long your statements get. You yourself said it’s innocent until proven guilty. Now when they are not proven guilty, you try a washing machine spin. It’s right here in the wording, innocent until proven guilty. Since they have not been proven guilty they are innocent.
You can’t just use statements that you think help your cause and then deny how the statement works when it doesn’t fit your agenda.

You: it’s innocent until proven guilty

Reality: cops in Rodney King found not guilty so they are innocent

You: No, not like that!


The court of public opinion doesn’t matter. Or else OJ would have served time for killing his wife.
The court of public opinion also says Tank is guilty. So which way do you want it?

[The Big Dunn]

You backed yourself into a corner and can’t get out no matter how hard you try, no matter how long your statements get. You yourself said it’s innocent until proven guilty. Now when they are not proven guilty, you try a washing machine spin. It’s right here in the wording, innocent until proven guilty. Since they have not been proven guilty they are innocent.
You can’t just use statements that you think help your cause and then deny how the statement works when it doesn’t fit your agenda.

You: it’s innocent until proven guilty

Reality: cops in Rodney King found not guilty so they are innocent

You: No, not like that!


The court of public opinion doesn’t matter. Or else OJ would have served time for killing his wife.
The court of public opinion also says Tank is guilty. So which way do you want it?

Backed myself into a corner? denying how the statement works? Why do you insist on playing dumb? WTF? How is using the basic tenet of American justice backing myself into a corner?

You know exactly what innocent until proven guilty means when discussing a criminal matter, which this is, but instead you are playing a childish semantics game to try and make a point. You look ridiculous doing so.

The cops were found not guilty in a court of law at trial, by a jury. OJ as well was found not guilty, at trial, by a jury. Tank has not had a finding in his matter in a court of law. He hasn't even been into court yet. For you to compare Tank's matter at this stage, arrest, to the outcome of the Rodney King cops trial or the OJ trial shows a lack of intelligence on your part that borders on just plain ******ation.

At this point Tank is innocent until proven guilty.

[Vasyl’s dad]

Backed myself into a corner? denying how the statement works? Why do you insist on playing dumb? WTF? How is using the basic tenet of American justice backing myself into a corner?

You know exactly what innocent until proven guilty means when discussing a criminal matter, which this is, but instead you are playing a childish semantics game to try and make a point. You look ridiculous doing so.

The cops were found not guilty in a court of law at trial, by a jury. OJ as well was found not guilty, at trial, by a jury. Tank has not had a finding in his matter in a court of law. He hasn't even been into court yet. For you to compare Tank's matter at this stage, arrest, to the outcome of the Rodney King cops trial or the OJ trial shows a lack of intelligence on your part that borders on just plain ******ation.

At this point Tank is innocent until proven guilty.

So are the cops who beat Rodney King. In the court of public opinion, Tank is guilty. All goal posts set by you.

[Robbie Barrett]

Here's Big Dunn exposing himself as the hypocrite he is. DLH is the wrong skin colour to be "innocent until proven guilty" it seems.

What continues to defy logic is posters support of odh.

Odh is a junkie that had to go to rehab during the biggest fight his company ever promoted. He’s been accused of sex with a minor. He has been photographed in sexual positions with men. He has been photographed in women’s lingerie and high heels. He is currently facing a lawsuit for fisting a woman that wouldn’t agree to put kitchen utensils in his anus, which is a fetish the hookers that took the pics of him in women’s clothes already detailed. He also tried to hide his out of wedlock son from the world.

THIS is the guy you all have so much faith in?

[The Big Dunn]

Here's Big Dunn exposing himself as the hypocrite he is. DLH is the wrong skin colour to be "innocent until proven guilty" it seems.

WTF? Geez you are just desperate and making yourself look like a complete *******. He is currently facing a lawsuit, not a criminal case.

Where in this post did I say he was guilty of what the woman accused him of?

edit: I see you made the same post in the other thread.

Where did I post he was guilty of anything? The post clearly states "He is currently facing a lawsuit for fisting a woman that wouldn’t agree to put kitchen utensils in his anus".

Since you know I'm right about Tank being innocent until proven guilty you couldn't "win" the debate in the other thread. So now you come in here and falsely state that I made a claim of ODH's guilt, which anyone can see I didn't, so you can turn it into a racism argument which you think will allow you to "win".

You weak f@gg0t. You truly are a ****** piece of shii If you think the argument you are making here works or if you think you are going to scare me away from my contention that Tank is innocent until proven guilty.

Embarrassing, but typical for an insecure British f@gg0t such as yourself. Try a little harder next time.

Now run away like British men always do you cowardly cuck.

[Robbie Barrett]

WTF? Geez you are just desperate and making yourself look like a complete *******. He is currently facing a lawsuit, not a criminal case.

Where in this post did I say he was guilty of what the woman accused him of?

edit: I see you made the same post in the other thread.

Where did I post he was guilty of anything? The post clearly states "He is currently facing a lawsuit for fisting a woman that wouldn’t agree to put kitchen utensils in his anus".

Since you know I'm right about Tank being innocent until proven guilty you couldn't "win" the debate in the other thread. So now you come in here and falsely state that I made a claim of ODH's guilt, which anyone can see I didn't, so you can turn it into a racism argument which you think will allow you to "win".

You weak f@gg0t. You truly are a ****** piece of shii If you think the argument you are making here works or if you think you are going to scare me away from my contention that Tank is innocent until proven guilty.

Embarrassing, but typical for an insecure British f@gg0t such as yourself. Try a little harder next time.

Now run away like British men always do you cowardly cuck.

You're judging him on allegations. Innocent until proven guilty doe. You're the racist POS that many have called you out as being. That's clear now.

[The Big Dunn]

You're judging him on allegations. Innocent until proven guilty doe. You're the racist POS that many have called you out as being. That's clear now.

Now you are backtracking like the dirty little f@gg0t we all know you are. The post clearly states he is facing a lawsuit, which is a fact. In no way does it say he is guilty of that like you claimed.

Now that I destroyed that BS, you come at me about judging him. I'm judging posters that accept his word given everything we know about him that I posted. all have been verified.

You can't refute the standard of innocent until proven guilty. You tried and failed so now you try and turn this in to racism thing by regurgitating claims about me from other posters that couldn't refute something I posted.

You've been so thoroughly emasculated that you can only resort to "throwing everything on the wall and seeing what sticks".

LMFAO! you are only coming off as weaker and more insecure because you had to deviate from the actual discussion.

[Robbie Barrett]

Now you are backtracking like the dirty little f@gg0t we all know you are. The post clearly states he is facing a lawsuit, which is a fact. In no way does it say he is guilty of that like you claimed.

Now that I destroyed that BS, you come at me about judging him. I'm judging posters that accept his word given everything we know about him that I posted. all have been verified.

You can't refute the standard of innocent until proven guilty. You tried and failed so now you try and turn this in to racism thing by regurgitating claims about me from other posters that couldn't refute something I posted.

You've been so thoroughly emasculated that you can only resort to "throwing everything on the wall and seeing what sticks".

LMFAO! you are only coming off as weaker and more insecure because you had to deviate from the actual discussion.

You list allegations and then say "THIS is the guy you all have so much faith in?"

That implies guilt and you're judging him on allegations.


"innocent until prove guilty" doe. Only if you have the right skin colour for Big Dunn.

You're clearly a hypocrite racist. It's as clear as Davis assaulting that woman.