Gervonta ....Allegedly Struck Woman In Face

[The Big Dunn]

now im not going to rush to judgement on these 2 lads! you might want to based on who they are, who they associate with, and what they look like but innocent until proven guilty! were they ever convicted in a court of law? THE ANSWER IS NO!

The columbine shooters weren't arrested so your argument doesn't make any sense. Tank was arrested, so by law he is innocent until proven guilty.

See the difference?

[famicommander]

This post here:

I think it only fair the forum treat Gervonta like it did Kovalev. When Kovalev got accused many forum members withheld judgement. Now with Gervonta it looks like the posters that posted before me have already convicted him.Come on now guys, all of you claim to not be racists in any way. OK, prove it by extending to Tank the same benefit of the doubt you extended Kovalev.

Once Tank is proven guilty then that is the time to criticize and go in on him.

Indicates your motivation is to protect Tank from criticism in the court of public opinion.

[daggum]

Thank you. From a legal perspective its true. Given he was arrested, I think the legal perspective is the right one to take.

Now is he guilty in the court of public opinion, that is a completely different story. You can have any opinion you want. No issue from me. As for me, I will wait until the case plays out.

At no point in this thread or any other did I post Tank didn't do anything or that nothing happened. I posted he is innocent until proven guilty and as much you or anyone else may not like that, that is a fact.

you will wait in hopes that they find a technicality and get off instead of using your own proper judgement and eyes. tell us again how you arent biased though.

[Robbie Barrett]

The columbine shooters weren't arrested so your argument doesn't make any sense. Tank was arrested, so by law he is innocent until proven guilty.

See the difference?

So now your argument is only people that have been arrested are innocent? This just keeps getting better.

[sicko]

******! Like I posted in other threads, Mayweather and Ellerbe they better start focusing on building up new stars because Tank cannot be trusted at all to be the face of their Promotion

[The Big Dunn]

you will wait in hopes that they find a technicality and get off instead of using your own proper judgement and eyes. tell us again how you arent biased though.

I never posted anything like that. You are assuming that because you can't effectively argue against my point that Tank is innocent until proven guilty. YI am biased in favor of the American rule of law.

[daggum]

This post here:


Indicates your motivation is to protect Tank from criticism in the court of public opinion.

hes already laid out in classic projection style his whole purpose of posting on the issue. he said "you only think hes guilty based on who he is, who he associates with, and how he looks" when thats exactly why he is defending a clear crime caught on video

[daggum]

So now your argument is only people that have been arrested are innocent? This just keeps getting better.

his point is if tank hadn't been arrested he would be innocent yes. im not joking

[The Big Dunn]

So now your argument is only people that have been arrested are innocent? This just keeps getting better.

I didn't post that, did I? I notice you didn't take me up on the ban bet.

My argument is once you've been arrested you are innocent until proven guilty. I don't see how there is any debate on this point.

[The Big Dunn]

his point is if tank hadn't been arrested he would be innocent yes. im not joking

Now where did I say that? what is it with you and robbie not being able to read? Each time I post you guys make some crazy interpretation of the post because I will not rush to convict Tank.

It is very simple-he is innocent until proven guilty.