Comments Thread For: Arum: Pacquiao is FOTD - NOT Mayweather - It's Not Even Close!

[hugh grant]

...............if you're a Pacboi

Losses don't matter it's part and parcel of boxing. If Srr and Ali can lose why can't Pac lose?
Floyd losing to Castillo and maidana, and dlh and pac can be overlooked its no problem.

Not fighting in people's backyards, rarely taking risks if you can help it, only fighting 5 years in a decade, beating green fighters with cw and passing them off as great wins is more hard to overlook and ignore and is more pressing. You have to prioritize

[72Boxking]

Sorry, it's Canelo

Cannot lose to Jeff Horn and be FOTD

Cannot retire halfway through the decade and be FOTD

Canelo by default....

[Curtis Harper]

Losses don't matter it's part and parcel of boxing.

But how much of a boner would you Pacbois have gotten if Pac didn't lose to May................

Losing is easy that's why it isn't rewarded (or SHOULDN'T BE)

[Curtis Harper]

Cannot lose to Jeff Horn and be FOTD

Cannot retire halfway through the decade and be FOTD

Canelo by default....

This ^^^^^^^^

............IMHO

[Bautizzle]

Doesn’t matter what pac is continuing to do, him and canelo both lost to Mayweather in the decade along with pac losing to Bradley, Marquez by brutal ko and horn.... even if you think he won the Bradley and horn fight it’s losses on his record

Lol you sound like a butt hurt hater haha pac still was the more active than Floyd and he fought wayyyy better opposition compared to you hero. Not only that, he was champ at the beginning of the decade and at the end of the decade not to mention his been a champ for the last four decades and the oldest WW champ lol no comparison with Floyd fighting a ufc fighter and a little jap kickboxer go cry somewhere

[SchoolTheseCats]

Lol you sound like a butt hurt hater haha pac still was the more active than Floyd and he fought wayyyy better opposition compared to you hero. Not only that, he was champ at the beginning of the decade and at the end of the decade not to mention his been a champ for the last four decades and the oldest WW champ lol no comparison with Floyd fighting a ufc fighter and a little jap kickboxer go cry somewhere

Are you slow? The only people crying are you pacstans that went into hiding when your idol was defeated handily by Floyd.... manny been fighting for 40years as you said he been champ for the past four decades lmao delete your post
And learn how many years are in a decade. And Btw the article is about Floyd being considered for top honors not manny...

[Skyway71]

Losing is easy that's why it isn't rewarded (or SHOULDN'T BE)

Dropping out of high school equals no diploma for your hero, Floyd. But taking 4 years off in the decade and being rewarding FOTD??? The guy who half assed his career in this decade with sucker punches, IV infusions, exhibition bouts, ditching a mando fight w/ young Thurman, etc. Heck, maybe I should call in sick from work cuz I might get rewarded full paycheck under the same conditions as Floyd has. That is... "Lazy Fighter of the Decade" reward.

[v.cassiusali@ya]

The award should go to Mayweather by a large margin as the Clown Of The Decade.

[hugh grant]

Dropping out of high school equals no diploma for your hero, Floyd. But taking 4 years off in the decade and being rewarding FOTD??? The guy who half assed his career in this decade with sucker punches, IV infusions, exhibition bouts, ditching a mando fight w/ young Thurman, etc. Heck, maybe I should call in sick from work cuz I might get rewarded full paycheck under the same conditions as Floyd has. That is... "Lazy Fighter of the Decade" reward.

True, Floyd always getting advantages by doing less. The fact he fights less means he can give more in each performance whereas if your fighting 20 times in a decade like Pac or nel o you have to pace yourself more in each fight.
Floyd v pac, Floyd was literally going all out even though it might not have looked it as he knows he's retiring soon whilst Pac knows he's got many more gruelling fights in future. So Pac was disadvantaged against floyd as he was pacing himself as he knew he was fighting for another 10 years against undefeated young lions like thurman

[JLC]

The Thurman Pacquiao beat would’ve tore up the Canelo Floyd beat, so there’s that.

But no, Floyd didn’t have any great wins this decade.
His best win this decade was Mcgregor.

The fresh off surgery Thurman who squeaked by Porter and Danny would have TORE CANELO UP? Lol. You guys are something else. Same Thurman that almost got stopped by Josesito Lopez, right ? Ok.

Mac Gregor was a better win than Pacquiao, Canelo, Cotto. Ok. You folk don’t want to talk boxing you just want to be trolls. Lol

And I don’t mean to diminish Keith. He’s a good fighter. And it isn’t like Alvarez didn’t have trouble with some fighters up to that point either. But come on people. Don’t let your disdain for mayeeather allow you to make up ridiculous narratives. In no universe is manny’s win over Thurman better than Floyd’s win over Pacquiao, Canelo, or Cotto.