Nothing in.rule book.says losing in.decade is a barrier to being fotd. Retiring 5 years too early like Floyd did is more of a barrier to being a serious Fotd contender, any fair person.would excuse Pac losses.
Pac s had double the amount of fights Floyd had, and Floyd hasn't fought double the dangerous quality opponents so how does what Floyd did equate to what Pac achieved? With Floyd fighting so much less, you d expect Floyd would have to fight killers row to make up for it. Maybe in 2016 Floyd should have fought ggg, in year 2017 fought thurman, in year 2018 fought spence, and kovakev in 2019 rather than ortiz, maidana, guerrero, Connor and tenshin.
you cant be the victim of the KO of the decade and still be FOTD lol.. don't work like that. and u cant be losing to jeff horn
you cant be the victim of the KO of the decade and still be FOTD lol.. don't work like that. and u cant be losing to jeff horn
You can actually. Losing to horn is less of a barrier to being Fotd than not ever fighting abroad and fighting only 5 years.
Originally posted by JLC
The fresh off surgery Thurman who squeaked by Porter and Danny would have TORE CANELO UP? Lol. You guys are something else. Same Thurman that almost got stopped by Josesito Lopez, right ? Ok.
Mac Gregor was a better win than Pacquiao, Canelo, Cotto. Ok. You folk don’t want to talk boxing you just want to be trolls. Lol
And I don’t mean to diminish Keith. He’s a good fighter. And it isn’t like Alvarez didn’t have trouble with some fighters up to that point either. But come on people. Don’t let your disdain for mayeeather allow you to make up ridiculous narratives. In no universe is manny’s win over Thurman better than Floyd’s win over Pacquiao, Canelo, or Cotto.
I remember a poll was made at time Pac fought Bradley and Floyd fought cott o about who had tougher opponent. Bradley was considered by far tougher opponent. So don't revise history. And Pac beat Bradley 3 times if not robbery
You can actually. Losing to horn is less of a barrier to being Fotd than not ever fighting abroad and fighting only 5 years.
I remember a poll was made at time Pac fought Bradley and Floyd fought cott o about who had tougher opponent. Bradley was considered by far tougher opponent. So don't revise history. And Pac beat Bradley 3 times if not robbery
You know I'm not lying. Floyd was fighting used goods, whilst Bradley hadn't lost just like thurman and floyd.
So why wouldn't Bradley be considered tougher opponent? COtto fighting at 154 a weight he was getting used to and finding his feet in, don't make him God at that weight, doesn't suddenly become superman
You know I'm not lying. Floyd was fighting used goods, whilst Bradley hadn't lost just like thurman and floyd.
So why wouldn't Bradley be considered tougher opponent? COtto fighting at 154 a weight he was getting used to and finding his feet in, don't make him God at that weight, doesn't suddenly become superman
You know I'm not lying. Floyd s the only one kidding you thinking he's done more in 10 years than his peers have. Your fellow Floyd fans are the wronguns, not Floyd actually. Thinking if they keep repeating flouds done more in 5 years than his peers have done in 10 if only one gullible person in earth believes it would be deemed succesful
You can actually. Losing to horn is less of a barrier to being Fotd than not ever fighting abroad and fighting only 5 years.
now i see you're a troll.
losing to horn is an automatic disqualification. add to that the marquez KO... pac shouldn't even considered. it should only be floyd, ward and canelo.
Comment