Mayweather wins fighter if the decade yahoo.com

[IceTrayDaGang]

I just dont see how you can say him fighting

Pacquiao at 38
Canelo at 36

just those 2 is not taking a risk..that would mean you really have high standards for floyd...

fighting manny 5-6 years later and after getting ko'd from marquez

fighting canelo at 152 but really wanted canelo at 147

damm those are some risky fights.....

[MEXICAN STYLE]

Saul 'Canelo' Alvarez will dominate the upcoming decade.

[IceTrayDaGang]

from my understanding shot meant not being able to pull the trigger or get out of the way of shots...meaning the mind sees things the body isnt able to react to...is that the same definition you use?

so you're saying pac aint getting hit??? so you saying pac has been finishing his fights when his opponent is hurt??

this is ALL signs of a fighter being shot! he had thurman hurt, couldnt finish it. had horn hurt, couldnt finish it. and many more. do you think this would be the case if this was 2008-2011 pac? jesus!!

[IceTrayDaGang]

Manny beating Thurman is better then Floyd beating Manny himself? how does that make sense?

and age doesnt=prime does it?? Thurman was out for almost 2 years with injuries and is out again with injuries..Yet you will discredit the Manny win for Floyd..how does that make sense?

of course! when floyd beat manny, that was 5-6 years later the initiate date that they were gonna fight. floyd also made the fight right away after pac got knocked out by marquez...

now manny being 40, even after being ko'd silly by marquez, he came back and beat thurman!! who was consider one of the top ww at the moment. yes, this was a better win then floyd beating pac.

you're using the excuse that thurman was out for 2 years but you failed to see that when floyd beat pac, manny already got ko'd by marquez!!!!! which one is worst to you? being inactive for 2 years but is fresh or being active and then getting ko'd, slept, zZzzZZzZZZ!!!??

[djtmal]

Manny beating Thurman is better then Floyd beating Manny himself? how does that make sense?

and age doesnt=prime does it?? Thurman was out for almost 2 years with injuries and is out again with injuries..Yet you will discredit the Manny win for Floyd..how does that make sense?

Say what??? You gotta be fu**king kidding me.

Floyd barely outpouting a shopworn Manny who had already been ko'd by Marquez, is better than Manny beating a prime, undefeated two belt champ Thurman who never came close to being beat?

Please man stop injecting all of the excuses, and git yo head out of Floyd's a$$ already. Its embarrassing.

[Larry the boss]

fighting manny 5-6 years later and after getting ko'd from marquez

fighting canelo at 152 but really wanted canelo at 147

damm those are some risky fights.....

Did Floyd not age? was he not 38??

Is Manny still not p4p top 10 and a world champ??

the fight before Canelo was 153 was he not?? I can agree the catchweight should be talked about but can you honestly say those 2 fights were not risks?

[Larry the boss]

of course! when floyd beat manny, that was 5-6 years later the initiate date that they were gonna fight. floyd also made the fight right away after pac got knocked out by marquez...

now manny being 40, even after being ko'd silly by marquez, he came back and beat thurman!! who was consider one of the top ww at the moment. yes, this was a better win then floyd beating pac.

you're using the excuse that thurman was out for 2 years but you failed to see that when floyd beat pac, manny already got ko'd by marquez!!!!! which one is worst to you? being inactive for 2 years but is fresh or being active and then getting ko'd, slept, zZzzZZzZZZ!!!??

How did floyd make the fight right away after jmm ko'd manny..Jmm stopped manny in 2012..floyd fought him in 2015


And if the ko was so damaging why in 2019 4 years after the fight is he still a top p4p boxer and a world champion?

[IceTrayDaGang]

Did Floyd not age? was he not 38??

Is Manny still not p4p top 10 and a world champ??

the fight before Canelo was 153 was he not?? I can agree the catchweight should be talked about but can you honestly say those 2 fights were not risks?

of course floyd aged.. but this is not about who was older. you're trying to use the excuse that thurman was out for 2 years so the win wasnt impressive.

so if going by your logic, when floyd beat manny, pac already got ko'd! so which one is worst to you? the guy who was inactive for 2 years but is still fresh or the guy who got knocked out?

you're trying to discredit pac's win over thurman because thurman was inactive for 2 years but you want us to give floyd full credit for beating pac 5-6 years later who was ko'd? you see your flaws in this?

[Larry the boss]

Say what??? You gotta be fu**king kidding me.

Floyd barely outpouting a shopworn Manny who had already been ko'd by Marquez, is better than Manny beating a prime, undefeated two belt champ Thurman who never came close to being beat?

Please man stop injecting all of the excuses, and git yo head out of Floyd's a$$ already. Its embarrassing.

If Manny was shopworn in 2015..why is he still a top 10 p4p fighter and world champion now? seems like you are the one coming up with excuses to discredit floyd win..you are making no sense

[djtmal]

Did Floyd not age? was he not 38??

Is Manny still not p4p top 10 and a world champ??

the fight before Canelo was 153 was he not?? I can agree the catchweight should be talked about but can you honestly say those 2 fights were not risks?

Fighting a shopworn, already ko'd Manny was absolutely not a risk. I don't care how high he was ranked on anybody's p4p list before you try to pimp that excuse. Fighting the Manny who had sparked out Cotto and Hatton, now THAT was a risk. See the difference?
I don't see why that is so hard to comprehend.