Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Hearn Offers Charlo One-Fight Deal For Andrade May Unification

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by yankees7448 View Post
    For the millionth time. It absolutely does not. Cut out this strawman bullsh it.
    Stop misusing strawman. YOU said that someone can't be a star if someone else does way more PPV than they do. Your words. It's not my fault Mayweather did so much more PPV than everyone else that by your definition, nobody is a star except Mayweather. Own your **** bro.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF View Post
      Stop misusing strawman. YOU said that someone can't be a star if someone else does way more PPV than they do. Your words. It's not my fault Mayweather did so much more PPV than everyone else that by your definition, nobody is a star except Mayweather. Own your **** bro.
      Own your own sh it bro. Stop making up arguments I never made to avoid admitting you're wrong.

      There is a difference between being a star and being a popular fighter. Canelo is a star. Wilder is a popular fighter.

      Comment


      • Arguing who is more popular/A-Side between Charlo and Andrade is arguing who is the taller midget. Sure, IMO Charlo is the taller midget, but who cares? They are both pretty unknown and they both need each other. I could care less which platform its on, but If had to choose would pick Showtime (NOT PPV) because they have the best production, otherwise just ****ing make the fights.

        Comment


        • This offer just seems like PR BS. Hearn knows Haymon is in a legal tussle and isn't recognizing the WBO, so making this offers seems like he knows its going to be rejected.

          Why not instead offer the money for a Jacobs fight. Al and Danny have positive history together and the WBO isn't invovled.

          Then put Andrade in with Canelo or GGG since they are on dazn and those unification are much easier to make.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by yankees7448 View Post
            Own your own sh it bro. Stop making up arguments I never made to avoid admitting you're wrong.

            There is a difference between being a star and being a popular fighter. Canelo is a star. Wilder is a popular fighter.
            Your argument was that you can't be a star if someone else's PPVs sell twice as well. So just like Wilder isn't a star compared to Canelo, BY YOUR OWN LOGIC, Canelo isn't a star compared to Mayweather.

            Which means, BY YOUR OWN LOGIC, Mayweather is the only star in boxing history as his PPV performance is head and shoulders above every other fighter there has ever been.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF View Post
              Your argument was that you can't be a star if someone else's PPVs sell twice as well.
              What I am saying is that there is a distinction between a real star and a popular fighter. Canelo Alvarez is a genuine star. Deontay Wilder is just a popular fighter. You want to call him a star because he's your baby daddy. Be my guest. But he's not really a star yet.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by yankees7448 View Post
                What I am saying is that there is a distinction between a real star and a popular fighter. Canelo Alvarez is a genuine star. Deontay Wilder is just a popular fighter. You want to call him a star because he's your baby daddy. Be my guest. But he's not really a star yet.
                Guys earning $10M+ purses aren't stars? That's like saying Mayweather wasn't a star before he faced De La Hoya, even though he only got the job due to being a star in the sport already.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by yankees7448 View Post
                  What I am saying is that there is a distinction between a real star and a popular fighter. Canelo Alvarez is a genuine star. Deontay Wilder is just a popular fighter. You want to call him a star because he's your baby daddy. Be my guest. But he's not really a star yet.
                  we both agreed that whether you're a star or not is subjective. I told you I don't argue opinions, but you insisted.

                  Wilder is the most successful American boxer. Wilder is one of the top five most successful boxers in the world. By most definitions, he is absolutely a star.

                  And by your very strict definition, he isnt. Which is fine. You just dont like that Ive correctly pointed out that by your definition, nobody has ever been a star except for Mayweather. Too bad. You sunk yourself with your own words.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF View Post
                    This isn't a discussion about bragging rights. It's a discussion of who would be the A-side in the fight.

                    Charlo has 300,000 instagram followers. Andrade has 100,000. Charlo is clearly more well known. You know it. I know it. You're arguing for the sake of arguing.
                    So now we're basing an A and B side based on Instagram followers??
                    So if Ryan Garcia was to fight Lomachenko then Ryan is the A side cause he has more Instagram followers???
                    You sure love making some ridiculous arguments....
                    You should of been a lawyer since you love to argue so much.
                    But you aren't smart enough to be a lawyer so you gotta settle for arguing nonsense on here i see....

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by doom_specialist View Post
                      Guys earning $10M+ purses aren't stars? That's like saying Mayweather wasn't a star before he faced De La Hoya, even though he only got the job due to being a star in the sport already.
                      It takes more than a big paycheck to be a star.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP