Boxing before 1980 doesn't exist for me

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Mooshashi
    Banned
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Jul 2013
    • 9234
    • 745
    • 176
    • 178,983

    #41
    Originally posted by tjones1989
    Those were the lgit caveman eras. All fighters in 1950 would get destroyed by the current crop of steroid enhanced super fighters; they have no chance. Even SRR would lose to a 147 floyd mayweather of today, even at 42 years old.
    [IMG]https://media3.*****.com/media/8oh42nM14t50Q/*****.gif[/IMG]

    Comment

    • KillaMane26
      Big Boi Beezy
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Apr 2014
      • 16299
      • 2,565
      • 533
      • 174,475

      #42
      Since boxing didnt exist b4 1980 then keep your mouth shut when discussing ATGs.

      I can't take anyone serious who doesn't respect the history of boxing.

      Like the new rappers comparing themselves to 90s Rap.

      Comment

      • Roadblock
        Undisputed Champion
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • May 2006
        • 14031
        • 3,535
        • 428
        • 108,713

        #43
        Courage and resilience has not changed in man for 1000s of years, education and skills have become better and training is more advanced so I agree the modern fighter, the modern athlete is faster stronger and has more endurance than years gone by, but if you took say Robinson or any other great champion and trained him by today's standards you will have a better version than what they were in their time which would equalize the differences.

        Todays guys in a time warp would win not because they have more courage and determination but because they are more technically refined, train them the same and then they are equal.

        Comment

        • Imaboxingfan
          Up and Comer
          Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
          • Jun 2019
          • 47
          • 4
          • 1
          • 3,114

          #44
          The boxers of yesteryear had more skills and were battle tested. Less weight classes crowded better fighters into having to fight eachother before title fights. We have belt holders now who have never fought a top 10 opponent.

          I think when you cut to the core of the argument the best fighters of an era could compete against the best of any era.

          Comment

          • Richard Hamilton
            Interim Champion
            Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
            • Dec 2013
            • 967
            • 102
            • 9
            • 20,741

            #45
            You have never boxed so how do you know what you are watching?

            Comment

            • Santa_
              Banned
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Mar 2015
              • 14673
              • 1,417
              • 378
              • 143,233

              #46
              Originally posted by just the facts
              This is hilarious! Panty Cruz won't even fight the best feathers of today but magically he'd beat the crap out of arguably the best feathers of all time? GTFOH!

              Grow up...

              Comment

              • just the facts
                Undisputed Champion
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Jan 2014
                • 13780
                • 2,435
                • 1,021
                • 88,113

                #47
                Originally posted by Santa_
                Grow up...
                Tell me again how Panty Cruz with zero power and not much speed (hand or foot) would beat the everloving crap out of Pep (arguably the best feather of all time). Panty Cruz won't even fight Russell or Rigo but you want us to believe he beats the greats? Hero worship is okay I guess but you have to keep your feet on the ground.

                Comment

                • FinitoxDinamita
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Sep 2016
                  • 16104
                  • 2,214
                  • 2,185
                  • 281,604

                  #48
                  Even as a hardcore Boxing fan, I dont care about the black and white era before the 30s..

                  I think Jack Johnson is a bum. He is like Deonte wilder of stone age. What is so great about that guy again? And if you havent see him live, opinions dont hold weight.

                  I laugh when I see dudes praising fighters from 1920s. Talking about em as if they lived through the era when infact they just heard stories from grandpas.

                  So yea I dont talk about fighters those eras because Im not thrilled watching them. I find it primitive and uninteresting.

                  Im about 1980s-present as well..

                  Comment

                  • charliepaerker
                    Contender
                    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                    • Nov 2013
                    • 269
                    • 89
                    • 8,374
                    • 10,251

                    #49
                    What a ****** thread. All the fundamentals that boxers work with and build on today come from the hard work and brilliant minds of yesteryear. Without them boxing wouldn't exist

                    Comment

                    • Derranged
                      Banned
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Oct 2005
                      • 46593
                      • 2,126
                      • 1,350
                      • 162,628

                      #50
                      1970's Foreman would beat most heavyweights of any era, including today.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP