Spence is the most overrated boxer out there, apart from Wilder and Charlo Twins. A guy with man t.its shouldn't be ranked above real warriors on any list.
They’re in the same weight class and Spence would kick Pacquiao’s butt.
Spence also beat Kell Brook, who was clearly the best welterweight of the time. That win passed the mantle to Spence who hasn’t relinquished it.
Funny, since most people at the time told me Brook was a fraud. Interesting he turned into the best of the time after Spence beat him.
Nevertheless, I shouldn't have to mention Pacquiao's resume not to mention he beat a guy in Thurman recently who was undefeated and has a better resume than Spence or anyone Spence has fought.
The Jeff Horn loss brought him down. I'm not saying he lost, that's another discussion. They have a common opponent in Chrish Algieri and Errol got him out of there. If they were to meet I think Errol would be too much for him. Just my opinion, I'm not saying I'm right but biased on their last couple performances my money is on Errol. With or without testing.
I do know that. They don’t have to fight for me to know that.
Pacquiao lost to Jeff Horn, fought a shot Lucas Matthysse for a pretend title, fought an Arden Broner who hasn’t had a convincing win in almost four years and beat a version of Keith Thurman who almost got ktfo by Jesisito López.
He’s also 40-something years old.
Spence is a top P4P talent in his prime. He’s bigger and has had better wins than Pacquiao recently.
He would murder Pacquiao and I doubt that fight ever happens.
Originally posted by strykr619
You don't know this since they haven't fought, sorry but Spence should NOT be above Pacquiao.
I don’t think he should be ranked ahead of him to be honest. I think most fans would agree that Pacman resume is way more stacked than Spence at this point. That doesn’t mean Spence cannot beat Pacman if they fought at this point in time. But going just be resume I would have Pacman ahead.
They’re in the same weight class and Spence would kick Pacquiao’s butt.
Spence also beat Kell Brook, who was clearly the best welterweight of the time. That win passed the mantle to Spence who hasn’t relinquished it.
Why was Brook the best welter at the time when all he ever did was beat a sht(as a lot like to say it) Porter, who Thurman also beat. Thurman also had better wins outside of Porter, Brook has never done anything before or after Porter, so how, why?
Comment