Comments Thread For: Lomachenko: I'm P4P #1 - Crawford is Second, Canelo is Third

[Mirus]

Did you think Jacobs won?

For me Canelo won, but it was very close fight. Controvercial, because even some famous boxers think Jacobs won.

Juan Manuel Marquez: I Had 115-113 - Jacobs Beating Canelo!

https://www.boxingscene.com/juan-man...canelo--138726


Andrade: I Thought Jacobs Did Enough To Beat Canelo - I Want Next!

https://www.boxingscene.com/andrade-...t-next--138718

[BoxingIsGreat]

Can't be on the list as he has a loss he never avenged, puts Canelo on list.
Do you actually read your own posts?

In fairness, he put GGG, who has a loss, on the list, too. I think he meant in terms of the weight of the loss. Canelo lost to one of the best boxers ever in Floyd, while Loma lost to a tough journeyman with 12 losses in Salido.

[andocom]

In fairness, he put GGG, who has a loss, on the list, too. I think he meant in terms of the weight of the loss. Canelo lost to one of the best boxers ever in Floyd, while Loma lost to a tough journeyman with 12 losses in Salido.

In his second pro fight for a world title in a split decision.

Regardless it is a moronic justification, guy can't be on a P4P list as he lost his second pro fight, please. No one is forcing him to rate Loma, just don't try and justify it with logic like that.

[andocom]

None of the current boxers are #1 anything. Someone needs to step it up soon.

Well someone is the current P4P #1, thats the way it works.

[alexjust]

He can't be pound for pound with that loss on his record that he never avenged. 1. Crawford 2. Spence 3. Wilder 4. Canelo 5. Ggg

Did Canelo avenge his loss? That was a loss worth avenging as opposed to a loss to a low life balls hitter. P4P for you means a fighter must never have an unavenged loss, huh? I'd be concerned for my eyes if I read your response to how you would rate Tyson, Ali, Hagler, Robinson...top 90?

[Fire4231]

If Loma is that dude move up to 140.... crickets!

[James Hunt]

Fury is p4p #1

Whether you're just trolling or too dumb to understand what P4P means.
Once more:
P4P=amount of performance per pound of weight aka how they would perform if they all had the same weight.

This practically means that 3 highest and 3 lowest divisions are almost always automatically out of competition for the top 5 P4P list. Top 3 divisions are out bcs of a lack of agility, 3 lowest divisions bcs of a lack of power.
Capisce?

[alexjust]

In fairness, he put GGG, who has a loss, on the list, too. I think he meant in terms of the weight of the loss. Canelo lost to one of the best boxers ever in Floyd, while Loma lost to a tough journeyman with 12 losses in Salido.

The decision was so controversial and Loma has done so well after that fight, that nobody seems to be even mentioning Salido. Unless all of the Salido fans get logical and conclude that Salido is a better fighter than Loma and must be at least top 10 P4P. Does this sound right to you?

[ReggieKray]

Cant argue with the guy he has a pretty good case to be at the Top P4P but he shouldnt be no. 1... His lose against Salido and knocked down by Linares says something about him that he is not that very Special. We still need to see for the years to come, but for now putting him no.1 is a Godly generousity.

First post on this thread that makes sense.

[BillyBoxing]

In his second pro fight for a world title in a split decision.

Regardless it is a moronic justification, guy can't be on a P4P list as he lost his second pro fight, please. No one is forcing him to rate Loma, just don't try and justify it with logic like that.

I guess Ali and Robinson can't be GOATs.

It has to be Joe Calzaghe, Marciano or Floydie and their perfect records...