Comments Thread For: Lomachenko: I'm P4P #1 - Crawford is Second, Canelo is Third
Collapse
-
I just love people who rewrite history. Boxingrec and any site you visit had Canelo winning GGG x1 and draw, he beat Lara, he beat Jacobs. The only other folks that attempt to rewrite history are ********. Then again in today’s pumpkin ****e, millennial generation nothing surprises me.Comment
-
I just love people who rewrite history. Boxingrec and any site you visit had Canelo winning GGG x1 and draw, he beat Lara, he beat Jacobs. The only other folks that attempt to rewrite history are ********. Then again in today’s pumpkin ****e, millennial generation nothing surprises me.Comment
-
Comment
-
I just love people who rewrite history. Boxingrec and any site you visit had Canelo winning GGG x1 and draw, he beat Lara, he beat Jacobs. The only other folks that attempt to rewrite history are ********. Then again in today’s pumpkin ****e, millennial generation nothing surprises me.Comment
-
Comment
-
Cant argue with the guy he has a pretty good case to be at the Top P4P but he shouldnt be no. 1... His lose against Salido and knocked down by Linares says something about him that he is not that very Special. We still need to see for the years to come, but for now putting him no.1 is a Godly generousity.Comment
-
Comment
-
I got terrence, uysk, ggg, inoue and maybe loma at 5.
I think the bigger question is there definitive criteria that a fighter has to meet to become p4p number 1, because I can tell even though boxrec and ring and espn has loma 1 and 2 I cant really put him past 5 or 6 maybe even 7.
Some please enlighten me.Comment
Comment