I find it funny now that some of the exact same posters claiming they wanted Teofimio in with Loma (I know they didn't) are already saying Teo is trash because that fight is either going to happen or Teo will lose to Commey or duck Loma. It reminds me of the same posters and one's of their ilk picked Walters and then went nuts for Rigo and stated "size won't matter it's all about skill and Loma is a caveman and Rigo is a god". Some (I can name them) even picked Russell and Linares run this nonsense still.
Good point on GGG. Everyone here said he's a terrible fighter and a bum, so how did Canelo, after failing two PED tests elevate to being the best fighter based on two fights that the majority feel at best he's 1-1 but most feel he's either 0-1-1 or 0-2 against. Only the fanboys and a few racists think that the 1-0-1 mark is correct.
I think Loma is a clear #1. I believe he's in for a tough fight this weekend but he'll win. Crawford is probably #2 but unfortunately his competition post Postol is bordering on terrible. If he gets all the credit in the world for becoming undisputed then I hope those that did so afford the same praise for Loma when he wins all four belts as it's against better opponents. (Linares, Pedraza, Campbell, Commey/The god Teo winner are ALL better than Indongo and Dulorme. Crawford is my favorite fighter but washed up Khan, the next guy, Benavidez, Horn, Molina and a two fight a year schedule isn't going to cut it. It's not pathetic like Gervonta or Charlo schedule but it's enough to consider Inoue, Usyk ahead of him if you stock resume that much.
Mods should do their jobs and just ban some of the garbage ass posters in this thread.
Come on mods, these guys arent even fans of the sport. A child knows better than these grown pathetic men.
I concur. The site is overloaded with trolls, fanboys, racists and children that are barely into the sport. It's why it's the laughing stock of all forums and on social media. They are ok with the volume over the quality. I've said there should be an immediate 100-200 bannings and then a qualification process to be allowed to post and further to create a thread.
There's one spastic moron who derails every thread with about 10-20 posts straight just quoting people whilst adding zero. Just fanboy stuff and crying. Nobody talks to him and he's blocked by most but it's still an eye saw and makes the place look even worse.
Lomachenko is clearly #1 P4P. It's not his fault the guys he's fought weren't on his level. He's fought nothing but champions and contenders like Rigondeaux, Russell, and Linares. He's also the fastest 3 weight champion in boxing history.
You got a problem with TC being #1 or #2? Who’s he beat that’s so much better than loma’s opposition? Who gives a damn about p4p anyway.
Bud is up there, I got no problem with him being #2..l0m0 is a bob arum/espn hype machine & that I can't ride with. Its the SAME SHET hbo was doing with the "Gatti List" there version of P4P List & look where those idiots ended up, out of business
That poster was one of the most vocal and repetitive of what Rigo was going to do to Loma and how skilled Rigo was. Said size didn't matter, the fight wouldn't be close etc;
"Full of Shet" chris ^
You was the poster saying Pvssy-G is going to murder Nelo, kovalev is going to kill S.O.G., pacquiao is going to dominate Mayweather.
As a guy who's a straight up boxing fan & doesn't dabble in the BS promoter/network/racial agendas:
Loma
Crawford
Inoue
Usyk
Canelo
GGG
Estrada
Spence
Pacman
Bivol (admittedly just the eye test, not a killer resume just yet)
Give p4p edge to Canelo over GGG since he got the "official" victory, but I rate that series as 1-0-1 GGG with Canelo being a narrow favorite in a potential 3rd fight.
Prograis/Taylor winner should bump up IMO. I'm basing Spence's position on what I believe will be an inevitable unification W in an rather non-competitive fight, cuz Pac obviously has the superior resume.
Agreed on the need for the mods to clean things up around here. Just a buncha dishonest fanboy vitriol being spewed, none of it is to be taken seriously.
Comment