Pacquiao hasn’t lost a fight since 2012.

[marco55]

Pacquiao beat Mayweather. Between rounds in his corner Floyd Sr. was heard on open mic saying this to his son; 'What's wrong with you,...……….you act like you're afraid of the man. You better start fighting or you're going to lose',...……………...Sr. didn't know he was on an open mic, but that's the only time you'll hear the truth. This was middle of the fight, his own father said he was losing. Compubox had Floyd landing 90 more punches, but 2 analysis after the fact agreed that Pacquiao landed about 40 more then Floyd. CompuBox wrong by 130 punches or paid off? Two separate teams that were unbiased and had no interest in the fight at all, came up with nearly identical punches landed totals, an indication that there were accurate. According to correct punch totals, Pacquiao was the aggressor and therefore should have won the fight. One judge had it 10 rounds to 2 rounds for Floyd, obviously paid off. Nobody but a liar saw a 10-2 fight. Evander Holyfield said that Pacquiao won and he was at ring side. He said one guy wants to fight but the other guy is trying not to fight, so who do you score it for? He should know, the commentators never know.

[Nash out]

Pac beat Bradley wide and edged Horn, but come on, he lost 118-110 to TBE. He won Rounds 4 and 6. And that was a near prime Pac vs a well past prime TBE. Look at Pac now over 4 years later, still great.

[IronDanHamza]

He's actually lost twice since 2012.

Once clearly by Mayweather and second in close fight to Jeff Horn.

[GrandpaBernard]

Nah Marquez got him good in fight 3

9-3 to the Amigo

[tophat1]

Someone has been drinking from the fountain of delusion.

[GrandpaBernard]

I don't like how they robbed manny in Timmeh 1 & Australia only to gift manny after JMM 3

wtf

[FredWreck]

Pac beat Bradley wide and edged Horn, but come on, he lost 118-110 to TBE. He won Rounds 4 and 6. And that was a near prime Pac vs a well past prime TBE. Look at Pac now over 4 years later, still great.

Nah I’d say 7-5 Mayweather at best. Mayweather landed a bit more pitty pat jabs, it doesn’t mean much but for him & Vegas it means everything.
PAC landed more effective punches and had Mayweather back footing.

The fight was actually closer than people think you gotta think to yourself, if Mayweather won, then why are the only highlights of the fight showing Pacquiao’s punches? When PAC landed it would push Floyd back every time.

One jab and then a hug is not a highlight.

Like I said 7-5 Mayweather at best.

But the point is, everybody “lost” to Mayweather. So that loss doesn’t indicate anything in regards to Pacquiao’s talent or skill. He’s still just as dominant. Hence Keith Thurman victory.

[boliodogs]

He beat both Horn and Bradley by a mile in my opinion. May weather clearly beat him about 6 rounds to 4 in my opinion but Pac would win a rematch today. Marquez won by KO and turned down big money for a 5th fight. Pac would have defeated old Marquez in a 5th fight in my opinion. They both fought Bradley about the same time and Pac easily beat Bradley a third time while Bradley clearly beat Marquez.

[CHOWWOKKA]

No we’re analzying it in whole.
Bradley 1 and Horn were obviously both robberies.

Boxing fans know that.

Marquez 4 KO was IN FACT influenced by the Bradley 1 robbery.

Mayweather, well, it’s Mayweather.

None of those bouts indicate PAC losing skills.
That’s why he just dominated Thurman. Big facts.

Where would you say Pacquiao is in regards to his prime? Like 80% 70%?

[The Big Dunn]

How can anyone treat this thread seriously?

The TS posts that manny hasn’t lost, then posts that he in fact lost to Floyd.

If losses are not a big deal, why do diehard fans of Manny and other guys on this board ( most recently Loma) go out of their way to explain away the losses?

The losses happened. They are real. Accept them and move on.