Pacquiao hasn’t lost a fight since 2012.

[marco55]

You're in the minority world wide. In every country except the U.S. the sentiment favored Pacquiao as the winner. When Pacquiao was robbed in the first fight with Bradley, he didn't complain. When he was robbed against Horn, he said that I'm a professional and I respect the judges opinion. After the fight with Floyd he said, I think that I won the fight, he didn't do anything. Pacquiao is a man of such character that if he says that he won the fight, then he won the fight. If Floyd says that he thinks that he won the fight, then Pacquiao won the fight.

[marco55]

Pacquiao beat Floyd's ass with one hand. He visibly hurt Floyd twice, Floyd went out of his way to use his laces trying to cut Pacquiao, that was as close as he got to hurting Pacquiao.

[just the facts]

Pacquiao beat Floyd's ass with one hand. He visibly hurt Floyd twice, Floyd went out of his way to use his laces trying to cut Pacquiao, that was as close as he got to hurting Pacquiao.

Do you post for shock value or are you truly dumb enough to believe the ignorant bu!!shyte you post?

[marco55]

You've kept Floyd fans with a perfect record of lying about everything you say. Pacquiao lost 7 fights in his career, one at the age of 16, another at 19, the Horn robbery at 38. You're the only person on Earth that believes a fighter is in his prime at 16, 19 and at 38. Why do you lie at every turn when defending Floyd, you leave everyone with the impression that lying is an absolute if defending Floyd is the task.

[marco55]

I respond with truth, a concept lost on Floyd fans.

[marco55]

Pacquiao has had one boring fight in his 71 fight career. Floyd has had 50 boring fights in his 50 cherry picked fight career. Who does that make responsible for a less then thrilling run, hide and hold session?

[marco55]

Pacquiao and Floyd fought for the better part of 2 decades side by side you could say. In the decade of the 2000's, both were at there best throughout the decade, and Pacquiao was awarded fighter of that decade. Floyd was gifted, I mean given fighter of the decade in the decade of the 2010's , a time when neither was at their best and whereby Floyd should have been bypassed for the award due to a low number overall of cherry picked gifted decisions. Putting that aside for the moment, if considering that each was in their prime when Pacquiao won the award, then that substantiates the fact that Pacquiao was a better fighter given a comparison when in their prime. Floyd fans will have to respond to this truth by saying fxxx you, their standard response when truth is on the table.

[Roadblock]

I respond with truth, a concept lost on Floyd fans.

An idiot fanboys truth, boxing under the bonnet you have no idea !

[BoomBapTrap]

I bet she went out fighting which is more than Pacquiao did. McGregor tried harder to win than Pacquiao. One of the most pathetic performances ever seen in the ring.

I feel bad for the kids.
They had to testify in court.

If you seen your dad beating the snot out of your mom, punching her in the gut and kicking her in the face, what would you do?

[Ca$ual Fan]

Accurate analysis.

PAC was robbed terribly in the Bradley 1 fight which led to his frustration in that 4th Marquez fight, he let his emotions come into play and got reckless, caught by a perfectly countered PED Marquez fist.

PAC had some bad decision making through his career and was screwed by Arum quite a bit. He should’ve turned down a 4th Marquez fight, no need.

Dude as a fan of Pacquiao, the Marquez 3rd was the bad decision not the 4th. The 3rd was considered a cherrypick which has gone very wrong. Nobody asked for that fight. It was one of the ******est decisions in Pacquiao's career.

If there was one thing Pac should have thanked Floyd for, it was removing his rivalry against Marquez. A rivalry he couldn't overcome and Floyd did him a huge favor. The Marquez rivalry was dead, Pac (or the greedy Bob) revived it. The 4th fight became necessary after the 3rd fight tragedy.