Pacquiao hasn’t lost a fight since 2012.
Collapse
-
No it’s actually the truth. If you followed boxing and Pacquiaos career then you would know. But you don’t. You just come on here to converse with dudes because you’re gay. But hey, whatever floats your boat Mr. Banana in your tailpipe.Comment
-
Comment
-
-
It's a good thing that you dont post very often, it really is. Have you spent 4 years researching this? You need to stop, it's not healthy.Pacquiao beat Mayweather. Between rounds in his corner Floyd Sr. was heard on open mic saying this to his son; 'What's wrong with you,...……….you act like you're afraid of the man. You better start fighting or you're going to lose',...……………...Sr. didn't know he was on an open mic, but that's the only time you'll hear the truth. This was middle of the fight, his own father said he was losing. Compubox had Floyd landing 90 more punches, but 2 analysis after the fact agreed that Pacquiao landed about 40 more then Floyd. CompuBox wrong by 130 punches or paid off? Two separate teams that were unbiased and had no interest in the fight at all, came up with nearly identical punches landed totals, an indication that there were accurate. According to correct punch totals, Pacquiao was the aggressor and therefore should have won the fight. One judge had it 10 rounds to 2 rounds for Floyd, obviously paid off. Nobody but a liar saw a 10-2 fight. Evander Holyfield said that Pacquiao won and he was at ring side. He said one guy wants to fight but the other guy is trying not to fight, so who do you score it for? He should know, the commentators never know.Comment
-
So if you lose but the loss doesn't indicate a loss of skills, you didn't really lose? Dumb, even for you.No we’re analzying it in whole.
Bradley 1 and Horn were obviously both robberies.
Boxing fans know that.
Marquez 4 KO was IN FACT influenced by the Bradley 1 robbery.
Mayweather, well, it’s Mayweather.
None of those bouts indicate PAC losing skills.
That’s why he just dominated Thurman. Big facts.Last edited by just the facts; 09-22-2019, 11:45 AM.Comment
Comment