Explain what happens If Ruiz vacates or gets stripped for the IBF belt?

[REDEEMER]

I'm too new to the site to know whether you're a troll or not, but the information you're posting is false.

Sanctioning bodies do not recognize rematch clauses. Nobody has the right to promise a title shot to somebody else. As far as the IBF is concerned, it's a voluntary defense being granted on the condition the winner agree in writing to face Pulev next.

If Ruiz vacates, Pulev faces the next highest contender for the vacant title. Point blank period. Joshua has no standing to leap frog Konwacki if the championship becomes vacant. You're simply wrong.

Yes they do if a champion drops out . The IBF for instance has a voting panel that can strip a champion for holding up a fight, etc. They then can motion to make an intern fight with an already scheduled one of that is the case.

[BoloShot]

He'll vacate the WBO before he vacates the IBF.

[juggernaut666]

This guy keeps saying if Ruiz vacates or gets stripped then Pulev vs. AJ will be for the vacant IBF belt because the belt is tied to the event, not the champion.



He doesn't listen to me or anyone he thinks isn't a fan of AJ. Can an AJ fan please explain to him the process of what happens if the IBF strips Ruiz or he vacates.

We don't know what will happen I already said that above but you still fewlt the need to include me here so now what??????

If you weren't such a re.tard and really looked at the rules you would know certain clauses in the sanctioning bodies can put forth a special permit .Wlad Klitchko was ranked 5 when he fought AJ ,so the fight doesn't always go to the number 1 and 2 guys you dumb mutha ****a.

[juggernaut666]

Yes they do if a champion drops out . The IBF for instance has a voting panel that can strip a champion for holding up a fight, etc. They then can motion to make an intern fight with an already scheduled one of that is the case.

I believe the IBF has the ability to make a tournament as well instead of a championship fight if they choose with vacant titles this would make it possible to have Joshua nd Pulev to have an interm championship fight.

[REDEEMER]

I believe the IBF has the ability to make a tournament as well instead of a championship fight if they choose with vacant titles this would make it possible to have Joshua nd Pulev to have an interm championship fight.

Joshua also wasn't ranked in the WBA at that time but got a title shot for the vacant belt with Klitschko, Browne and Ustinov were the number 1 and 2 guys I believe . These posters don't get that an already scheduled bout can have special circumstances its also why as you said Wlad at 5 was still getting the rematch if he wanted it because a he had a rematch clause in it ,its no different here. Pure insanity with these posters. Ha

[juggernaut666]

AJ can’t fight for the belt coming off of a loss. This guy knows jackshyt. It’s a known fact Juggernaut isn’t this guys first name it’s his surname, hence the name Jack Juggernaut

Klitchko got a rematch off a loss didn't he if he wanted it and its bc the SAME stipulation that Aj has in his contract Ruiz agreed to? you're the same re.tard who said Klitchko should get the AJ rematch strictly bc he had 2 training camps and was SHADED the victory ,whatever the F that means ?

[juggernaut666]

Joshua also wasn't ranked in the WBA at that time but got a title shot for the vacant belt with Klitschko, Browne and Ustinov were the number 1 and 2 guys I believe . These posters don't get that an already scheduled bout can have special circumstances its also why as you said Wlad at 5 was still getting the rematch if he wanted it because a he had a rematch clause in it ,its no different here. Pure insanity with these posters. Ha

Well the OP is a top Re,TARD for sure, and and also a welch and anyone who actually likes this kid is Re.TARDED too, anyone who agrees with him is even more RE.TARDED. lol

[DARTH SILKWORMS]

Yes they do if a champion drops out . The IBF for instance has a voting panel that can strip a champion for holding up a fight, etc. They then can motion to make an intern fight with an already scheduled one of that is the case.

I think you're a little confused about how things work.

If the challenger is mandatory and the champion vacates, the IBF would likely allow the mandatory to face the highest available contender for the vacant title to save the show.

If the challenger is mandatory and pulls out, the IBF would likely allow the champion to face the highest available contender to save the show and would count it as a mandatory defense.

If the challenge is voluntary and the champion vacates, and there are multiple available challengers rated higher than that voluntary, that voluntary has absolutely no rights and can't fight for the title.

[Jewish-Reptile]

Klitchko got a rematch off a loss didn't he if he wanted it and its bc the SAME stipulation that Aj has in his contract Ruiz agreed to? you're the same re.tard who said Klitchko should get the AJ rematch strictly bc he had 2 training camps and was SHADED the victory ,whatever the F that means ?

That’s the WBA they make their own rules as they go along as the wbc do, these orgs go back on their own rules to suit. Their were multiple circumstances around the AJ fight especially regarding the IBO who stated Klitschko would fight for their belt regardless of opponent, he’d pretty much put his face to their org since collecting the belt and they wanted to show their appreciation for what he’d done to bring the belt to prominence as its near even enough he’d in the same regard as the WBO.

The WBC before Klitschko fought Fury gave their blessing towards a unification and said they’d in no way hinder a Wilder fight holding it up enforcing mandated fights which could scupper delay and prolong a proposed fight, the years Vitali held the belt like recognised he held it with prestige and gave the organisation notoriety being held such a formidable champ, the WBC were in part doing Vitali a favour encouraging a unification for Wlad against Wilder something the WBC over the years haven’t particularly encouraged as they want to be recognised as THE ‘ official’ organisation rather than a watered down org like all have become with these multiple champions...

‘Shaded’ ? Is that even a word !? Whatever you say Jack....

[REDEEMER]

That’s the WBA they make their own rules as they go along as the wbc do, these orgs go back on their own rules to suit. Their were multiple circumstances around the AJ fight especially regarding the IBO who stated Klitschko would fight for their belt regardless of opponent, he’d pretty much put his face to their org since collecting the belt and they wanted to show their appreciation for what he’d done to bring the belt to prominence as its near even enough he’d in the same regard as the WBO.

The WBC before Klitschko fought Fury gave their blessing towards a unification and said they’d in no way hinder a Wilder fight holding it up enforcing mandated fights which could scupper delay and prolong a proposed fight, the years Vitali held the belt like recognised he held it with prestige and gave the organisation notoriety being held such a formidable champ, the WBC were in part doing Vitali a favour encouraging a unification for Wlad against Wilder something the WBC over the years haven’t particularly encouraged as they want to be recognised as THE ‘ official’ organisation rather than a watered down org like all have become with these multiple champions...

‘Shaded’ ? Is that even a word !? Whatever you say Jack....

You are changing your story from what you posted sir, Klitschko was ranked fifth in the IBF when he was going into the rematch before retiring . The WBA does not make things up , all sanctioned bodies have agreed to the multi title fight let's not lie now . You guys said the number 1 and 2 have to fight .

No one said anything about the WBC which has nothing to do with this ,huh ? It was the IBF that granted unified fight to AJ in an agreement that he would fight Pulev his mandatory after. You don't know what your talking about.