Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pacquiao Achievements is untouchable...

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
    Henry Armstrong

    Armstrong > Pacquiao... not even close, because he beat better opposition

    1937-1938 ... Armstrong had 41 fights..... 41 wins..... 37 by KO

    Armstrong held the equivalent of 6 titles AT THE SAME TIME

    and he was not nearly decapitated by a career-featherweight

    he basically achieved more in 2 years, that Pacquiao did in 20 years

    achieving more in 2 years, than Pac achieved in 20 years... means that Henry Armstrong is exactly 10x better than Pac

    Mayweather is only 3x better than Pac

    because of these 3 wins.....

    * taming Pacquiao, at 38yo
    * schooling Canelo, at 36yo
    * schooling Marquez, at 32yo

    unless you can think of a win on Pac's resume that is better ?

    just 1..... ?
    Armstrong is only 3 division champion
    (6 in pac era)
    pacquiao is 4 division champion in amrstrong era
    (8 in this era)
    see the difference?

    Don't try to say floyd his Achievements isn't worthy to be mentioned with pac...

    Comment


    • Originally posted by hugh grant View Post
      Pac s a 41 year old former flyweight part time senator with 71 fights and 24 year career. Why wouldn't they bow after Pac beat a undefeated fighter? What's Floyd got to do with it? Why would people bow to Floyd when jmm nearly killed him, bradley and horn beat pac? Floyd didn't look great against pac what was there to get excited about?
      Oh my bad. I don't get it lmmfao rotf...

      Comment


      • Originally posted by pasawayako View Post
        How many division champion floyd have?
        how many division lineal champion fkoyd have?
        Hiw many FOTY floyd have?
        Is floyd a FOTD?
        How many division floyd have fought?
        how old Floyd floyd become the ww champion

        Floyd achivements is so much inferior compare to pac Achievements.....
        You're just bumping the thread because you're Filipino and you love Pac lol. I'm out lmao...

        Comment


        • Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
          The Ring do not sanction, and they do not mandate

          they are just a magazine, like this.....





          " lineal " is just a participation award, for people who can't win a real title

          like they give to special needs kids who sit at the back of the class

          back in Armstrong's day, there was no such thing as a lineal champ... they did not need one, because they had a REAL champ

          Armstrong won 3x REAL titles..... in 3x REAL divisions..... by beating 3x REAL champions..... AT THE SAME TIME
          Ring belt/lineal champion is more recognize than the fake WBC,WBA,IVF, WBO and other belt combined..

          Armstrong is only 3 division champion, 6 in pac era

          pacquiao is 4 division champion in Armstrong era and 8 in his era...

          Pac Achievements is so much better than armstrong...

          Comment


          • Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
            The Ring do not sanction, and they do not mandate

            they are just a magazine, like this.....





            " lineal " is just a participation award, for people who can't win a real title

            like they give to special needs kids who sit at the back of the class

            back in Armstrong's day, there was no such thing as a lineal champ... they did not need one, because they had a REAL champ

            Armstrong won 3x REAL titles..... in 3x REAL divisions..... by beating 3x REAL champions..... AT THE SAME TIME
            Every champion of that era was the lineal champion. If you’re sh**ting on the lineal title to discredit pac, your sh**ting on the entire notion of how a fighter becomes champion and how that title is transferred. In this day and age, it’s a bit convoluted because of all these other “titles”...but it’s the orgs and all their belts that are clouding the issue, not the idea of a title lineage.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by FredWreck View Post
              Lmfao!
              1937-1938!!?
              We’re u there for those fights?!?
              Lmao r u 90 years old behind that lap top bruh?!

              Hahaha lmao omg u clowns make me laugh on NSB.

              1937-1938?!?
              Lmfao!

              Yeah and Bob Pettit is the greatest basketball player of all time!! Lmfao u clowns try so hard to hate Pacquiao u end up appearing to be clowns!

              1938-1937 lmao as if this guy was there to watch that era.
              Lmfao!




              how long should accomplishments stand, in your little mind, TrainWreck?

              FACT: Armstrong > Pacquiao

              REAL boxing fans do not need to criticize a truly great fighter to make a case for their guy

              Comment


              • Originally posted by pasawayako View Post
                Armstrong is only 3 division champion
                (6 in pac era)
                pacquiao is 4 division champion in amrstrong era
                (8 in this era)
                see the difference?

                Don't try to say floyd his Achievements isn't worthy to be mentioned with pac...




                like I told you on the other thread...

                a 5-division champ, who fought the best 5 times... is much better than a 6-division champ who only fought the best once

                there were 6 opponents that Pacquiao could not beat

                there was NOBODY that Mayweather could not beat

                Comment


                • Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
                  how long should accomplishments stand, in your little mind, TrainWreck?

                  FACT: Armstrong > Pacquiao

                  REAL boxing fans do not need to criticize a truly great fighter to make a case for their guy
                  Lmao you’ve probably never even watched a fight you just looked up info on Wikipedia!
                  Lmfao you effen nerds on NSB make me lmao!!

                  1937-1938 LMFAO!!!
                  As if you were there for that era and actually know what it was like!
                  Last edited by FredWreck; 08-19-2019, 11:45 PM.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Real King Kong View Post
                    Every champion of that era was the lineal champion. If you’re sh**ting on the lineal title to discredit pac, your sh**ting on the entire notion of how a fighter becomes champion and how that title is transferred. In this day and age, it’s a bit convoluted because of all these other “titles”...but it’s the orgs and all their belts that are clouding the issue, not the idea of a title lineage.




                    that is all you needed to say

                    fk lineage... what a joke

                    it is clearly obvious that the lineal champ is often not the best guy in his division... so who cares about lineage

                    WHO did you beat... with consideration given to when/how

                    The Ring ranked Canelo the #1 middleweight on the planet... despite the fact that he had never weighed more than 155, and despite the fact that he had never faced a middleweight opponent

                    about the same time, they ranked Adonis Stevenson #1 ahead of Kovalev... all because of lineage

                    lineage is just plain silly, and completely irrelevant

                    FACT: triangle theories do not work in boxing

                    WHO did you beat... with consideration given to when/how

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by FredWreck View Post
                      Lmao you’ve probably never even watched a fight you just looked up info on Wikipedia!
                      Lmfao you effen needs on NSB make me lmao!!

                      1937-1938 LMFAO!!!
                      As if you were there for that era and actually know what it was like!


                      FACT: it happened

                      you can continue crying if you want


                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP