Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pacquiao Achievements is untouchable...

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by larryxxx.. View Post
    ok, post his top 5 wins
    Nah, you can look them up on Wikipedia like a normal person.

    Max Kellerman the boxing analyst GOAT has already stated himself that Manny is TOP 5 ATG. His word is more credible than yours, don’t you think? Lmao.

    MANNY TOP 5 ATG.
    BIG FACTS FOLKS.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by FredWreck View Post
      Nah, you can look them up on Wikipedia like a normal person.

      Max Kellerman the boxing analyst GOAT has already stated himself that Manny is TOP 5 ATG. His word is more credible than yours, don’t you think? Lmao.

      MANNY TOP 5 ATG.
      BIG FACTS FOLKS.
      Why even reply to the question?? you never post any facts period..so troll on troll

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Raggamuffin View Post
        How many times has Pac lost? Pac only lmao... Hiw many times has Floyd lost? Floyd only lmao...
        How many division champion floyd have?
        how many division lineal champion fkoyd have?
        Hiw many FOTY floyd have?
        Is floyd a FOTD?
        How many division floyd have fought?
        how old Floyd floyd become the ww champion

        Floyd achivements is so much inferior compare to pac Achievements.....

        Comment


        • Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
          no son... because, Pac does not have the resume of Robinson

          Pac nearly died trying to equal Mayweather's achievement


          Pac won titles in 6 divisions... ok, I admit some of them were rubbish

          but Armstrong held the equivalent of 6 titles AT THE SAME TIME

          and none of them were rubbish... like Pac's with Diaz and cheato

          Armstrong > Pacquiao... not even close because he beat better opposition

          1937-1938 ... Armstrong had 41 fights..... 41 wins..... 37 by KO

          he basically achieved more in 2 years, that Pacquiao did in 20 years

          it sounds like the only boxers you know are Pacquiao Hoya and Mayweather

          oh... and of course, Marquez
          No one in all the name you mentioned isn't evwn close to pac achievements... try again....

          Comment


          • Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
            Kellerman say... Marquez beat Pacquiao 4x

            Kellerman say... Mayweather is better than Pacquiao

            Pacquiao say... Mayweather is so good I need to refuse drug tests and fake an injury
            MAX KELLERMAN said that pac is so much better than floyd in lb4lb and pac is the lb4lb GOAT..

            But what floyd had floyd achieved that no one had ever achieved? I think i will give u one floyd had achieved the highest paid athlete.. cong****... but in terms of boxing legacy?? naaah...

            Comment


            • Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
              a truly insane thing to suggest from the worst fanbase in boxing

              some of these guys are the lowest-level of casual-fan... despite posting here for YEARS LMAO

              they are sadly casual-fans for life
              Lol. You're just an insecure individual who couldn't accept that there's some one fron thw third world country had achieved the unbelievable things that u couldn't imagine... And u r here trying so hard to twist facts and try to convince everyone but only fool and haters would believed that.. lmao..

              Comment


              • Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
                Manny did not win a title at 126 and 140

                and Diaz and cheato are rubbish... they are just fake titles

                Pac is just a 3/4 division champ... like Broner

                Armstrong held the equivalent of titles in SIX divisions... AT THE SAME TIME
                cool story..

                pac is a lineal champion at 126 and 140 a more recognized belt than WBC,WBA,IBF,WBO or whatever belt combined...

                so how many division armstrong have? 3 in his era? 6 in this era? pac has 8... try again...

                Comment


                • Originally posted by pasawayako View Post
                  No one in all the name you mentioned isn't evwn close to pac achievements... try again....



                  Henry Armstrong

                  Armstrong > Pacquiao... not even close, because he beat better opposition

                  1937-1938 ... Armstrong had 41 fights..... 41 wins..... 37 by KO

                  Armstrong held the equivalent of 6 titles AT THE SAME TIME

                  and he was not nearly decapitated by a career-featherweight

                  he basically achieved more in 2 years, that Pacquiao did in 20 years

                  achieving more in 2 years, than Pac achieved in 20 years... means that Henry Armstrong is exactly 10x better than Pac

                  Mayweather is only 3x better than Pac

                  because of these 3 wins.....

                  * taming Pacquiao, at 38yo
                  * schooling Canelo, at 36yo
                  * schooling Marquez, at 32yo

                  unless you can think of a win on Pac's resume that is better ?

                  just 1..... ?

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by pasawayako View Post
                    cool story..

                    pac is a lineal champion at 126 and 140 a more recognized belt than WBC,WBA,IBF,WBO or whatever belt combined...

                    so how many division armstrong have? 3 in his era? 6 in this era? pac has 8... try again...



                    The Ring do not sanction, and they do not mandate

                    they are just a magazine, like this.....





                    " lineal " is just a participation award, for people who can't win a real title

                    like they give to special needs kids who sit at the back of the class

                    back in Armstrong's day, there was no such thing as a lineal champ... they did not need one, because they had a REAL champ

                    Armstrong won 3x REAL titles..... in 3x REAL divisions..... by beating 3x REAL champions..... AT THE SAME TIME

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
                      Henry Armstrong

                      Armstrong > Pacquiao... not even close, because he beat better opposition

                      1937-1938 ... Armstrong had 41 fights..... 41 wins..... 37 by KO

                      Armstrong held the equivalent of 6 titles AT THE SAME TIME

                      and he was not nearly decapitated by a career-featherweight

                      he basically achieved more in 2 years, that Pacquiao did in 20 years

                      achieving more in 2 years, than Pac achieved in 20 years... means that Henry Armstrong is exactly 10x better than Pac

                      Mayweather is only 3x better than Pac

                      because of these 3 wins.....

                      * taming Pacquiao, at 38yo
                      * schooling Canelo, at 36yo
                      * schooling Marquez, at 32yo

                      unless you can think of a win on Pac's resume that is better ?

                      just 1..... ?

                      Lmfao!
                      1937-1938!!?
                      We’re u there for those fights?!?
                      Lmao r u 90 years old behind that lap top bruh?!

                      Hahaha lmao omg u clowns make me laugh on NSB.

                      1937-1938?!?
                      Lmfao!

                      Yeah and Bob Pettit is the greatest basketball player of all time!! Lmfao u clowns try so hard to hate Pacquiao u end up appearing to be clowns!

                      1938-1937 lmao as if this guy was there to watch that era.
                      Lmfao!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP