Pacquiao Achievements is untouchable...
Collapse
-
-
Pac s a 41 year old former flyweight part time senator with 71 fights and 24 year career. Why wouldn't they bow after Pac beat a undefeated fighter? What's Floyd got to do with it? Why would people bow to Floyd when jmm nearly killed him, bradley and horn beat pac? Floyd didn't look great against pac what was there to get excited about?Comment
-
How many division champion floyd have?
how many division lineal champion fkoyd have?
Hiw many FOTY floyd have?
Is floyd a FOTD?
How many division floyd have fought?
how old Floyd floyd become the ww champion
Floyd achivements is so much inferior compare to pac Achievements.....Comment
-
The Ring do not sanction, and they do not mandate
they are just a magazine, like this.....
" lineal " is just a participation award, for people who can't win a real title
like they give to special needs kids who sit at the back of the class
back in Armstrong's day, there was no such thing as a lineal champ... they did not need one, because they had a REAL champ
Armstrong won 3x REAL titles..... in 3x REAL divisions..... by beating 3x REAL champions..... AT THE SAME TIME
Armstrong is only 3 division champion, 6 in pac era
pacquiao is 4 division champion in Armstrong era and 8 in his era...
Pac Achievements is so much better than armstrong...Comment
-
The Ring do not sanction, and they do not mandate
they are just a magazine, like this.....
" lineal " is just a participation award, for people who can't win a real title
like they give to special needs kids who sit at the back of the class
back in Armstrong's day, there was no such thing as a lineal champ... they did not need one, because they had a REAL champ
Armstrong won 3x REAL titles..... in 3x REAL divisions..... by beating 3x REAL champions..... AT THE SAME TIMEComment
-
Lmfao!
1937-1938!!?
We’re u there for those fights?!?
Lmao r u 90 years old behind that lap top bruh?!
Hahaha lmao omg u clowns make me laugh on NSB.
1937-1938?!?
Lmfao!
Yeah and Bob Pettit is the greatest basketball player of all time!! Lmfao u clowns try so hard to hate Pacquiao u end up appearing to be clowns!
1938-1937 lmao as if this guy was there to watch that era.
Lmfao!
how long should accomplishments stand, in your little mind, TrainWreck?
FACT: Armstrong > Pacquiao
REAL boxing fans do not need to criticize a truly great fighter to make a case for their guyComment
-
like I told you on the other thread...
a 5-division champ, who fought the best 5 times... is much better than a 6-division champ who only fought the best once
there were 6 opponents that Pacquiao could not beat
there was NOBODY that Mayweather could not beatComment
-
Lmfao you effen nerds on NSB make me lmao!!
1937-1938 LMFAO!!!
As if you were there for that era and actually know what it was like!Last edited by FredWreck; 08-19-2019, 11:45 PM.Comment
-
Every champion of that era was the lineal champion. If you’re sh**ting on the lineal title to discredit pac, your sh**ting on the entire notion of how a fighter becomes champion and how that title is transferred. In this day and age, it’s a bit convoluted because of all these other “titles”...but it’s the orgs and all their belts that are clouding the issue, not the idea of a title lineage.
that is all you needed to say
fk lineage... what a joke
it is clearly obvious that the lineal champ is often not the best guy in his division... so who cares about lineage
WHO did you beat... with consideration given to when/how
The Ring ranked Canelo the #1 middleweight on the planet... despite the fact that he had never weighed more than 155, and despite the fact that he had never faced a middleweight opponent
about the same time, they ranked Adonis Stevenson #1 ahead of Kovalev... all because of lineage
lineage is just plain silly, and completely irrelevant
FACT: triangle theories do not work in boxing
WHO did you beat... with consideration given to when/howComment
-
FACT: it happened
you can continue crying if you want
Comment
Comment