Pacquiao Achievements is untouchable...

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • pasawayako
    Undisputed Champion
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Dec 2009
    • 15348
    • 639
    • 194
    • 151,963

    #341
    Originally posted by aboutfkntime
    Henry Armstrong

    Armstrong > Pacquiao... not even close, because he beat better opposition

    1937-1938 ... Armstrong had 41 fights..... 41 wins..... 37 by KO

    Armstrong held the equivalent of 6 titles AT THE SAME TIME

    and he was not nearly decapitated by a career-featherweight

    he basically achieved more in 2 years, that Pacquiao did in 20 years

    achieving more in 2 years, than Pac achieved in 20 years... means that Henry Armstrong is exactly 10x better than Pac

    Mayweather is only 3x better than Pac

    because of these 3 wins.....

    * taming Pacquiao, at 38yo
    * schooling Canelo, at 36yo
    * schooling Marquez, at 32yo

    unless you can think of a win on Pac's resume that is better ?

    just 1..... ?
    Armstrong is only 3 division champion
    (6 in pac era)
    pacquiao is 4 division champion in amrstrong era
    (8 in this era)
    see the difference?

    Don't try to say floyd his Achievements isn't worthy to be mentioned with pac...

    Comment

    • Raggamuffin
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Aug 2016
      • 8200
      • 453
      • 961
      • 43,263

      #342
      Originally posted by hugh grant
      Pac s a 41 year old former flyweight part time senator with 71 fights and 24 year career. Why wouldn't they bow after Pac beat a undefeated fighter? What's Floyd got to do with it? Why would people bow to Floyd when jmm nearly killed him, bradley and horn beat pac? Floyd didn't look great against pac what was there to get excited about?
      Oh my bad. I don't get it lmmfao rotf...

      Comment

      • Raggamuffin
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Aug 2016
        • 8200
        • 453
        • 961
        • 43,263

        #343
        Originally posted by pasawayako
        How many division champion floyd have?
        how many division lineal champion fkoyd have?
        Hiw many FOTY floyd have?
        Is floyd a FOTD?
        How many division floyd have fought?
        how old Floyd floyd become the ww champion

        Floyd achivements is so much inferior compare to pac Achievements.....
        You're just bumping the thread because you're Filipino and you love Pac lol. I'm out lmao...

        Comment

        • pasawayako
          Undisputed Champion
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Dec 2009
          • 15348
          • 639
          • 194
          • 151,963

          #344
          Originally posted by aboutfkntime
          The Ring do not sanction, and they do not mandate

          they are just a magazine, like this.....





          " lineal " is just a participation award, for people who can't win a real title

          like they give to special needs kids who sit at the back of the class

          back in Armstrong's day, there was no such thing as a lineal champ... they did not need one, because they had a REAL champ

          Armstrong won 3x REAL titles..... in 3x REAL divisions..... by beating 3x REAL champions..... AT THE SAME TIME
          Ring belt/lineal champion is more recognize than the fake WBC,WBA,IVF, WBO and other belt combined..

          Armstrong is only 3 division champion, 6 in pac era

          pacquiao is 4 division champion in Armstrong era and 8 in his era...

          Pac Achievements is so much better than armstrong...

          Comment

          • Real King Kong
            Undisputed Champion
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • May 2010
            • 12029
            • 459
            • 24
            • 105,905

            #345
            Originally posted by aboutfkntime
            The Ring do not sanction, and they do not mandate

            they are just a magazine, like this.....





            " lineal " is just a participation award, for people who can't win a real title

            like they give to special needs kids who sit at the back of the class

            back in Armstrong's day, there was no such thing as a lineal champ... they did not need one, because they had a REAL champ

            Armstrong won 3x REAL titles..... in 3x REAL divisions..... by beating 3x REAL champions..... AT THE SAME TIME
            Every champion of that era was the lineal champion. If you’re sh**ting on the lineal title to discredit pac, your sh**ting on the entire notion of how a fighter becomes champion and how that title is transferred. In this day and age, it’s a bit convoluted because of all these other “titles”...but it’s the orgs and all their belts that are clouding the issue, not the idea of a title lineage.

            Comment

            • aboutfkntime
              Undisputed Champion
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Feb 2015
              • 47366
              • 1,631
              • 3,563
              • 391,308

              #346
              Originally posted by FredWreck
              Lmfao!
              1937-1938!!?
              We’re u there for those fights?!?
              Lmao r u 90 years old behind that lap top bruh?!

              Hahaha lmao omg u clowns make me laugh on NSB.

              1937-1938?!?
              Lmfao!

              Yeah and Bob Pettit is the greatest basketball player of all time!! Lmfao u clowns try so hard to hate Pacquiao u end up appearing to be clowns!

              1938-1937 lmao as if this guy was there to watch that era.
              Lmfao!




              how long should accomplishments stand, in your little mind, TrainWreck?

              FACT: Armstrong > Pacquiao

              REAL boxing fans do not need to criticize a truly great fighter to make a case for their guy

              Comment

              • aboutfkntime
                Undisputed Champion
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Feb 2015
                • 47366
                • 1,631
                • 3,563
                • 391,308

                #347
                Originally posted by pasawayako
                Armstrong is only 3 division champion
                (6 in pac era)
                pacquiao is 4 division champion in amrstrong era
                (8 in this era)
                see the difference?

                Don't try to say floyd his Achievements isn't worthy to be mentioned with pac...




                like I told you on the other thread...

                a 5-division champ, who fought the best 5 times... is much better than a 6-division champ who only fought the best once

                there were 6 opponents that Pacquiao could not beat

                there was NOBODY that Mayweather could not beat

                Comment

                • FredWreck
                  Banned
                  Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                  • May 2019
                  • 303
                  • 17
                  • 0
                  • 16,142

                  #348
                  Originally posted by aboutfkntime
                  how long should accomplishments stand, in your little mind, TrainWreck?

                  FACT: Armstrong > Pacquiao

                  REAL boxing fans do not need to criticize a truly great fighter to make a case for their guy
                  Lmao you’ve probably never even watched a fight you just looked up info on Wikipedia!
                  Lmfao you effen nerds on NSB make me lmao!!

                  1937-1938 LMFAO!!!
                  As if you were there for that era and actually know what it was like!
                  Last edited by FredWreck; 08-19-2019, 11:45 PM.

                  Comment

                  • aboutfkntime
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Feb 2015
                    • 47366
                    • 1,631
                    • 3,563
                    • 391,308

                    #349
                    Originally posted by Real King Kong
                    Every champion of that era was the lineal champion. If you’re sh**ting on the lineal title to discredit pac, your sh**ting on the entire notion of how a fighter becomes champion and how that title is transferred. In this day and age, it’s a bit convoluted because of all these other “titles”...but it’s the orgs and all their belts that are clouding the issue, not the idea of a title lineage.




                    that is all you needed to say

                    fk lineage... what a joke

                    it is clearly obvious that the lineal champ is often not the best guy in his division... so who cares about lineage

                    WHO did you beat... with consideration given to when/how

                    The Ring ranked Canelo the #1 middleweight on the planet... despite the fact that he had never weighed more than 155, and despite the fact that he had never faced a middleweight opponent

                    about the same time, they ranked Adonis Stevenson #1 ahead of Kovalev... all because of lineage

                    lineage is just plain silly, and completely irrelevant

                    FACT: triangle theories do not work in boxing

                    WHO did you beat... with consideration given to when/how

                    Comment

                    • aboutfkntime
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Feb 2015
                      • 47366
                      • 1,631
                      • 3,563
                      • 391,308

                      #350
                      Originally posted by FredWreck
                      Lmao you’ve probably never even watched a fight you just looked up info on Wikipedia!
                      Lmfao you effen needs on NSB make me lmao!!

                      1937-1938 LMFAO!!!
                      As if you were there for that era and actually know what it was like!


                      FACT: it happened

                      you can continue crying if you want


                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP