Pacquiao Achievements is untouchable...

[pasawayako]

Pac did not win a title at 126 or 140... and he never fought anyone even close to the best at 135 and 154

Pac is basically a 3-4 division champ... like Broner

that is why Mayweather beat him easy, and Marquez knock him into space

Armstrong is better than all those guys

Willie Pep would have beaten Pac at 126

Still having a hard time finding someone that can match pac achievements?

[aboutfkntime]

Floyd fans are worst. If Floyd is greater than maidana he never proved it, it's one all. If Floyd is greater than Castillo he didntt prove it it's one all. He needs a rubber 3rd fight to settle it! If flouds better than Pac he didn't prove it the world outside Vegas thinks Floyd lost.
Is it important what judges say, or is it important what armchair fans like you say?
Make your mind up.

Mayweather proved that he is better than Castillo and Maidana

Pacquiao never proved that he is better than Marquez

don't get your panties in a bunch... I admit that Pac is greater than Marquez

just

Pac is greater than Marquez... he just, could not beat Marquez

not cleanly

[Sustanon]

Pretty boy Floyd was a different fighter than money may .. one who fought Corley and San Judah was a different fighter. As a boxing fan those two would’ve been nice fight

The Floyd Jr. of OLD is long gone.
He should have stayed on lower weightclass

[aboutfkntime]

Lol. those guys are scrubs... margarito and diaz will ktfo those guys...

Diaz is a super cool dude

And armstrong couldn't beat 22 guys...

he scored 27 CONSECUTIVE knockouts... in 2 years

consecutive

in 2 years

Armstrong Achievements 3 division champion

I was messing around before when I said that 10x rubbish

truth be known...

Armstrong is the equivalent of a 8-division champion in this era

but whilst he beat fighters within a 8 division span SIMULTANEOUSLY (which is unthinkably phenomenal, something that NOBODY has ever done, including Pacquiao)... only 4 of those titles can be technically described as genuine by today's standards... because Armstrong only beat 4 champions, IF you count Garcia

but just because I like Hank, I cannot run around awarding him fake titles and achievements... like you guys do for Pac

WHO did you beat... with consideration given to when/how

remember?

all for one, one for all

Armstrong should be a 8-division champ... 4 of them genuine

but, he is a 6-division champ

Pac is also a 6 division champ

but...

Pac was not the best flyweight... Too Sharp Johnson was

Pac was not the best super-bantam... Paulie Ayala was

super-featherweight, ok... no argument... but that was a red hot division and fights with Valero, Juan Guzman, Soto, etc... all should have happened

did Pac REALLY win the second fight with Marquez ???

I will let it slide, but... w/e

Pac was not the best lightweight... Nate Campbell was, and there was also Diaz/Casamayor/Funeka, and Valero had moved up to lightweight by that point... plenty of great fights should have happened, but did not... David Diaz was not a genuine top 5 opponent

not necessarily blaming Pac, just saying that he did not take the path of most resistance... but Henry Armstrong had no choice, he fought the killers

Pac never fought the best welter until he fought Mayweather, and he LOST... and Pac never fought a genuine JMW, ever

this is the score...

Armstrong should be a 8-division champ, by today's standards... but he is a 6-division champ officially, by today's standards... 3 of those titles are truly GENUINE, and another 1 should be genuine...

IF the boxing gods had been paying attention... Armstrong would be a 8-division champion, 4 of those titles being genuine


===================================


Armstrong...
6 division champion... 3 GENUINE titles... (undisputed)

Pacquiao...
6 division champion... 1 GENUINE title... (undisputed - kinda)

additional comments for BOTH...

Armstrong... Hank also beat a PILE of ex-champions and top-level contenders before he fought for his first world title... building a phenomenal resume in a very short time

Pacquiao... in 3 of those divisions, Pac could have been the best, or very close... when he represented the division in question... he could have won a lot of those fights, or at least been very close... but, there were a LOT of great fights that could have happened, but did not happen

with Armstrong.... ALL of those fights happened

the fights I mentioned earlier that should have happened, but did not happen..... Armstrong fought the Too Sharp Johnsons, the Ayalas, the Valeros, the Guzmans, the Sotos, the Nate Campbells, the Baby Bulls, the Casamayors, the Funekas.....

ARMSTRONG FOUGHT ALL OF THOSE GUYS... AND HE KNOCKED ALL OF THEM OUT

27 of them consecutively

41 fights... 41 wins... 36 knockouts... in 2 years... is a truly phenomenal run when compared with standards from ANY era

Pac is an OUTSTANDING fighter... a true great

Hank Armstrong is IMMORTAL...

you're a pretty cool dude.... remember man, nobody is shltting on Pac when we point out his flaws/shortcomings... he is a phenom

but, there were MANY phenoms... and some of them were outright killers

there have been plenty of ninja's, Pac is not the first... nor is he the best

[FredWreck]

Diaz is a super cool dude





he scored 27 CONSECUTIVE knockouts... in 2 years

consecutive

in 2 years





I was messing around before when I said that 10x rubbish

truth be known...

Armstrong is the equivalent of a 8-division champion in this era

but whilst he beat fighters within a 8 division span SIMULTANEOUSLY (which is unthinkably phenomenal, something that NOBODY has ever done, including Pacquiao)... only 4 of those titles can be technically described as genuine by today's standards... because Armstrong only beat 4 champions, IF you count Garcia

but just because I like Hank, I cannot run around awarding him fake titles and achievements... like you guys do for Pac

WHO did you beat... with consideration given to when/how

remember?

all for one, one for all

Armstrong should be a 8-division champ... 4 of them genuine

but, he is a 6-division champ

Pac is also a 6 division champ

but...

Pac was not the best flyweight... Too Sharp Johnson was

Pac was not the best super-bantam... Paulie Ayala was

super-featherweight, ok... no argument... but that was a red hot division and fights with Valero, Juan Guzman, Soto, etc... all should have happened

did Pac REALLY win the second fight with Marquez ???

I will let it slide, but... w/e

Pac was not the best lightweight... Nate Campbell was, and there was also Diaz/Casamayor/Funeka, and Valero had moved up to lightweight by that point... plenty of great fights should have happened, but did not... David Diaz was not a genuine top 5 opponent

not necessarily blaming Pac, just saying that he did not take the path of most resistance... but Henry Armstrong had no choice, he fought the killers

Pac never fought the best welter until he fought Mayweather, and he LOST... and Pac never fought a genuine JMW, ever

this is the score...

Armstrong should be a 8-division champ, by today's standards... but he is a 6-division champ officially, by today's standards... 3 of those titles are truly GENUINE, and another 1 should be genuine...

IF the boxing gods had been paying attention... Armstrong would be a 8-division champion, 4 of those titles being genuine


===================================


Armstrong...
6 division champion... 3 GENUINE titles... (undisputed)

Pacquiao...
6 division champion... 1 GENUINE title... (undisputed - kinda)

additional comments for BOTH...

Armstrong... Hank also beat a PILE of ex-champions and top-level contenders before he fought for his first world title... building a phenomenal resume in a very short time

Pacquiao... in 3 of those divisions, Pac could have been the best, or very close... when he represented the division in question... he could have won a lot of those fights, or at least been very close... but, there were a LOT of great fights that could have happened, but did not happen

with Armstrong.... ALL of those fights happened

the fights I mentioned earlier that should have happened, but did not happen..... Armstrong fought the Too Sharp Johnsons, the Ayalas, the Valeros, the Guzmans, the Sotos, the Nate Campbells, the Baby Bulls, the Casamayors, the Funekas.....

ARMSTRONG FOUGHT ALL OF THOSE GUYS... AND HE KNOCKED ALL OF THEM OUT

27 of them consecutively

41 fights... 41 wins... 36 knockouts... in 2 years... is a truly phenomenal run when compared with standards from ANY era

Pac is an OUTSTANDING fighter... a true great

Hank Armstrong is IMMORTAL...

you're a pretty cool dude.... remember man, nobody is shltting on Pac when we point out his flaws/shortcomings... he is a phenom

but, there were MANY phenoms... and some of them were outright killers

there have been plenty of ninja's, Pac is not the first... nor is he the best

Lmao, damn homie you wrote an entire encyclopedia trying to make an argument!

But sorry, you’re wrong.
PAC is a top 5 ATG.
I got my point across in one sentence. Don’t try so hard bub. Only makes your argument look weaker.

[Real King Kong]

bingo, there it is !!

you managed to cough it out eventually

I also said... some of the others will struggle, and Diaz/Margarito will fall

that's what you said lol...not me. I've never really considered him a legit "8 division champion" tho...not that it even matters. he's still one of, if not the most accomplished fighter of this generation.

[kdd]

Lmao, damn homie you wrote an entire encyclopedia trying to make an argument!

But sorry, you’re wrong.
PAC is a top 5 ATG.
I got my point across in one sentence. Don’t try so hard bub. Only makes your argument look weaker.

Hahaha

Bruh he’s trying so hard to shade pacquaio .. no one is buying it bruh.. no one gonna think roger staubach is better than Tom Brady. Or Marciano is better than Ali or bill Russell over Jordan .. let it go.. just make a case for your favorite fighter Floyd.. we all know who u trying to rep.. just using Armstrong resume cuz Floyd doesn’t look too good.. hahaha

[pasawayako]

Diaz is a super cool dude





he scored 27 CONSECUTIVE knockouts... in 2 years

consecutive

in 2 years





I was messing around before when I said that 10x rubbish

truth be known...

Armstrong is the equivalent of a 8-division champion in this era

but whilst he beat fighters within a 8 division span SIMULTANEOUSLY (which is unthinkably phenomenal, something that NOBODY has ever done, including Pacquiao)... only 4 of those titles can be technically described as genuine by today's standards... because Armstrong only beat 4 champions, IF you count Garcia

but just because I like Hank, I cannot run around awarding him fake titles and achievements... like you guys do for Pac

WHO did you beat... with consideration given to when/how

remember?

all for one, one for all

Armstrong should be a 8-division champ... 4 of them genuine

but, he is a 6-division champ

Pac is also a 6 division champ

but...

Pac was not the best flyweight... Too Sharp Johnson was

Pac was not the best super-bantam... Paulie Ayala was

super-featherweight, ok... no argument... but that was a red hot division and fights with Valero, Juan Guzman, Soto, etc... all should have happened

did Pac REALLY win the second fight with Marquez ???

I will let it slide, but... w/e

Pac was not the best lightweight... Nate Campbell was, and there was also Diaz/Casamayor/Funeka, and Valero had moved up to lightweight by that point... plenty of great fights should have happened, but did not... David Diaz was not a genuine top 5 opponent

not necessarily blaming Pac, just saying that he did not take the path of most resistance... but Henry Armstrong had no choice, he fought the killers

Pac never fought the best welter until he fought Mayweather, and he LOST... and Pac never fought a genuine JMW, ever

this is the score...

Armstrong should be a 8-division champ, by today's standards... but he is a 6-division champ officially, by today's standards... 3 of those titles are truly GENUINE, and another 1 should be genuine...

IF the boxing gods had been paying attention... Armstrong would be a 8-division champion, 4 of those titles being genuine


===================================


Armstrong...
6 division champion... 3 GENUINE titles... (undisputed)

Pacquiao...
6 division champion... 1 GENUINE title... (undisputed - kinda)

additional comments for BOTH...

Armstrong... Hank also beat a PILE of ex-champions and top-level contenders before he fought for his first world title... building a phenomenal resume in a very short time

Pacquiao... in 3 of those divisions, Pac could have been the best, or very close... when he represented the division in question... he could have won a lot of those fights, or at least been very close... but, there were a LOT of great fights that could have happened, but did not happen

with Armstrong.... ALL of those fights happened

the fights I mentioned earlier that should have happened, but did not happen..... Armstrong fought the Too Sharp Johnsons, the Ayalas, the Valeros, the Guzmans, the Sotos, the Nate Campbells, the Baby Bulls, the Casamayors, the Funekas.....

ARMSTRONG FOUGHT ALL OF THOSE GUYS... AND HE KNOCKED ALL OF THEM OUT

27 of them consecutively

41 fights... 41 wins... 36 knockouts... in 2 years... is a truly phenomenal run when compared with standards from ANY era

Pac is an OUTSTANDING fighter... a true great

Hank Armstrong is IMMORTAL...

you're a pretty cool dude.... remember man, nobody is shltting on Pac when we point out his flaws/shortcomings... he is a phenom

but, there were MANY phenoms... and some of them were outright killers

there have been plenty of ninja's, Pac is not the first... nor is he the best

As what you always say pac couldn't beat 6 fighter, Armstrong couldn't beat 22 poeple and yet you considered him greater than pac.. lmao

Sorry dude, u cant change the fact that pac is the one and only 8 division champion. If u can find someone who can match pac Achievements i will concede to u..

Just keep looking there's plenty of boxer from the past to present..... lmao...

[aboutfkntime]

As what you always say pac couldn't beat 6 fighter, Armstrong couldn't beat 22 poeple and yet you considered him greater than pac.. lmao

Sorry dude, u cant change the fact that pac is the one and only 8 division champion. If u can find someone who can match pac Achievements i will concede to u..

Just keep looking there's plenty of boxer from the past to present..... lmao...

Armstrong is much better than Paccy... there is no question

even Mayweather is better than Paccy

Pac got knocked the fcuk out by straight bums

you cannot be a top-level great when you get knocked out by bums in your prime

not surprised that he could not beat good fighters like Marquez... if he kept getting knocked out by bums

knocking Marquez down 4x in the first round, AND breaking his nose... but not even winning the fight... is the biggest choke in sporting history

NOBODY, in any sport..... dropped the ball that badly

lets face it... from being in a unassailable position, Pac got schooled... then he got knocked out by a career featherweight

Armstrong achieved much more... and he did not suffer embarrassing losses to guys like Horn

you guys are ****** saying that Pac is on Armstrong's level... he clearly aint even on Mayweathers level

[aboutfkntime]

Henry Armstrong would not have ducked guys like Too Sharp Johnson, Ayala, Valero, Guzman, Soto, Campbell, Baby Bull Diaz, Casamayor, Funeka...

there are too many to mention