Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Letters from Team Rivas Lawyers Might Foretell Lawsuit

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #81
    Eddie Hearn could f up a cup of coffee. Here comes the Justice.

    What’s telling is Matchroom never says Dillian didn’t have PEDS in his system. They only say he was cleared. These dudes are disgusting.

    Comment


    • #82
      Where's the B sample results? Why is it taking so long? That's making this seem even more suspect!

      Comment


      • #83
        Maybe Eddie can hire Manuel Charr to make the B sample disappear

        Comment


        • #84
          All the UK fans claiming this is a setup are the biggest disgraces to boxing in the world.

          Comment


          • #85
            Originally posted by THEFRESHBRAWLER View Post
            Lol Dillian Whyte the 2x cheater has gone quiet since he failed another test.

            Tyson
            Hughie
            Saunders
            Whyte
            Povetkin
            Wawrzyk
            Galahad
            Wth is going on over there? Why are so many top fighters cheating?
            Primarily because testing in UK is joke and virtually non existent.

            Comment


            • #86
              if whyte gets banned for 4 years as per ukad rules that will probably be the end of his career as a boxer

              Comment


              • #87
                Originally posted by andocom View Post
                I can definitely see that perspective, I personally don't think notifying Rivas makes a difference either way though, it should not be up to Rivas to decide.

                If Whyte failed a test, Rivas shouldn't have a choice, Whtye should have been provisionally suspended and not allowed to compete even if Rivas was up for it. Like concussion protocols in various sports, you don't leave it up to the athletes as they are all to willing to continue and cause themselves harm.

                The thing is, an independent National anti doping panel had a hearing and heard evidence that we don't know and cleared him to fight, that is the interesting part and there better be a good reason.

                Personally I think the fight should of been called off
                It is what it is

                Comment


                • #88
                  Originally posted by REDEEMER View Post
                  The WBC / Vada got a positive test off of Stiverne but cleared him to fight by their rules they have to inform the opponents , if they didn't would they? It's not a promotion job to do that it's the commission more they set the rules and regulations.


                  Yes I understand clearly

                  I would think that there would be an unwritten rule between promoters
                  Cause they would look awful if something happened

                  Comment


                  • #89
                    Originally posted by MulaKO View Post
                    Personally I think the fight should of been called off
                    It is what it is
                    Understandable, but what are you basing that decision on?

                    We don't know what evidence was presented but NADP do, and they cleared him. They aren't a boxing org, they don't get fees from or have relationships with promoters, their only job is to adjudicate on doping hearings from all sports.

                    Of all the parties involved in this (promoters/sanctioning bodies/BBBoC), they are by far the least likely to be pressured or corrupted.

                    Not saying their decision was correct, just they have info we don't, so claiming their decision was wrong without knowing what they know is a little dangerous.

                    Comment


                    • #90
                      Originally posted by andocom View Post
                      Understandable, but what are you basing that decision on?

                      We don't know what evidence was presented but NADP do, and they cleared him. They aren't a boxing org, they don't get fees from or have relationships with promoters, their only job is to adjudicate on doping hearings from all sports.

                      Of all the parties involved in this (promoters/sanctioning bodies/BBBoC), they are by far the least likely to be pressured or corrupted.

                      Not saying their decision was correct, just they have info we don't, so claiming their decision was wrong without knowing what they know is a little dangerous.
                      Fine so how does this same organization explain the glove debacle. As Russ said tampering with the gloves or hands is more dangerous than PEDS.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP