Comments Thread For: Letters from Team Rivas Lawyers Might Foretell Lawsuit

[andocom]

BBOC aka British Bullcrap of Corruption should be investigated internally!

We’ve who have common sense and intelligence have been telling y’all that Edwards Hearns is nothing but a Car Salesmen with inheritance!

Guy has no morals and is filth!
Should be charged on the spot and hope he does!
Whyte should be made the ultimate example and as well Jarrell Big Pharma Miller !

Edwards has this and the possible Ruiz fight in the courts to deal with after last year saying he’s taking over USA boxing talent!

It’s a tie between him an Oscar Dela Fishnets with the biggest L in boxing right now this year!

Have you actually read anything in this thread? If you did you would know its not the BBBoC that made the decision, it was NADP which made the ruling for UKAD, BBBoC are bound by that decision, and Hearn & BBBoC can't disclose information which is confidential. What is he going to be charged with, following rules you don't understand or like?

Direct your spray at the UK National Anti Doping Panel who cleared him to fight by not imposing a provisional suspension after they had a hearing, sure they actually heard the evidence before their decision unlike you, but at least you'd possibly be pointing somewhat in the right direction.

[Alan Smithee]

You're quoting sources paraphrasing Eddie Hearn? Why not go straight to the source and hear it from the horse's mouth?

iFL Interviewer: The question is the WBC didn't know, Oscar Rivas didn't know, you were following protocol and confidentially, legally you weren't obliged to tell them?
Eddie Hearn: I wasn't allowed to tell them.

https://********/C53F-JPmEvw?t=2134

That's one interview where he is beating around the bush. He was quoted on numerous other occasions saying otherwise. Notice the 40:00 minute mark where he changes his tune.

[Ray*]

Wondering the same. The fight was three weeks ago. How long does it take to test a blood sample?

Has Whyte even asked that it be tested? I thought it was only tested if the person who failed requests it. I could be wrong but I thought that was how it worked.

The onus is on whyte to ask them to open his B-sample, but from what am hearing it could take up to a year. I mean in what world should that be happening? The B-sample would have been opened within a few days. But they are going to wait it out and you lawyers as a reason why they can’t talk or request certain things.

[_Rexy_]

The onus is on whyte to ask them to open his B-sample, but from what am hearing it could take up to a year. I mean in what world should that be happening? The B-sample would have been opened within a few days. But they are going to wait it out and you lawyers as a reason why they can’t talk or request certain things.

Oh Jesus Christ.

And what’s with this “Whyte has to ask” bull****? So they clear him to fight and they might not even test the only “proof” that they may have?

And Whyte/Hearn blind supporters keep parroting “we don’t know the facts, let’s wait for the facts” knowing that the facts will never come out. SMH

[andocom]

That's one interview where he is beating around the bush. He was quoted on numerous other occasions saying otherwise. Notice the 40:00 minute mark where he changes his tune.

He literally says the exact opposite of what you are claiming, he straight up says he is bound by confidentially. He doesn't change his tune at 40.00 mark, he says in addition to the fact he isn't allowed to provide that information it wouldn't be of any use even if he did.

Hearn is not obligated to inform Rivas.
Hearn is not permitted to inform Rivas.

Do you understand both those statements can obviously be true at the same time, and Hearn said both in that interview.

[_Rexy_]

He literally says the exact opposite of what you are claiming, he straight up says he is bound by confidentially. He doesn't change his tune at 40.00 mark, he says in addition to the fact he isn't allowed to provide that information it wouldn't be of any use even if he did.

Hearn is not obligated to inform Rivas.
Hearn is not permitted to inform Rivas.

Do you understand both those statements can obviously be true at the same time, and Hearn said both in that interview.

You’re missing the obvious here though.



Just believe Eddie Hearn says something, why do you believe it’s true? Would you believe Frank Warren? Bob Arum? Don King?

[andocom]

Oh Jesus Christ.

And what’s with this “Whyte has to ask” bull****? So they clear him to fight and they might not even test the only “proof” that they may have?

And Whyte/Hearn blind supporters keep parroting “we don’t know the facts, let’s wait for the facts” knowing that the facts will never come out. SMH

The B sample won't have anything to do with him being allowed to fight, 99 times out of 100 the B sample will show the same as the A sample. The B sample had nothing to do with him be allowed to fight Rivas as it hadn't been tested, its much more likely the VADA testing results along with whatever else was presented before the NADP will be what gets him off if anything does.

Whyte might ask for it to be tested just in case its that 1 in a 100, but if thats his last resort hes gone.

[_Rexy_]

The B sample won't have anything to do with him being allowed to fight, 99 times out of 100 the B sample will show the same as the A sample. The B sample had nothing to do with him be allowed to fight Rivas as it hadn't been tested, its much more likely the VADA testing results along with whatever else was presented before the NADP will be what gets him off if anything does.

Whyte might ask for it to be tested just in case its that 1 in a 100, but if thats his last resort hes gone.

I think the B test has exonerated maybe one or two people in the history.

And we’ll never find out because of a shady backroom meeting that only one side was allowed to even know about.

[andocom]

You’re missing the obvious here though.



Just believe Eddie Hearn says something, why do you believe it’s true? Would you believe Frank Warren? Bob Arum? Don King?

Of course not, and I wouldn't believe Eddie Hearn either, read the thread. The only reason I posted that is because someone else was saying Hearn never said he couldn't notify Rivas, just that he didn't have to. That link was just to prove Hearn has in fact said he couldn't notify Rivas.

I also posted UKAD's confidentially protocol, and WADA's definition of who is to be notified, they are what matters here.

I have never argued its ideal that Rivas wasn't notified, just that the rules have been followed, and if you want to blame someone at least understand it was NADP/UKAD who made that call, not BBBoC or Matchroom.

[REDEEMER]

Of course not, and I wouldn't believe Eddie Hearn either, read the thread. The only reason I posted that is because someone else was saying Hearn never said he couldn't notify Rivas, just that he didn't have to. That link was just to prove Hearn has in fact said he couldn't notify Rivas.

I also posted UKAD's confidentially protocol, and WADA's definition of who is to be notified, they are what matters here.

I have never argued its ideal that Rivas wasn't notified, just that the rules have been followed, and if you want to blame someone at least understand it was NADP/UKAD who made that call, not BBBoC or Matchroom.

I have a feeling Mr.Brett and Mr.Rexy are one of the same ,that is same ignorance of sounding alike and on top of each other frequently ? All they do is get things wrong and troll the forum .Ha